G.I. Joe: Retaliation Reviews

January 3, 2014
Did you think a second G.I. Joe movie was a good idea?
March 29, 2013
The filmmakers appear to have handed a dozen or so G.I. Joe dolls to a 9-year-old, watched him play for 110 minutes, and then shot a scene-for-scene remake.
March 29, 2013
What a blast G.I. Joe: Retaliation is! And then another blast, and another, in a series of concussive jolts that shred any conventional sense of story as thoroughly as anything since the last Michael Bay film.
March 29, 2013
When it comes to big and loud, this is the movie to beat for at least this week; what makes it entertaining is its unabashed wallow in these qualities ...
March 29, 2013
Plays like a tiresomely extended evening of channel surfing.
March 29, 2013
No go, "Joe."
March 29, 2013
Retaliation is less a sequel than an antidote to the calcified mound of crap that ostensibly inspired it.
Top Critic
March 28, 2013
What's the difference between an action figure and an action star? Very little in G.I. Joe: Retaliation, which features no performances of note, even from such combat-tested thespians as Bruce Willis, Jonathan Pryce and Dwayne Johnson.
March 28, 2013
There should be a "Fans Only" sign at the door of every theater.
March 28, 2013
I won't pretend that I had a great time watching "G.I. Joe: Retaliation."