Marathon Man - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Marathon Man Reviews

Page 2 of 56
½ August 18, 2015
You Can Easily Do Something Else & Still Take This In.. Trust Me, There Are Parts Worth Skimming Over As It Is Basically A Cobfusing, Boring Story, Mixed With Parts Of Extreme Terror..An Unfortunate Viewing Experience With Little Satisfaction.
August 12, 2015
A good film that manages to milk some effective suspense out of its needlessly convoluted plot. Kudos for not making the old Nazi villains any more cliched and exaggerated than they needed to be.
July 27, 2015
Good movie. While the plot gets muddled toward the middle of the film, and alliances get crossed and double-crossed and triple-crossed, it still has a thrilling plot line with great action, solid direction, and great performances from its cast, especially Olivier and Hoffman. It does get slow at moments, taking away from the escapism, but is still a good movie.
July 8, 2015
Wow, this movie was really great. A little strange and confusing at one point, but quickly made sense and finished with a solid 3 stars from me
July 2, 2015
Marathon Man is a decent conspiracy thriller starring the great Dustin Hoffman. The Performances and cast are solid, the story is engaging and the film is intense at times. That being said, the film seems split down the middle. The first half struggles to coherently explain the premise, feels distanced from the second half, the love interest felt rushed, and more focus was on Roy Scheider rather than Dustin Hoffman. Marathon Man overall is very enjoyable, though slightly convoluted with a few disposable plot threads and two unequally engaging halves that render the film slightly disjointed.
June 19, 2015
Taut thriller adapted from William Goldman's novel about a graduate history student who unwittingly gets caught up in the middle of an international conspiracy involving an exiled Nazi war criminal. Brilliant performances from Hoffman and Oliver, with some iconic scenes and bravura moments...but there are far too many obvious story holes, which bog the whole film down. Great scene with people recognizing Oliver in the street and ends in someones throat getting slit.
June 12, 2015
I really enjoyed this movie. It had one of the more interesting confrontation/climax scenes. The actors were all fantastic in this as well. I also wouldn't be surprised if Eric Kripke drew inspiration from it for Supernatural given how the brothers interacted. At times it came off like CIA!Dean and grad student!Sam
½ June 10, 2015
Just (re)watch this fantastic movie, even with a few dated moments it holds up 110%. I am longing for movies like this with great storyline, directing, cinematography, acting, sound and editing.
June 4, 2015
A true thriller classic. One will never be the same after hearing the dentist drill again! Hoffman is a student who becomes involved with an escaped Nazi war criminal. The sub-story of what happens to a non-violent acidemic when pushed too far is one of Hoffman best preformances. Scheider and Olivier have two of the most memorable preformances which strengthing Marathon Man's dark story of violence and lies. One of the best movies of the 1970's Watch it!
½ May 18, 2015
"Is it safe?!"

Crusty old Nazis, hidden switch blades, torture scenes, a ridiculous 70s score, and a ripped Dustin Hoffman. What more could you want?
½ April 30, 2015
This may look like a certain kind of film but this is a lot different than it may look, 'Marathon Man' is a very well crafted mystery. This is a very intriguing film that has some excellent build up; my eyes were glued to the screen. This is a very slow burner of a film that really develops our characters before things get troublesome for our characters; these characters have great introductions and it takes Laurence Olivier a little while before he even speaks. The acting is great across the board, especially from the impressive commitment by Dustin Hoffman, from an excellent cast that the filmmakers dreamed to have even if it hard to believe they pictured Olivier in this role; he had his reasons as well but still. I really couldn't stop being reminding of JFK from looking at William Devane. From reading the line, 'Is it safe?' I thought Olivier's character would have to be protected by Hoffman's but oh boy was that wrong. Also, from the way the camera was moving in Babe's apartment I thought he would reveal himself to be impersonating a detective. There's a scene where a character is revealed to be a double agent and the way that scene finishes with him walking toward to camera with the reveal of Szell walking back into the dentist/torture room was just excellently filmed. Also, even the actor that played the father was great as he looked similar to his sons so it makes it feel all the more realistic.

