Conjurer means a witch right?
I think there's not so much explanation about the witch. I mean, the whole story lack of explanation and the shots are just about the 'scary hut' outside their (the casts) house. And this movie isn't scary at all. And what about the kid that showed in the first time, it leads to unclearly things that the kids just like staring and sneaking around their house without any explanation, and ends with awkward things. It was very very dissappointed.
Do you know what about the ending? It was really really boring. You can say this word at the end you watched this movie :"THAT'S ALL???" with unclearly faces expression. I think you guys don't need to see this. I didn't know why i could spent my time to watched this. It wasn't worth for me.
Wife and husband whose just loss a baby decide to seek for a new life by moving to a new house set up by his brother-in-law played by John Schneider of Dukes Of Hazzard fame. He then start to see and hear things regarding the old cabin nearby his house which is supposed to be inhabitat by an old witch whose somehow reincarnated into a black crow and the protagonist obsessively seeks for answers about it's the house's true history.
The twist is okay but with one too many. And although the scene where the wife puts on a lost ring (suspected to have belonged to the witch) without saying anything about it and just puts it on is nonsense and does not reflect what most people would do upon finding something that does not belong to them is nonsense. It is on that scene and the very last shot killed the entire movie.
2 out of 4
so nice that there is such illness to which give all the credit!
After a slow start patient viewers will be rewarded with some effective scares and spooky atmospheric photography. This is a horror film which doesn't rely on blood and gore to get its scares so it's a good start for people who normally steer clear of the genre.