Guns of the Magnificent Seven Reviews

  • May 09, 2018

    La deuxième suite des Sept Mercenaires change l'intégralité de son casting pour ne pas changer grand-chose en fin de compte. Beaucoup moins long et moins détaillé que les précédents, on retrouve tout de même Chris Adams (sous les traits de George Kennedy, plutôt bon) qui assemble une équipe pour sauver des villageois mexicains. Tout se centre sur une fusillade finale qui n'est pas inoubliable mais qui réussit tout de même à assurer l'essentiel. James Whitmore et Bernie Casey sortent du lot tandis que le bad guy est à peine existant. Si les Colts des Sept Mercenaires n'est pas un grand film, c'est un western tout à fait acceptable et un bon divertissement.

    La deuxième suite des Sept Mercenaires change l'intégralité de son casting pour ne pas changer grand-chose en fin de compte. Beaucoup moins long et moins détaillé que les précédents, on retrouve tout de même Chris Adams (sous les traits de George Kennedy, plutôt bon) qui assemble une équipe pour sauver des villageois mexicains. Tout se centre sur une fusillade finale qui n'est pas inoubliable mais qui réussit tout de même à assurer l'essentiel. James Whitmore et Bernie Casey sortent du lot tandis que le bad guy est à peine existant. Si les Colts des Sept Mercenaires n'est pas un grand film, c'est un western tout à fait acceptable et un bon divertissement.

  • Oct 03, 2016

    Guns of the Magnificent Seven has a better ensemble than the other sequels (not counting the newest), but it ultimately feels formulaic and slapped together. This at times causes tonal dissonance (see the scene where the blaring theme song halts when the Seven come across villagers who were hanged from telephone poles, then the music picks right back up as they move along like nothing happened). Joe Don Baker's and Bernie Casey's character arcs are totally predictable. This film is too similar to the original to really justify its existence.

    Guns of the Magnificent Seven has a better ensemble than the other sequels (not counting the newest), but it ultimately feels formulaic and slapped together. This at times causes tonal dissonance (see the scene where the blaring theme song halts when the Seven come across villagers who were hanged from telephone poles, then the music picks right back up as they move along like nothing happened). Joe Don Baker's and Bernie Casey's character arcs are totally predictable. This film is too similar to the original to really justify its existence.

  • Dec 06, 2015

    160130: The biggest problem with this film, other than the occasional flaw, is the pace. She just putts along, not quite quick enough, not quite exciting enough. Michael Ansara, as Col. Diego, makes a great villain. Decent film but following in awful big footsteps.

    160130: The biggest problem with this film, other than the occasional flaw, is the pace. She just putts along, not quite quick enough, not quite exciting enough. Michael Ansara, as Col. Diego, makes a great villain. Decent film but following in awful big footsteps.

  • Jul 20, 2015

    Well the recasting is weird. George Kennedy and Yul Bryner are nothing alike. Still, this is a great cast and fun sequel. better than the last one.

    Well the recasting is weird. George Kennedy and Yul Bryner are nothing alike. Still, this is a great cast and fun sequel. better than the last one.

  • Mar 07, 2015

    #3 in this trilogy runs out of gas

    #3 in this trilogy runs out of gas

  • Dec 06, 2014

    In the second sequel Chris (now played by George Kennedy) saves a man named Keno (Monte Markham) from a hanging. Together they aid the Mexican revolution by springing one of their leaders from prison. Of the sequels, this script and story are probably the best. But I never bought George Kennedy and the charismatic leader that pulls together an ill-fated motley crew for a prison break. The best thing I can compare this to is watching the Bond movie "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" and missing Sean Connery. Funny how the weakest entry in the series has the best script. (2.5 out of 5) So Says the Soothsayer

    In the second sequel Chris (now played by George Kennedy) saves a man named Keno (Monte Markham) from a hanging. Together they aid the Mexican revolution by springing one of their leaders from prison. Of the sequels, this script and story are probably the best. But I never bought George Kennedy and the charismatic leader that pulls together an ill-fated motley crew for a prison break. The best thing I can compare this to is watching the Bond movie "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" and missing Sean Connery. Funny how the weakest entry in the series has the best script. (2.5 out of 5) So Says the Soothsayer

