Epic - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Epic Reviews

Page 2 of 137
March 25, 2016
Although not being from one of the big animation studios, Epic is still a pretty good film. Contains a lot of great voice talent but unfortunately doesn't pay off a lot of the time. Overall it's an okay film and I enjoyed it for the most part.
March 5, 2016
If you want to waste and hour and a half on unmemorable characters and a weird story, this is the movie for you. It's cute overall, with good animation and a talented voice cast but it doesn't live up to its title.
February 20, 2016
Graphics were beautiful, however the story & overall feel was too reminiscent of Ferngully
February 20, 2016
Tivig tvgtditdvgthdhher
February 3, 2016
A charming enough animation that's close to fairytale territory.
½ January 25, 2016
Epic has a mediocre cast and a decent story to tell, but the animation is beautiful and stunning to look at, and that is what the film needs to entertain.
½ January 23, 2016
Aside from the animation...meh.
Positives: The animation.
Negatives: Feeling that you already watched this movie because it resembles others.
½ January 3, 2016
After looking forward to seeing both "Epic" by Blue Sky Studios and "Frozen" by Disney, I saw both of them this weekend.

The main character of "Epic" looks like a twin of the main character of "Frozen". Also, one movie deals with cold vs warm and the other deals with decay vs growth. Finally, both movies rely a lot on beautiful nature shots. For these reasons, I felt I should review both together.

"Frozen" was much better than I expected. Frozen reminded me a lot of traditional Disney classics like Snow White, Dumbo or Bambi. Yes there was singing, but the singing was surprisingly traditional without sounding corny and outdated. Unlike in most cartoons that involve singing, in "Frozen" it enhanced the experience rather than being a turn-off.

"Frozen" also had a rather well-developed story. It wasn't a traditional good-vs-evil story where the good were perfect and the bad haven't got a single redeeming quality. It also wasn't yet another generic "we must remain ourselves and fight tradition" story like Mulan, Brave and so many others out there. The characters felt more real than I'm used to in a Disney flick and combined with some humor that actually works, that makes "Frozen" one of the most entertaining animations I've seen in a long time.

"Epic" was an "epic failure" in all of these area. The characters were bland and generic. The story was bland and generic and felt like they mixed "Arthur and the Minimoys", "Antz" and "Ferngully" together, then filtered until nothing interesting was left.

The humor didn't work either. As silly as the talking snowman in "Frozen" may look, he actually did work as a comic relief. His actions were funny, his words were funny and he complemented the heroes of the movie well. In "Epic", a snail and a slug served the very same purpose, only they were annoying as h***. Think Jar Jar Bing annoying and worse.

The only thing that works in "Epic" are its visuals. If I just wanted to look at pretty pictures, both "Frozen" and "Epic" would be equally beautiful. The problem is that a movie is more than pretty pictures. A movie is entertainment and needs to entertain. While "Frozen" was much better than I expected, "Epic" was much worse.
½ December 30, 2015
This film offers everything one might want or expect in an animated eco little-people themed movie. Funny, touching, beautiful with a good flow. I wish they did a sequel...
December 29, 2015
Pretty good, but not as good as rio. It has the style of animation but I didn't feel it as much in this blue sky film.
½ December 13, 2015
What a gorgeous movie!!. I was mesmerized and captivated by the incredible artwork and graphics. The animation was flawless and the story was adventurous, The celebrity voices were perfectly cast. Loved this movie!
½ November 27, 2015
This movie was anything but epic.
November 20, 2015
Beautifully rendered and well voiced, "Epic" unfortunately labours under a somewhat distracted narrative that really proves to be not much more that a bunch of spectacular set pieces woven together in to a fairly basic fairy tale.
½ November 14, 2015
The semi-entertaining family flick does have derivative similarities and typical Blue Sky elements, but it does offer epical stuff and typical charms on the beautiful animation, with the characters voiced by an appealing cast. (B)

