Exorcist: The Version You've Never Seen - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Exorcist: The Version You've Never Seen Reviews

October 19, 2004
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
February 7, 2002
Read More | Original Score: 3/4
May 8, 2001
there's something elemental about The Exorcist, even with the new hopeful ending that betrays the bleak original.
January 1, 2000
A brilliant horror film.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/4
January 1, 2000
Catholic propaganda? Perhaps. But it's one hell of a movie.
January 1, 2000
Still jolting.
January 1, 2000
The scares were sometimes cheap, but they weren't stupid.
Read More | Original Score: 3.5/4
January 1, 2000
An expertly tuned movie.
January 1, 2000
Even better than it was in 1973.
January 1, 2000
January 1, 2000
Still a shocker.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/4
January 1, 2000
Decades later, only some parts will scare the pants off you -- but it's those parts that make this a scary trip that's very definitely worth taking again.
January 1, 2000
It's still a shock to see how young Linda Blair was; it is Regan's nymphet innocence, of course, that renders her subsequent ravings so obscene.
Full Review | Original Score: A-
January 1, 2000
Remains an effective excursion into demonic possession more than a quarter of a century after it was first unveiled to the public.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
January 1, 2000
I was more amused than scared. Jaded sensibilities of today will likely have the same reaction.
January 1, 2000
A triumph of dramatic construction as well as special effects.
January 1, 2000
The new version's amendments, for the most part, are distracting and sometimes unintentionally funny.
Read More | Original Score: C+
January 1, 2000
Seen today, in a longer version with new stereo effects, The Exorcist retains its power to shock.