Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary


Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary

Critics Consensus

Guy Maddin's film is a richly sensuous and dreamy interpretation of Dracula that reinvigorates the genre.



Total Count: 62


Audience Score

User Ratings: 2,750
User image

Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary Photos

Movie Info

A cinematic transposition of the Royal Winnipeg Ballet's Interpretation of Bram Stoker's classic vampire yarn from stage to screen.


Critic Reviews for Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary

All Critics (62) | Top Critics (26) | Fresh (54) | Rotten (8)

  • Guy Maddin's unusual take on Bram Stoker's story sets members of Canada's Royal Winnipeg Ballet against the director's version of a silent movie. The result is a hauntingly graceful vision of the late-Gothic novel, peppered with high camp.

    Jan 14, 2018 | Full Review…
  • Though it sounds like an offbeat idea even for horror fans, the tech work is so well done that it could disarm unwary buffs attracted by the campy title.

    Sep 26, 2007

    Deborah Young

    Top Critic
  • An elaborate, self-conscious but arresting take on the Dracula myth.

    Sep 26, 2007 | Rating: 3/5 | Full Review…
  • By the end, you'll wonder why all films aren't made this way.

    Feb 11, 2006 | Full Review…
    Time Out
    Top Critic
  • Just when you think that holly stakes, garlic, crucifixes and capes are all there is to vampire stories, Maddin and the Royal Winnipeg put Dracula back on his toes.

    May 7, 2004 | Rating: 4/5
  • Attractive art house picture.

    Jan 15, 2004 | Full Review…

    Philip French

    Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary

  • Apr 01, 2009
    Guy Maddin directed this extraodinary interpretation of Bram Stoker's Dracula by the Royal Winnipeg Ballet. Several episodes of the original story are narrated lineally with dance and the help of intertitles. Consider this is a 73 minute adaptation of a very, very long and complex book. Do not be very demanding in what faithfulness to the source is concerned. The ballet is set to the 1st and 2nd Symphonies by Gustav Mahler. Maddin's Dracula is ethereal, evocative, suggestive, sensual, humorous, and beautiful. Now that vampires are so fashionable and that countless interpretations, re-imaginings, derivatives of the famous story have been done and seen, this particular adaptation stands out. It stays, of course, on the classical side of the spectrum, boasting beautiful sets and costumes and staying true to a certain sobriety that ran through the original story. However, any pretension of gravity is pretty much overshadowed by Maddin's liberal use of color, black and white, iris transitions, distortion, light, and shadow. "Dracula" is eye-catching to say the least, and that also speaks for the attractive of the dancers' performance. How one can stay focused on <i>them</i> is marvelous, especially with how meticulous ballet often is, considering all the visual distractions. I don't know if all the actors were dancers, even those who did not do much dancing, but I can say their performances were perfectly dramatic and haunting. Watching Dracula unaware of its technical specifications, one could be misled into thinking this film was made in the 1920s: it uses techniques typical of that era. It's expressionistic and self-aware and knowingly elegant. But it is distinctly free-spirited in that it revels in its own ambiguity; this, I suppose, comes free with the vampire package. To work suggestion and ambiguity in a vampire film is to do it right. Vampyrism is, by itself, loaded with symbolism and darkness. Guy Maddin honors this tradition, while adding some personal touches... The film begins with Lucy Westenra's nightmare about immigrants. Come on, it's funny. Maddin underlines the xenophobia in Bram Stoker's book. Yet this is not a satire; he's simply poiting out something. Another addition is one very protagonic role played by <i>money</i>. Perhaps he is suggesting greed is no different than vampyrism. Finally, the casting choices were excellent. Lucy was just adequately wicked and looked like a complete bitch throughout; as it turns out, that's about right. I don't believe there was a single miscast. Zhang Weiqiang as Dracula was spot-on. In such a peculiar film, in which so many things fight for the spotlight -be it artistic direction, music, cinematography- Dracula had to be a highlight, and what better way than by casting an Asian dancer? Not only that, but he is great. His Dracula is not caricaturesque or over-the-top, it's a perfectly elegant, vicious, lustful young man. With fangs. A scene-stealer. What I liked best about this film is that it didn't intend to over-emphasize the sexual undertones. In fact, by using such a delicate technique as ballet, these aspects are highlighted in the classiest and most elevated way. Pages from a Virgin's Diary may, therefore, not be for everyone. But it's an undeniably ambitious and original project and an artistic achievement. And now I can't wait to see what else Guy Maddin can do...
    Elvira B Super Reviewer
  • Nov 08, 2008
    Interesting take on Dracula. It's very artsy. I liked the overall mood of the film was very nice.
    Marion R Super Reviewer
  • Jul 28, 2008
    Bram Stoker's Dracula interpreted by the Royal Winnepeg ballet. The combination of the dance and Maddin's unique touches such as the intertitles and small bursts of colour make this beautiful visually.
    Emily B Super Reviewer
  • Jun 23, 2008
    Oh Guy Guy Guy. Sometimes I just don't get you. My head was pounding for days afterwards. Ever want to tell something in a straight forward manner?
    John B Super Reviewer

Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

News & Features