(Full review coming soon)
½ November 8, 2015
I loved the movie ,but I did not like how the bovine dress in dead animal things.
November 4, 2015
I like this one a lot, Beyonce honestly makes it a tad better than it would be without her in it. If they had another voice for the Queen you know, can't beat the Queen B
October 26, 2015
Nice message to convey to the younger generation - and it's a nice wake up call to the older ones.
Great 'voice' by Beyoncé, Amanda, Pitbull, Colin Farrell, Steven Tyler and Chris O'dowd
½ October 16, 2015
Gorgeous to look at, but the concept is over done at this point, thus making it a tad bit of a bore.
½ October 15, 2015
it wasted a lot of potential. nice idea but under done with some painful comedy and the typical star studded cast which only brought more boringness rather than true talent. YAWN
September 16, 2015
The late great critic Roger Ebert coined a term that accurately describes a movie like "Epic." He would call it a "four-glasses-movie," which he described as any movie whose plot can be summed up on four souvenir glasses from McDonald's. "The glasses are of great value," he said, "because they hold more water than the screenplay."

That pretty much sums it up. "Epic" is an animated adventure with good technical merits; a movie in which all the imagination has gone into the impressive production design, but the story and the characters are completely canned. There's hardly a moment or a character here that isn't right off the assembly-line. It involves a teenage girl named Mary Katherine (voiced by Amanda Seyfried) who is the daughter of a brilliant scientist and a dead mother. The scientist is Dr. Bomba (voiced by Jason Sudekies), one of those Movie Scientists who runs around making calculations while wearing a ridiculous helmet that obscures his vision. He's gone around the bend, devoting all his time to proving the existence of tiny little people who live in the forest. The movie doesn't allow us any mystery into his discovery because while he's gathering information, we are introduced to the tiny people and their particular problems in the cold light of day.

The particular problems of the tiny people - known as Leafmen - aren't surprising. They involve tribal rites, heirs to the throne, tribal warfare and of course, the problem of Mary Katherine being magically transported into their world. Their world has some ingenuity. They have built an entire civilization out of the greenery of the forest, riding around on humming birds and making armor out of leaves. The hero is naïve young Nod (voiced by Josh Hutcherson from "The Hunger Games") who, not surprisingly, has a slim, chaste romance with Mary Katherine. The level-head is provided by the leader of the Leafmen named Ronin (Colin Farrell), who is strict and orderly but has no real personality beyond that. Then there's Queen Tara (voiced by Beyonce), who is onscreen only long enough to spout some ancient wisdom. These Leafmen are at war with the grey goblin people called The Boggans led by the evil Mandrake (voiced by Christoph Waltz) who is mean because, well, because the movie needs a bad guy - as if giant insects, mice, and 50 foot humans aren't hardship enough.

The environment that The Leafmen and The Boggans occupy is pretty remarkable, but the characters have no soul. Their speech is all standard, dull, boilerplate, move-the-plot-forward kind of stuff. The characters are ill-defined and ill-designed - they all look slick and plastic like Barbie Dolls. Given the advancement in computer animation, it is surprising to find characters that look like action figures.

Yet, all is not lost. There are some spaces of the movie that show the promise of what might have been. All the characters are forgettable except for the comedy relief, two slick fast-talking snails named Mub and Grub (Aziz Ansari and Chris O'Dowd respectively) who have a kind of Used Car salesman vibe. Those two troublemakers are brimming with life and energy and fun dialogue that everyone else in the film is lacking. Also around is a very interesting dog named Ozzie, the pet of Dr. Bomba. Ozzie, like the snails, is also brimming with life and energy. He's a rather curious little fellow, a pug who is as happy as a lark despite missing a leg and an eye. There's no purpose for this ailment and that lends a kind of random, unprepared, real-life quality to the character, a defining texture that the rest of the movie seems to lack.

"Epic" comes from the studio of Blue Sky animation which, after mediocre efforts like "Rio", "Horton Hears a Who", and the "Ice Age" sequels seems to excel at films that land at a B- average. It gets a pass where its rival Pixar consistently make the Dean's List.

Now for the million dollar question: Will kids enjoy it? Probably, yes. Although it won't leave them with anything to appreciate once it's over. The kids will find it briefly interesting, while parents will be checking their watches. "Epic" is two hours of eye candy that will probably make for an entertaining appetizer until "Monster's University" arrives in June. Ask your kids about it in six months and you can be guaranteed that they won't even remember having seen it, except maybe for Ozzie the dog. They'll remember him. So cute.
Page 2 of 137