Live Forever (Live Forever: The Rise and Fall of Brit Pop) - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Live Forever (Live Forever: The Rise and Fall of Brit Pop) Reviews

Page 1 of 6
July 7, 2016
...a comprehensive rock 'n roll documentary detailing the rise and fall of the Britpop in the 1990s...
January 22, 2016
Interesting documentary about the 90's Brit Pop, specially Oasis, Blur and Pulp.
½ September 3, 2014
This documentary is a really good look at the rise and fall of Britpop. The interviews and the soundtrack are really good. A must see for any fan of Britpop.
January 10, 2014
Bristol isnt just about Blur,Oasis and Pulp
½ November 17, 2012
Meat and potatoes doc.
March 4, 2012
A documentary for everyone who was a part of the Britpop movement in the 90's - the rise and fall of it.
October 17, 2011
not something of my interest
October 17, 2011
I should probably check this out.
½ August 2, 2011
Muy buen documental!
July 16, 2011
Documental sin eje, que consiste en reportajes intercalados a estrellas de los 90s hablando de cualquier cosa. Y ni siquiera buenos reportajes. Parece un documental para VH1, pero fallido.
May 22, 2011
Ideal para entender porque fuimos tan "modernos" en los 90'.
May 8, 2011
The thoroughly entertaining documentary "Live Forever: The Rise and Fall of Britpop" has a knack for spinning chaos into cohesion. Resolution, however, is another matter. It does seem strange for working artists to be reminiscing about the salad days of, oh, about six or seven years prior. But the movie's brisk pace and multitude of perspectives - as well as the brief vogue period of Britpop itself - sublimate the symptoms of Too Soon Syndrome. One thinks that the perception of Noel and Liam Gallagher's, shall we say, "accelerated" mortality may have also been an impetus for getting their side of the story on film.

"Live Forever" was clearly made with a British audience in mind. Even if you (as I) were a fan of the mid-90s wave of homegrown U.K. rock bands, the film is somewhat axiomatic of the "two nations separated by a common language" construction of Anglo-American relations. Americans, when referred to, are a mixture of rubberneckers, neophytes, and philistines. I can understand. Britpop was a reactionary movement for a generation that didn't buy into the melancholy of American grunge. It's easy to imagine a fair amount of consternation rising from Edinburgh to Bristol when us Yanks posited Seattle as a symbol of post-industrial gloom.

The resulting account of the music and the times is wry, witty, and sometimes beautifully absurd. Some voices are understated, some are provocative, and some are Damon Albarn. But the guileless Gallaghers are the true stars of the movie. They are a two-man demystifying crew, not so much for their stories of typical rock band wankery but for their alternatively deep and dismissive views of Britpop's cultural impact. They don't seem bowled over by their past or supposedly catalyzing a new British patriotisma. They're relics from a former era in rock but inexplicably forward-looking and free from lament, not the hosts of a long-awaited cultural banquet but a glorious bender where living forever meant just living in the moment.
April 16, 2011
Like the Loaded and NME articles that it references this is very glossy but largely a very unsatisfying delve into the music of 90's Britain. If you didn't want to take part in the film then basically you didn't exist. The Charlatans, The Verve, Manic Street Preachers and even Radiohead don't ellicit a single mention yet loads of screen time is given to people like Ozwald Boateng and Damien Hirst? The theory doesn't make sense either...Brit-Pop rose up with New Labour apparently, like yeah we know it pre-dated that but it was like a feeling you know...but then Brit-Pop died out with 'Be Here Now' released in 97...what? You mean when New Labour had just come into office? Then we have Massive Attack who were supposedly part of the movement (not really though were they?) so how do they fit into that theory? Mezzanine came out in 97/98 and is one of the best albums of the past 30 years. The film is basically then, a mess, but on the basic level of some funny quotes from the Gallaghers and Cocker and some moody avoidances from Albarn it's worth watching. There is a great film to be made about this era of music, my era of music...but this isn't it.
October 17, 2010
3/4, B+, 80%, or Fresh.

