Curly Sue - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Curly Sue Reviews

Page 1 of 38
½ October 8, 2016
Dans sa dernière réalisation, John Hughes décide d'aller à fond dans le lacrymal crétin et la manipulation éhontée du public avec son Curly Sue. Cette histoire d'un père célibataire et de sa fille qui vivent de petits délits et qui rencontrent une avocate soi-disant cynique et carriériste est autant cousue de fil blanc qu'elle est inintéressante et ce ne sont ni Jim Belushi, ni Kelly Lynch qui parviennent à surmonter la nullité du script. En revanche, John Getz joue à merveille le salopard de service et sauve le film à plusieurs occurrences, surtout dans le troisième acte. Il n'en demeure pas moins que John Hughes, en 1991, est devenu extrêmement ringard, même dans sa mise en scène quasiment impersonnelle.
jamrcla
Super Reviewer
July 30, 2016
No real plot but my mum used to always watch it and got me to like it more than I should.
April 8, 2016
My family and I went back and watched Curly Sue after seeing Alison on the Voice. We all absolutely loved it! Very entertaining and fun.
March 5, 2016
Yes, predictable formula. But Porter and Belushi throw in pretty good performances.
June 15, 2015
john hughes sentimental rendering of a con artist and the adopted daughter who runs scams is a little too heavy handed at times but shows the different direction he decided to take in the 1990s. Not great but the actors are good and it is sweet at parts.
½ December 30, 2014
Curly Sue is a cheesy but charming 90's movie from John Hughes. If you're a hard-bitten intellectual and you're into serious films and don't like to get taken for a sucker with cornball manipulation, this isn't your film. It's not great and it's not deep, but it sure does have a heart. That it has been written and directed by John Hughes should not come as much of a surprise, because he has a knack for stories that tug at the heartstrings, exploiting basic human sentiment. It is really hard not to wonder if this is the same John Hughes who wrote "The Breakfast Club". The movie is sweet and silly in an innocent, naive way, although a little heavy on the visual gags and body humor for my tastes. This was also Hughes final film as a director which could in part be due to the fact that he and Belushi didn't agree on many aspects of the character causing production to be halted numerous times. It's rather barebones from a writing and a technical standpoint, but I don't think Hughes intended it to be a particularly ground-breaking cinematic feat. The heart is in the story and the characters and they satisfy completely. This is an endearing movie that's pleasant enough to fill your next free afternoon with nostalgia. This movie also features the on screen debut of a little known actor named Steve Carell.

VERDICT: "In The Zone" - [Mixed Reaction] These kinds of movies are usually movies that had some good things, but some bad things kept it from being amazing. This rating says buy an ex-rental or a cheap price of the DVD to own. If you consider cinema, ask for people's opinion on the film. (Films that are rated 2.5 or 3 stars)
½ December 27, 2014
Isn't she cute? It's not a classic like Annie but a "feel-good-movie", yes.
December 6, 2014
The kid is cute and provides a handful of funny and heartfelt moments but the film horrendous; with bad acting, bad music and weak script. Schmaltzy in the worst way with an extremely awkward blend of physical comedy and cloying sentimentality.
October 27, 2014
The film's story and characters are a delight, but Curly Sue is also chock full of low brow humor.
Still a pretty good film overall, despite it's lack of wit.
½ October 25, 2014
The best thing about this film is it was Steve Carell's feature film debut. The worst thing about this film is it was John Hughes's final film as a director.Curly Sue will steal your heart... till you don't have one anymore. And then, heartless, you'll seethe in anger watching one of the worst examples of class envy ever made.
September 28, 2014
omg i loved this movie when i was a kid
July 29, 2014
(First and only viewing - 1/28/2011)
June 11, 2014
Look at the cover! Cute isn't it? So you think it's going to be a pretty good film?

Well, it's not. And there are many reasons why! The small 9-year-old girl who appears to be sweet, has a Mary-Kate and Ashley voice, and even cutesy is a precocious child who, which appears tries too hard to be as good as Culkin's character in "Home Alone". She is not likable. It's just an unbearable cutesy film that is like Shirley Temple's "Curly Top" but has failed to be a good movie. The characters are quite cheesy, the direction is horrible. Porter did a pretty good job on her character, though none of the movie was funny.

Sue was an annoying character. And in the car accident scene, Why did Sue have to cry and say that she killed her father? She could've at least wait until he was okay before she welled up.
½ June 9, 2014
I remember liking it not very memorable and
Not very funny
C-
Cameron W. Johnson
Super Reviewer
½ April 28, 2014
Forget you guys, I'm not referencing the Takida song of the same name, because it's too recent, and does the opposite of this film: actually tries to take itself seriously, to the point of being post-grunge. Yeah, it's a little hard to take anyone or anything with the name "Curly Sue" very seriously, although that might simply be because of this film, which doesn't even take itself seriously enough to spring for bigger names. I mean, it's not like this film was ever going to get John Belushi, for obvious reasons, but it probably could have done better than Jim Belushi, and of all the Beatles it could have gotten to do an original song, it got Ringo Starr. No, people, I like Ringo, but he isn't quite Paul, or even George, who they should have gotten for the sake of reinforcing this film's themes on eyebrows. As surely as anyone or anything named "Curly Sue" is hard to take seriously, any film featuring a Belushi brother is somewhat about eyebrows, seeing as how they're so characteristic for a Belushi, and if you're going by that logic, this film is also about noses, because, to those who like interesting facts, at least so that you would have something interesting to talk about when it comes to this film, this marked Steve Carrell's film debut. Actually, I guess you could do worse when it comes to films to debut in than the last feature directed by John Hughes, but if that's not good enough, you still shouldn't worry, because people will be directing their disappointment towards Hughes once they start thinking about how this was indeed the last film he directed. Well, I guess people outside of me will be doing that, because I actually like the film, despite its having some laziness which extends beyond getting Ringo Starr when they could have gotten George Harrison.