  • May 05, 2014

    As Return of the Magnificent Seven was a large disappointment, I had no positive expectations for Guns of the Magnificent Seven. I simply watched it because it was there. As Guns of the Magnificent Seven even lacks the presence of actor Yul Brynner from the preceding two films in the series, it shows that the series has sunk to a certain point where it is bereft of nearly anything that made The Magnificent Seven a good film, taking only its famous name and Academy Award nominated music in a desperate attempt to appeal to the most die hard fans of the first film. While it does add George Kennedy to the cast a mere two years after he won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for his performance in the prison drama film Cool Hand Luke, the damage is already done. Guns of the Magnificent Seven is a mild improvement over its predecessor, and George Kennedy is one of the key reasons for that. While most of the cast in Guns of the Magnificent Seven are forgettable, the presence of George Kennedy is enjoyable. Thanks to his iconic voice and his easy way to step into the heroic role of Chris Adams, George Kennedy makes a strong cowboy hero for Guns of the Magnificent Seven and he puts up a good fight as a weapon toting gunfighter. George Kennedy steps into the role essentially as well as Yul Brynner did because he puts the same kind of charisma and gritty edge to his words into the role. The only reason that George Kennedy doesn't triumph Yul Brynner is because he did not originate the character and is relied on too much in the film, as well as the fact that the material presented to him is obviously crap, so he doesn?t have all that much to work with. But for what it's worth, he does more than Guns of the Magnificent Seven really deserves and therefore makes the film slightly better, although not really enough to call it entertainment. And the other entertaining aspects of Guns of the Magnificent Seven are the fact that although it uses a recycled musical score, the music in Guns of the Magnificent Seven is appealing enough to capture the atmosphere of the story and the scale of the film. And its visual aspects are decent as well because the scenery is greatly convincing in capturing the convincing nature of the west while the cinematography gets the feel of it all just right. Plus the costumes make everything feel a little bit more believable. And the action is quite entertaining. The cinematography captures the action scenes really well and it is all strongly edited, as well as maintaining strong editing of firm sound effects and a good use of the musical score. And the quantity of action is decent as well as it takes a step up from its predecessor Return of the Magnificent Seven and ties more into its running time of 105 minutes so that there is a better balance between the random dramatic themes and climactic action moments. Guns of the Magnificent Seven is certainly entertaining during its action scenes, and if the film was solely focused on them and George Kennedy then it could have been a much greater film than it was. But still, Guns of the Magnificent Seven collapses under the weight of its negative qualities, essentially the same negative qualities that come from every other generic western film. Among the few reasons that Guns of the Magnificent Seven transcend the quality of its predecessor are the fact that its story is not a desperate rehash of its predecessor. As the series has lost all of its importance and cultural relevance and merely sunk into being a generic series of western films, Guns of the Magnificent Seven is the first in the series to attempt to stand its own ground, although it really should not have the name of the series. Unfortunately, it cannot stand because it is nothing but another formulaic western entry into the series. Although thanks to the theme of the action and the fact that the movie was filmed in Spain it can be characterised as a spaghetti western, it isn't easy to characterise it as a good one. Like its predecessor, the story is not compelling. It doesn't attempt to desperately copy the first film in The Magnificent Seven series, but doesn't make an effort to be original either. The story does borrow elements from the preceding two films lightly, but it doesn't make an effort to have a compelling story at its grip so it is hard to really find yourself enjoying a film like Guns of the Magnificent Seven. Only fans of the most simplistic and generic western films are likely to enjoy Guns of the Magnificent Seven because its generic cowboy characters and basic plot give it nothing to allow it to stand out from a crowd. I didn't hate the film or find it that annoying, but I certainly found it to be a boring film because of its repetitive nature and lack of surprises. You can't expect surprises from Guns of the Magnificent Seven, but if you know what constitutes a formulaic western film then you should be able to expect everything else. Guns of the Magnificent Seven fails to transcend the generic western roots it is trapped within, and so audiences entertainment value will occur as such, but Guns of the Magnificent Seven is certainly not a western film that I would find myself recommending to anybody except for the strongest George Kennedy fans. So Guns of the Magnificent Seven is an improvement over its predecessor due to a higher quantity of decent action scenes and the presence of George Kennedy in the lead role, but aside from that Guns of the Magnificent Seven is simply another generic entry into the series without a great plot or enough entertainment value to truly be a good viewing experience.

