Ghostbusters 2 Reviews

June 15, 2015
The sequel is, on the whole, a fairly mechanical spook show, filled with grinning ghosts that are definitely ghoulish but hardly menacing.
May 30, 2011
An almost uniformly substandard follow-up that, since the original film remains so beloved by so many people, still gets to be disappointing even two decades and change later.
April 7, 2009
Effectively slimed everyone's fond memories of the original.
May 6, 2008
Frankly, Murray, Sigourney Weaver and even Aykroyd deserve much better.
May 30, 2007
There's very little energy in the follow-through, and this time Murray's listlessness seems more anemic than comic.
May 30, 2007
A terrible disappointment, a shockingly self-satisfied and unforgivably slapdash sequel.
June 24, 2006
The film is largely an excuse for a cast get-together, with the Ghostbusters, under judicial restraining order after the havoc wreaked in part one, suffering lives of semi-obscurity.
April 3, 2006
Feels like a blueprint concocted by the bean-counters at Columbia Pictures.
August 2, 2005
No one has ever accused Ghostbusters II of being a great film, or even a good one, for that matter
January 10, 2005
July 29, 2004
July 16, 2004
Best forgotten sequel.
January 5, 2004
January 2, 2004
November 26, 2002
July 30, 2002
January 1, 2000
You want more.