Dead Ringer - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Dead Ringer Reviews

Page 1 of 5
August 22, 2017
I love this movie. The plot pulls you in from the start and you simply do not want it to end. This was and still is greatly underrated. Bette Davis is excellent in this. Yes, at times it is a bit campy but if you are a fan of
mystery thrillers and of Bette Davis or classic cinema- you cannot miss this. This is in my list for top 20 fav films.
½ July 22, 2017
While it couldn't play today with forensic technology being so precise, Dead Ringer hits all the right marks in suspense and irony.
March 20, 2017
Continuing our Bette Davis retrospective.
½ January 25, 2017
So good. Twisted. Davis is a little too melodramatic but it kind of works.
½ August 28, 2016
Not a bad murder suspense flick with Davis playing twin sisters.
½ May 10, 2015
The plot and ensuing developments are intriguing, but it appears that Dead Ringer suffers from shoddy, emotionless acting and questionable scripting.
January 17, 2015
Harmless but really age hasn't done it justice. Could be an interesting tale to tell again in a new setting.
½ November 17, 2014
Always had a soft spot for this clever Bette Davis film!
September 1, 2014
When watching Dead Ringer, you have to remember that this was a point in time when Bette Davis was on a career rebound. She had just had some big success with What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? and she was being offered a lot of projects at the time. The trouble was that she was offered many of the same types of roles: crazy and disturbed women doing despicable things. This film really isn't an exception. Although it feels slightly like Paul Henreid had Psycho in mind when he was cutting the film together, the film itself is just a mediocre sort of thriller. Davis does some nice work, but the twists and turns in the storyline feel like they're trying too hard, but it also feels like they didn't really know what to do with the premise. It's executed well enough, but it feels lacking, as if half the script was cut out before shooting began. There's no real payoff in the end, despite the so-called "twist ending." It's not a terrible movie at all, but it lacks a little in the story department mostly.
July 29, 2014
Bette Davis shines in the dual role of twin sisters in this 1963 film noir/thriller, featuring a great musical score by Andre Previn and beautiful black and white cinematography. Follows the tale of one rough-and-tumble sister swapping her life for that of the rich, well-to-do sibling. Strong supporting cast, too, particularly Karl Malden as the good cop/boyfriend of Edie. A tightly written script with an ending that does not disappoint.
November 17, 2013
A scorned woman learns that crime diesn't pay. Bette Davis is great as the embittered sister who kills her recently widowed wealthy twin and assumes her identity. Consider this to be the continuation of Davis' 1940s film "A Stolen Life" where she also played two twins, one good and one bad.

Davis is convincing in helping us discern the differences between the two sisters who are totally dissimilar in temperament and style. Davis fans will be amused by the wealthy Maggie's declaration that she quit smoking years before while Edith puffs like a locomotive. It is Edith who gets the upper hand, taking over her sister's life and discovers that Maggie had a few horrifying secrets of her own that render her actually quite evil.

Karl Malden is excellent in his standard role as the police officer in love with the simple Edith; her down-to-earth protector. Peter Lawford doesn't appear until two-thirds into the movie as the sleazy gigolo lover of Maggie's who realizes what is going on uses it to blackmail Edith. He eventually gets his comeuppance in a great scene where he gets attacked by Edith's dogs. A good supporting cast, especially the religious in-law played by Estelle Winwood, a butler played by Cyril Delavanti and a gossipy socialite played by Jean Hagen.

What makes this film so compelling are the lengths that Bette has to go through to keep this charade going. From the handwriting, to recognizing friends and rooms in the mansion, Bette has a field day. The irony here is great when Bette realizes what a witch her sister was, but it's too late to do anything about it. Just seeing why Bette goes to the chair at the end is just unbelievable.

Bette Davis steals every scene she was in with her over-the-top kind of performing that she became known for. This is a campy delight; not only because it gives her the most clever lines, but is a reminder of how good an actress she was.
½ October 9, 2013
Bette Davis is excellent here... All the twist and turns had me on the edge of my seat!
September 2, 2013
a strong roll for bette davis...
July 25, 2013
one of the better late career pix for davis
July 10, 2013
Crime Don't Pay.....
½ June 3, 2013
"I'm Margaret DaLorca, Sergeant - as you said , Edie would nevah hurt a fly!"
--- Bette Davis (as Edie DaLorca pretending to be Margaret DaLorca).

Superb film! Bette Davis was amazing (as usual), she played both twin beautifully to where each lady had very distinct mannerism, not just physical attributes. Karl Malden was pretty awesome too, but the real kick for me was seeing a very young Philip Carey (who played Sargent Hoag, but I will forever fondly know as the magnanimous Asa Buchanan). Although the cast was simply stellar, I have to admit that the real star of this movie was the plot. Granted, by today's standards, the ruse would quickly unravel through the use of modern forensic and evidence gathering but methodology was a lot more simpler then and much of the investigation went by sheer gut-feeling and instinct. The scheme was kind of diabolically clever albeit a wee bit dark, especially given the era. This movie was thoroughly engaging, a little ironic and a little heartbreaking.
Super Reviewer
May 23, 2013
Another in a string of Bette Davis' comeback movies of the sixties, "Dead Ringer" feels and looks recycled, but has all the mystery and charm of a Davis' film. What feels recycled ultimately boils down to the fact that many of the pieces of the plot are the same as other, better films. Davis had played identical twins earlier in the 1946 film "A Stolen Life" and Olivia de Havilland had basically played the same kind of role in a very similar film entitled "The Dark Mirror" from that same year. Murderous twins have always been an interesting thriller concept and noir staple, because of the extremes that siblings can present when they are given the chance to kill. Davis was reemerging in the public sphere after her Oscar nominated turn in "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?". This film and another film of that decade put Davis back into the limelight and with good reason. She was the queen of the film noir as well as acted in dramatic turns in the thirties and forties. This film exploits her popularity to the fullest, as well as her newfound fame, and without her this film would not have had the same impact, and wouldn't have been enjoyable. Another great performance in this film comes from legendary actor Karl Malden. It's his curiosity into the death of his girlfriend and compassion towards her twin sister that really makes a statement about how a person changes when they murder someone, no matter how sweet or innocent they were beforehand. It seems obvious why Edie kills Margaret: because she is in debt, her sister has everything because she married her former beau, and Edie has had a hard, miserable life. Her impersonation of her sister isn't always spot on, and the ensuing story about her living day to day, trying to keep up the mirage she's concocted, doesn't do much except tell us about the social life of Margaret. The film doesn't say much about Edie as a character, or how she feels while deceiving everyone, including her boyfriend, which is especially damning. She is immediately demonized after killing her sister, and is oftentimes shown to be unreliable, calculating, and very bitter. This film only emphasizes Davis, and most of the film is exposition that includes her own musings. The peripheral characters are mostly slags and socialites, and except for Karl Malden, none of them give any insight into the character of Margaret, who remains a mystery except for what little insight Tony gives us, which is only that he exists. Only the ending tells us anything about either twin, gives us any moral, or any damning existential question.
May 9, 2013
despite the fact that at times it seems a little unlikely its an enjoyable thriller with an origianal plot and a greatest bette davis
½ April 14, 2013
Very interesting, but sometime after one hour, the charade seems to have gone on for too long.
Page 1 of 5