Rotten Tomatoes

Movies / TV

    Celebrity

      No Results Found

      View All
      Movies Tv shows Movie Trivia News Showtimes

      Dagon Reviews

      Prev Next

      The only reason this review describes "Dagon" as "one of the scariest movies ever made," instead of as "the scariest movie ever made," is because I haven't seen every film.

      Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/4 | Jun 28, 2020

      Gordon knows what his audience wants, and time and again he proves a deft hand at giving it to them.

      Full Review | Original Score: 7/10 | Oct 21, 2019

      For our money, Dagon is very possibly the best Lovecraft movie produced so far (we're overlooking Carpenter's underrated In The Mouth of Madness because that was only tentatively inspired by Lovecraft's mythos).

      Full Review | Original Score: 9/10 | Aug 15, 2018

      Dagon isn't as outright funny as Gordon's Re-Animator or From Beyond, but it has moments of spunkiness to puncture the incredible strangeness of it all.

      Full Review | Original Score: 3/4 | Jul 27, 2018

      Uma histria absurda que consegue gerar alguns bons momentos de tenso (especialmente em sua primeira metade, quando ainda no sabemos para onde o filme est caminhando).

      Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Mar 24, 2006

      Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Aug 19, 2005

      There's nothing wrong with a well-done, atmospheric, spooky chiller, especially coming from a director far less frequently heard from than he deserved to be.

      Full Review | Original Score: B | Dec 8, 2004

      What we really have here is a cheap horror potboiler: Stuart Gordon's Attack of the Fish People. I swear that's not a bad thing.

      Full Review | Original Score: B | Dec 2, 2002

      Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Jul 12, 2002

      No one other than H.P. Lovecraft fans should bother.

      Full Review | Original Score: D | Jun 22, 2002

      The setting is worth ogling when the women have their shirts on.

      Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Jun 21, 2002

      Prev Next
      Do you think we mischaracterized a critic's review?