    As Return of the Magnificent Seven was a large disappointment, I had no positive expectations for Guns of the Magnificent Seven. I simply watched it because it was there. As Guns of the Magnificent Seven even lacks the presence of actor Yul Brynner from the preceding two films in the series, it shows that the series has sunk to a certain point where it is bereft of nearly anything that made The Magnificent Seven a good film, taking only its famous name and Academy Award nominated music in a desperate attempt to appeal to the most die hard fans of the first film. While it does add George Kennedy to the cast a mere two years after he won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for his performance in the prison drama film Cool Hand Luke, the damage is already done. Guns of the Magnificent Seven is a mild improvement over its predecessor, and George Kennedy is one of the key reasons for that. While most of the cast in Guns of the Magnificent Seven are forgettable, the presence of George Kennedy is enjoyable. Thanks to his iconic voice and his easy way to step into the heroic role of Chris Adams, George Kennedy makes a strong cowboy hero for Guns of the Magnificent Seven and he puts up a good fight as a weapon toting gunfighter. George Kennedy steps into the role essentially as well as Yul Brynner did because he puts the same kind of charisma and gritty edge to his words into the role. The only reason that George Kennedy doesn't triumph Yul Brynner is because he did not originate the character and is relied on too much in the film, as well as the fact that the material presented to him is obviously crap, so he doesn?t have all that much to work with. But for what it's worth, he does more than Guns of the Magnificent Seven really deserves and therefore makes the film slightly better, although not really enough to call it entertainment. And the other entertaining aspects of Guns of the Magnificent Seven are the fact that although it uses a recycled musical score, the music in Guns of the Magnificent Seven is appealing enough to capture the atmosphere of the story and the scale of the film. And its visual aspects are decent as well because the scenery is greatly convincing in capturing the convincing nature of the west while the cinematography gets the feel of it all just right. Plus the costumes make everything feel a little bit more believable. And the action is quite entertaining. The cinematography captures the action scenes really well and it is all strongly edited, as well as maintaining strong editing of firm sound effects and a good use of the musical score. And the quantity of action is decent as well as it takes a step up from its predecessor Return of the Magnificent Seven and ties more into its running time of 105 minutes so that there is a better balance between the random dramatic themes and climactic action moments. Guns of the Magnificent Seven is certainly entertaining during its action scenes, and if the film was solely focused on them and George Kennedy then it could have been a much greater film than it was. But still, Guns of the Magnificent Seven collapses under the weight of its negative qualities, essentially the same negative qualities that come from every other generic western film. Among the few reasons that Guns of the Magnificent Seven transcend the quality of its predecessor are the fact that its story is not a desperate rehash of its predecessor. As the series has lost all of its importance and cultural relevance and merely sunk into being a generic series of western films, Guns of the Magnificent Seven is the first in the series to attempt to stand its own ground, although it really should not have the name of the series. Unfortunately, it cannot stand because it is nothing but another formulaic western entry into the series. Although thanks to the theme of the action and the fact that the movie was filmed in Spain it can be characterised as a spaghetti western, it isn't easy to characterise it as a good one. Like its predecessor, the story is not compelling. It doesn't attempt to desperately copy the first film in The Magnificent Seven series, but doesn't make an effort to be original either. The story does borrow elements from the preceding two films lightly, but it doesn't make an effort to have a compelling story at its grip so it is hard to really find yourself enjoying a film like Guns of the Magnificent Seven. Only fans of the most simplistic and generic western films are likely to enjoy Guns of the Magnificent Seven because its generic cowboy characters and basic plot give it nothing to allow it to stand out from a crowd. I didn't hate the film or find it that annoying, but I certainly found it to be a boring film because of its repetitive nature and lack of surprises. You can't expect surprises from Guns of the Magnificent Seven, but if you know what constitutes a formulaic western film then you should be able to expect everything else. Guns of the Magnificent Seven fails to transcend the generic western roots it is trapped within, and so audiences entertainment value will occur as such, but Guns of the Magnificent Seven is certainly not a western film that I would find myself recommending to anybody except for the strongest George Kennedy fans. So Guns of the Magnificent Seven is an improvement over its predecessor due to a higher quantity of decent action scenes and the presence of George Kennedy in the lead role, but aside from that Guns of the Magnificent Seven is simply another generic entry into the series without a great plot or enough entertainment value to truly be a good viewing experience.

  • Aug 30, 2013

    Third movie in the Magnificent Seven series. Acting crew has been replaced, while character of Chris is the same character. This time around a cousin of one of the Mexicans is looking for help to break their leader out of prison. Of course, everyone in Mexico is a cousin.

    Third movie in the Magnificent Seven series. Acting crew has been replaced, while character of Chris is the same character. This time around a cousin of one of the Mexicans is looking for help to break their leader out of prison. Of course, everyone in Mexico is a cousin.

  • Jan 05, 2013

    Solid western. Not a sequel as much as it is a remake in a way. Bernie Casey and Joe Don Baker were amazing together and you really get to seem them work well before they get real famous.

    Solid western. Not a sequel as much as it is a remake in a way. Bernie Casey and Joe Don Baker were amazing together and you really get to seem them work well before they get real famous.

  • May 13, 2012

    not as good as even the 2nd one

    not as good as even the 2nd one