Live Forever: The Rise and Fall of Britpop is a chronological story about the rise of British music in the early 90s to its ultimate demise in the late 90s.

Britpop, more or less, is the backlash against the American grunge wave from generation Xers. With the rise of bands like Nirvana, many British bands in the early 90s started mimicking American music and culture. But with the death of Kurt Cobain in 1994 and the so-called 'xenophobic' attitudes British people had, wanting to return to national pride, they started listening to bands that resembled what was British invasion in the United States.

Albums released during this time, including the Britpop epoch albums such as Parklife from Blur and (What's the Story) Morning Glory? by Oasis, lyrics centered towards British culture. For example, many songs on Parklife can only be described as British, for example Bank Holiday, which is a basic summary of the event that happens six times a year, Girls and Boys, which pokes fun of pan-sexuality and hedonistic attitudes the British culture had in the 90s, as well as adding in Phil Daniels, a popular British actor for the voice of the title track, and Clover Over Dover, which is a town in south east England. While Oasis wasn't as overly into alienating American audiences as Blur was, Wonderwall, their biggest hit, included the lyrics, "Backbeat, words on the street that your fire in your heart is out" and "Backbeat" was the nickname for George Harrison of The Beatles, the epoch of British bands.

Album sales indicated this: Blur didn't even go gold until their eponymous release (more on that later) and the sales of Oasis' first two albums in the United States were a combined total of five million albums.

Live Forever has interviews with various figurehands of the most popular Britpop bands, such as Damon Albarn of Blur, Noel and Liam Gallagher (although separate) of Oasis, Jarvis Crocker of Pulp (although Pulp could be summarized as a one-album wonder), and more.

It also talks about the sweeping differences in politics in the 90s, going from the Conservative Party of Thatcherism to the Labour Party of Tony Blair and particularly how Blair and the Labour Party aligned themselves towards the youth of Britain by supporting the Britpop movement. However, later it was revealed that the politicians cared little about what they said and did it only for publicity.

The height of Britpop, the summer of 1995, brought the heavyweights of Blur and Oasis to the table. Oasis was releasing their second single from their second album, (What's the Story) Morning Glory?, Roll With It, on August 14, 1995 and Blur was going to release their first single from their fourth album, The Great Escape, a week from that day, but Damon and the band was determined to potentially dethrone it from number one as, rumor had it, Liam Gallagher and Damon Albarn were at the same party and Liam screamed to Damon, "number one!" after their first single, Some Might Say, went to number one. So Damon pushed Country House to the same date as Roll With It.

This was it. South Britain (Blur) verses North Britain (Oasis). Working class (Oasis) verses middle class (Blur). Urban (Blur) verses rural (Oasis). Blur "won the battle", selling 274,000 copies to Oasis' 216,000, and ironically would be Blur's first number one song in the United Kingdom, but Oasis "won the war", as they had two number one hits from the same album (the previously mentioned Some Might Say and the later released Don't Look Back in Anger, which features Noel on vocals), while Blur's other singles did fairly well in the United Kingdom, they did not leave the same impression that Oasis had left as Oasis sold over four million copies of (What's the Story) Morning Glory? in the United Kingdom alone, and Blur had only sold one million that same year, which wasn't even as many as their previous effort, Parklife.

1997 was the year Britpop declined. Oasis' third album expectations were so high I don't think it was humanly possible to even achieve it. They released Be Here Now, which critics often cite as the beginning of the end for Britpop. Touted as over-produced and with poor vocals and writing, Be Here Now didn't sell half of what (What's the Story) Morning Glory? did, however, they still managed to outsell Blur's most popular effort, Parklife.

What the movie did not tell you was, that, while Britpop was in decline in 1997, it still did pretty well. The Verve had their third album, and their one-album wonder (in United States they were simply a one-hit wonder), in 1997 called Urban Hymns, with the massive hit in both United Kingdom and the United States, Bittersweet Symphony, which managed to go to number 2 in the UK and 12 in the US.

