Jobs (2013)
TOMATOMETER
AUDIENCE SCORE
Critic Consensus: An ambitious but skin-deep portrait of an influential, complex figure, Jobs often has the feel of an over-sentimentalized made-for-TV biopic.
Jobs Videos
Jobs Photos
Movie Info
Watch it now
People Who Like this movie also like
Cast
as Steve Jobs
as Steve Wozniak
as John Sculley
as Arthur Rock
as Clara Jobs
as Rod Holt
as Chris-Ann Brennan
as Bill Fernandez
as Paul Jobs
as Gil Amelio
as Jack Dudman
as Bill Atkinson
as Chris Espinosa
as Andy Hertzfeld
as Mike Markkula
as Daniel Kottke
as Burrell Smith
as Jef Raskin
as Paul Terrell
as Jonathan Ive
as Ed Woolard
as Gareth Chang
as Al Alcorn
as Ken Tanaka
as Laurene Jobs
as Lisa Jobs
as Reed Jobs
as Julie
as Apple Designer #1
as Student At Lounge
as Computer Professor
as Calligraphy Professor
as Homebrew Attendee
as Francis
as Jobs Secretary
as Jobs Attorney
as Financial Expert
as Apple Receptionist
as Board Member #1
as Jud
as Apple Engineer
as Zen Roshi
as 1980 News Caster
as Ethan
as Girl In Bedroom Estate
as Pilot
News & Interviews for Jobs
Critic Reviews for Jobs
All Critics (124) | Top Critics (37) | Fresh (34) | Rotten (90) | DVD (1)
It's a film whose plea to the audience resembles Jobs' appeal to the crowd in that iPod-unveiling scene: "Believe this is important and exciting," it asks, "because I say so."
The irony is that a man who treasured innovation and sleek, stylish design should be the subject of a film that's so bland and bloated.
Other than people who are mildly curious about the guy who put the smartphone in their pocket and the tablet computer in their knapsack, I'm not sure who "Jobs" was made for.
Jobs is the equivalent of a feature-length slow clap.

A missed opportunity.
Like the man it's about, "Jobs" is thin and unassuming, but keeps surprising you with ideas and innovation.
Audience Reviews for Jobs
Actually, kind of dull. I was interested to see this one, but I found it patchy and not detailed enough. Particularly in his personal life it jumps around an awful lot. Ashton does an okay job. I'm not his biggest fan, but he pulls it off, particularly in his later years, would actually not have recognized him. He manages to tone the ham right down, thankfully. It's an okay movie. One to watch once and forget about.
Super Reviewer
This is quite possibly the most pretentious, and yet most likely truthful, depiction of Steve Jobs. There's definitely a rushed quality to the entire production, since this film came out shortly after Jobs' death, but it still feels like a legitimate bio-pic. Still, its lack of vision shows in its lame performances. The beginning of the film shows a mellow, advantageous Jobs, who doesn't wear shoes and is offered rainbow colored tabs of acid in a country field where he watches the stars. He's a sullen genius who won't get a college degree and yet hangs around Reed College, learning calligraphy and philosophy, which of course makes him a hipster's dream date. As the story speeds along, this sweet faced portrayal morphs, and we meet the contentious Jobs: the obsessive man who used everyone who loved him in order to climb the ladder and become the huge prick he would eventually become. He doesn't give any respect to Apple's founding members, he doesn't acknowledge his daughter, and he acts like everyone around him are idiots. To the movie's credit, that is not the afterglow portrayal of the wunderkind Steve Jobs that everyone was expecting. Though there is that negative view, he is also shown as a genius, smarter than everyone around him, including his own staff. He is also shown to be smarter than his entire board, who only seem to want to make money rather than follow their delusional founder down the rabbit hole. The beginning, which should have been the end, is a flash forward to the Jobs we know now. In the end, we still haven't gotten to that point, and so we end with this ham-fisted version of Jobs, who only seems to care about himself even after a film that tries to show he changed. Though I give applause for the way things were handled, the film was still structured poorly, and everything about this production was pure ham.
Super Reviewer
At some levels, it works and would have worked, but it fails in the certain cliches that befall too many contemporary, commercialized films. To read the book is better.
Super Reviewer
Discussion Forum
Discuss Jobs on our Movie forum!