Friday the 13th Part 3 - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Friday the 13th Part 3 Reviews

Page 1 of 2
July 26, 2002
Read More | Original Score: 1/5
October 10, 2001
Just in case you thought the series couldn't get any more stupid.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/10
April 19, 2002
It's in three dimensions, and all of them suck.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
September 20, 2002
Even by Part 3 of Jason's slice'n'dice expedition - this no frills horror franchise was running out of steam. 'Part 3' is more of the same - but with a lot less kick
November 9, 2003
tends to play like Dr. Tongue's 3D House of Hackneyed Sight Gags.
| Original Score: 2.5/5
September 14, 2007
So appallingly, overwhelmingly stupid that it is stupid even by the standards of the Friday the 13th franchise.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/10
February 20, 2009
The gore is surprisingly suggestive, rather than blatant, and therefore the audience doesn't quite get what it pays for.
August 6, 2008
Friday the 13th was dreadful and took in more than $17 million. Friday the 13th Part 2 was just as bad and took in more than $10 million. Friday the 13th Part III is terrible, too.
February 4, 2009
Shot in such a way to capitalize on the brief fad of Reagan-era 3D movies, there's less memorable POV shots from the killer and more images from the perspective of the victims.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
March 5, 2009
With this film, there's more sex, more nudity and more creative kills.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
June 18, 2009
...the casting director continued to find young performers who were wonderfully cute people and woefully bad actors.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/10
October 28, 2005
Another lousy 3-D gimmick that is just plain laughable on home video.
| Original Score: D
June 25, 2009
Not since Psycho has a movie taken such advantage of the phallic nature of slasher horror. [Blu-ray]
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
March 23, 2015
The Friday the 13th saga continues with this typically underwhelming entry...
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
July 21, 2006
its only distinguishing feature is the way that the sharp objects are continually thrust at the camera, before and after skewering the victims
| Original Score: 2/5
October 26, 2004
Let's see...13th x 3 = at least 39 beheadings.
Read More | Original Score: 0/5
January 1, 2000
The film was shot in 3D and looks pretty bland on video or DVD.
Read More | Original Score: 27/100
October 9, 2008
As a tried-and-true slasher film, it has its moments, but ... it grows tedious by the end.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
January 22, 2003
It was great on the big screen in 3-D, but there's really no reason to watch it on video
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
February 14, 2009
easily the worst film in the series up until that point, partially because it was so redundant, but also because it is the most technically clumsy
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Page 1 of 2