I suppose the charm of the performances and some highlights in endearing storytelling allow you to get used to the characters and their sides of the stories, because laziness even plagues expository value, to the point of cleansing the film of immediate development, while limiting gradual development, even though the film is long enough as it is, reaching a runtime of a smidge over 100 minutes partly through draggy material, or at least material that feels draggy, due to limp spells in atmosphere. The film is plenty entertaining, and that saves the final product as pretty decent, but there are cold spells in John Hughes' direction that, when coupled with a combination of tightening development down and dragging filler out, result in an inconsistency in pacing which proves about almost as blanding as tonal inconsistencies. As much as they advertize this film as fluff, fluff and more fluff, it's accurately billed as a comedy-drama, at least to an extent in which the fluff is juggled with sentimentality, and not exactly organically, as the film, partly because it's so underdeveloped and largely because it's so tonally unsubtle, fails to flesh out layers enough to be less than jarring with its alternating between light and slightly weighty. Of course, no matter which tonal extreme it jars to, the film keeps consistent in cheese, whether it be devolving to a near-trite and decidedly corny, if not rather immature sense of humor, or devolving too deeply into sentimentality, trying a touch too hard to draw your investment into a narrative that, even in concept, is too thin for its own good. The story is too light to be all that interesting, of course, and it's surely barely probable, but more than any of that, it's unrefreshing, with nothing new to say that as a very early '90s fluff dramedy about the poor and the rich changing each other's lives upon meeting under unusual circumstances. There's something lazy about this unoriginal story concept, whose interpretation is about as bland, maybe not to where I'm nearly as aggravated with the final product as others, but certainly to where the final product fails to stand as all that rewarding as the final directorial effort for a legendary filmmaker. Regardless, this reflects John Hughes' filmmaking sharpness to endear through all of its shortcomings with a share of commendable elements.

Mere months away from passing away, Georges Delerue turned in a score for this film which was neither unique nor consistently subtle, augmenting much of the film's cheesy feel, but still also augmenting color through lively alternations between upbeat compositions and some tastefully subdued, if a little sentimental pieces. The soundtrack is prominent throughout the film, and it's generally successful in securing entertainment value, established through a final directorial performance by John Hughes which, while uneven, sentimental and altogether not nearly as inspired as other notable efforts by Hughes, keeps pace generally smooth enough to be fun, until steadied in a realized enough fashion to, well, kind of compel, particularly with a genuinely moving, if very commercially written ending. The film is dramatically lacking, of course, but endearing highlights stand, not so much on the backs of an engrossing narrative or subtle writing, but on the back of a directorial thoughtfulness by Hughes that reflects the now-late filmmaker's storytelling abilities, despite questionable material, including material that he himself penned. Of course, that's not to say that the material Hughes has to work with as a director is consistently questionable, for although his script is particularly reflective of laziness, what with its structural and tonal inconsistencies, expository shortcomings and cheese, Hughes draws a decent, if barely probable dramedy story which is thematically sweet, and interpreted with some actually genuine and effective dramatics, and plenty of genuinely amusing humor. The film has plenty of lazy-feeling elements, but it actually doesn't feel lazy on the whole, feeling more ambitious as a lighthearted dramedy, more than a few elements of which are, in fact, well-handled by Hughes' entertaining storytelling, as well as anchored by a worthy cast. At the very least, the leads of this cast endear, with Kelly Lynch being actually pretty convincing in her portrayal of a lonely woman whose heart goes warmed by misfortunate, but well-meaning characters, while Jim Belushi and a young Alisan Porter most engage, not just with individual thorough charm, but with a chemistry that is near-delightful in its own charm, with a hint of dramatic effectiveness that sells the more sensitive themes of this film. The film is driven by its characters' interactions, the performers, being more effective than the writing of the interactions, prove to be effective enough to play an instrumental role in carrying the final product as pretty decent, maybe even a touch underrated, even with a share of issues that are overcome enough by highlights in performances on and off of the screen to make for a fair, if forgettable dramedy.

Bottom line, the film jarringly alternates between underdeveloped and overdrawn, and cheesily fluffy and dramatically sentimental, while keeping consistent enough in improbability and a lack of originality for the final product to collapse as underwhelming and forgettable, but not as faulty as they say, thanks to the tender, if sentimental scoring and direction, adequately colorful writing, and worthy performances by and chemistry between John Belushi, Kelly Lynch and Alisan Porter that make John Hughes' "Curly Sue" a plenty entertaining and sometimes touching family dramedy, despite its shortcomings.

2.5/5 - Fair
½ April 13, 2014
Maybe a little too sweet and fluffy for its own good, the last directed film of John Hughes is still enjoyable, if unexceptional.
April 5, 2014
Best movie ever saw it one day on TV and the next day I went out and bought it that's how good it is
March 2, 2014
one of director john hughes lessor known works
February 20, 2014
Its a cute movie, just one of those family movies everyone can enjoy. Great little actress as well. I'm always impressed of how well she accomplishes her role in this film.
Page 1 of 38