Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Reviews

Page 1 of 13
August 3, 2013
Prisoner of Azkaban lacks the depth that those of us old enough to drive may have enjoyed in the earlier Potter installments.
June 4, 2004
While voluptuously bringing to luscious life the kid-lit world of witchcraft, wizardry and bizarre creatures, has script and plotting as bland as the Hardy Boys.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
June 10, 2004
Even though Azkaban in many ways is a far more accomplished film than its predecessors, it comes dangerously close to shutting out the nonreader.
Read More | Original Score: C+
June 4, 2004
A spell whose effect - though effectively and expertly cast - will not likely last much longer than the time it takes to watch it.
June 2, 2004
nothing much happens to enhance any of the characters aside from the tenuous hand-holding of Ron and Hermione - and Azkaban generates very little energy along the way
| Original Score: 2.5/5
June 3, 2004
It is perfect evidence for the obvious truth Potter fans must face. The only great Harry Potter movies will be those we create in our minds as readers.
Full Review| Original Score: 2.5/4
June 3, 2004
At some point you have to start asking with all the mystical potions and gifts of foresight, how do these wizards keep fingering the wrong people for these crimes?
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 8, 2004
Cuarón's involvement should have made this the best of the series, but "'Prisoner'" once again falls prey to author Rowling's tendency towards a lack of sophistication.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
December 6, 2005
Two and a half hours of neck-cramping semi-entertainment.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
June 3, 2004
Audiences won't be wild about this "Harry" with its dark, humorless approach
Full ReviewRead More | Original Score: 4/10
June 12, 2004
The Prisoner of Azkaban is basically a routine vehicle that plods its way through details without giving much incentive to feel engaged by the specifics.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
May 27, 2004
Much like a child going through puberty, the maturation of the Harry Potter franchise has yielded awkward growing pains for the third film in the series.
June 18, 2004
Though Harry's now a teenager, Daniel Radcliffe hasn't grown an inch as an actor. No charmer, Radcliffe is barely the British version of Macaulay Culkin.
May 27, 2004
A dark and sombre film that is spookier but less amusing than the first two.
June 4, 2004
This chapter leaves me little enthused for the future.
Full Review | Original Score: C-
December 6, 2005
What we're treated to is less a story than a series of vignettes.
Read More | Original Score: 2.5/5
June 16, 2004
[It] has moments that come alive, but is confined by an attitude that fantasy needn't pertain to anything beyond itself.
Full ReviewRead More
June 1, 2004
It isn't worth sitting through almost two-and-a-half hours of a movie without enough for anyone other than a certified Potter fan.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 3, 2004
...there is very little about this bloated package that delivered anything of great impact, particularly its story-line...
Full Review | Original Score: 5/10
June 3, 2004
The silliest, as well as the most contrived -- and confusing -- of them all.
Page 1 of 13