And another thing: they never even mentioned Blur's shift to lo-fi in 1997, which would be a huge blow to Britpop. Blur's eponymous album, for the first time drawing influences from American music, would go on to sell more in the United States than in the United Kingdom, although all four singles would be in the top-20 in the United Kingdom and Blur, being only a two-hit wonder in the US, had their second hit Song 2 which went up to 55 in the Billboard Hot 100. But nonetheless, their music was certainly not Britpop anymore, and would not even come close to it until their reunion in 2008 as they released a single out in 2010, with only 1,000 vinyl copies in the UK and a free download on their official website, entitled Fools Day, which has an entirely new sound for Blur that is still reminiscent of their older work and relates to the British man more, with lyrics like, "Another day on this little island".

And while this was released in 2003, they did not once mentioned the rise of post-Britpop in 2000 with the debut of Coldplay's first album, Parachutes, which made a huge impact on both sides of the ocean. I was kind of disappointed with that.

I definitely don't think this is the definitive answer you are looking for, if you are looking for a movie that will explain everything past and present about Britpop, but it still does a decent job. If you like this movie, I recommend the CD Maximum Blur which documents Blur's beginning from before they were even Seymour to their sixth album, 13.

Had it focused a little more instead of showing clips of music videos and given interviews with the cover band Wonderwall this would be a 90% or a 100%. But it didn't.
½ October 13, 2010
todo bien todo bien, pero que manga de pelotudos todos.. por favor. callense y hagan música nomas..
July 15, 2010
they should just do a documentary on liam. no, seriously, i wish trip hop was explored more in this film. It seems to have held up quite well compared to some of the other sounds of the era.
½ June 28, 2010
There's something absolutely fascinating to me about this moment in time. I was technically old enough to have been really into the mid-90s music movements that happened both here and in Britain, ranging in age from 11 in 1994 to 15 in 1998. In all likelihood I was almost prime age, given a few years. The problem was, at the time, I was too unsure of how to be cool enough to listen to this stuff. I still kind of feel that way, like maybe Blur and Damon Albarn are too cool for me to listen to. The difference is that now I'm old enough not to care.
The beauty of this documentary is that it captures most of the major players in the Britpop movement at the perfect moment in time. Tthey're all older and somewhat wiser, at least old enough to look back and wise enough to realize what it all really meant. It's the classic tale of the anti-establishment becoming the establishment, and how quickly it can all happen. It's kind of disheartening to know that we'll always be looking for change and as soon as it's acheived, desperately searching for more.
This is a documentary about more than music, it's about politics, it's about culture, it's about the corporate desires to control all of those things. It's both slightly depressing and amazingly entertaining.
The only thing that takes a while to get used to is the lack of structure, as I've come to be conditioned to expect. The interviews are free-flowing and that's where the honesty comes from. One of the most entertaining things is the juxtaposition of the Gallagher brothers, which is beyond brilliant most times. If Noel would agree to it, I wish that the Gallagher brothers had been charged with taking on The Tonight Show. Sure it would only last that one night, but can you imagine?! I'll let it stew for a while in your brain, much like this documentary will should you choose to watch it.
June 1, 2010
I just saw this for the first time and really enjoyed it. The only complaint I have is that it was too short!
Super Reviewer
May 17, 2010
Blur are only more respectable than Oasis because they dont actually believe they are better than the Beatles, and therefore Jesus. And therefore every other band to exist, except for the awesome christian rock band that Jesus played drums and sang backup vocals on, called the "I am great plus 8 Christ trio".
½ February 15, 2010
Some interesting interviews, as well as some humorous moments, but I expected this documentary to delve a little further than the surface of Britpop. Suggested for those who are unfamiliar with the genre, but not die-hards.
Page 1 of 6