The story in this film is unpredictable and very inventive, it has great twists and turns and remains interesting and involving throughout and it even made me laugh sometimes as well. William Goldman wrote the script for his own story as usual and he and Dustin Hoffman had pretty good years in '76 and well as Hoffman reuniting with Schlesinger. Like I said, Dustin Hoffman did a great job in this film and for the most part is convincing for his age that he is supposed to be but his voice is quite deep for someone of that age, as well as Elsa, she seemed older than a typical student as well, but, hey, not all students are the same age. There was a point in film he will actually get away with it and while I'm always one for a film to break convention, this was the one time you really want to see the villain get what they deserve. Of course, when the final scene does happen you know what's going to be thrown in the water and that the gun will end up on the ground but it is hugely satisfying to watch, as is the whole films. And when will villains learn to not leave their valuables on the ground. I thought Babe would spit back at the end of that scene because it happened to him but, no, he's more mature than that. And, hey, it looks like all that running paid off, even if, after the film develops, that whole plot point of he runs felt like set up just for one escape scene. The torture scene is iconic for a reason but I do wonder what else we missed, seeing as how it was cut down because of preview audiences reactions. There's also some lines I found funny with, 'Elsa!', 'Just let her go', and, 'This is madness... Madness', I mean, wow.

The film has excellent cinematography and editing, the scenes at the start with the car incident were great to watch and had me bracing myself for a crash and it happened again when it transitioned into someone playing pinball or opening a book. The camera zooms out just a little for the credits and even that works perfectly. Although, in the running scene at the start I really couldn't understand what either Hoffman or the person he was chasing was saying, and why did he keep his watch in his jumper like that? It might have fallen out. I thought in that car scene though that that person who stalled was planting a bomb because of his crafty actions earlier on with a cigarette box, and honestly, what was the point of that? We see Roy Scheider's character with it and it looks like he's hiding that so I thought that would be the big secret everyone was hiding but in the next scene we see a character eating out of it with the chocolate that was originally in there. Did I miss something? Was it just for his own personal use and he had to hide it and nothing more? It just fades out after a while. Didn't the person with the pram have it as well at one point?

I thought Roy Scheider's character, at first, was Babe's counsellor or something seeing as how he was called Doc and he wrote a letter to him; I thought it odd why he would be so aggressive about Babe's papers about his father but it makes sense now and the coincidences of that character being involved with Olivier's ceases. However, there are still some things that seemed very coincidental. I can't say the character's name for spoiler reasons, but what about if Babe hadn't have hidden that book? Those two wouldn't have been able to meet then; sure, the other character could have met up with him again at some point but what about if he decided to walk away or something? The whole plan would crumble then. I actually did think that her character was some sort of spy as that would explain why those guys in the park jumped them but that is explained for different reasons. Also, Babe should have stayed in the bathroom and stayed as quiet for as long as he could and have at least tried to get out of the window and he should have taken his flannel off faster than he did. Of course, when a character is killed, and then that other character is told to keep walking into the shadows, I think we all knew what was going to happen, even if don't really understand the football part. A warning? Sure, of course it was, but why a football? Also, why was that owner of that shop just eating right in the middle of his shop? Who does that? And later on when Doc goes to the theatre, someone has died and I thought it was another model at first, but before that, he talked to wrong person, it's hard to see in the dark I know but it was still another addition of some humor. And when Babe needs some help as he is clearly in distress, that guy asked, 'what's in it for me?' Really? Why would you do that?

Also, you'd have thought that people would have checked an abandoned pram. As well as the moment when Doc walks into Babe's apartment after his encounter and I remember reading that they don't actually draw around bodies like that. And Szell has a pretty useless bodyguard that didn't even do anything when Doc slapped him. I thought the fact that Babe gets taken back to his childhood house at the end was coincidental but it gets explained soon after. I found it a bit coincidental nearing the end when Szell goes to that town, really? Out of all the people in the world, is it really likely that people are going to recognise him? Especially with different hair? And why would he have used his real name anyway? Sure, you could argue when he was doing his horrible things in the war he would have used his real name because he had the power and didn't feel threatened but still. Of course, the scene ends with an obvious collision with a car and he goes about his merry way. But wouldn't he know what town he was in? Couldn't he have gone anywhere else? And I find it hard to believe nobody saw what he did at the end of that scene, and the injury that other person had doesn't just randomly happen, people will know it was a cut. That scene really didn't come back into play later, either.

I've looked up alternate versions for this film because it's apparently 2 hours and 5 minutes but the version I saw was just exactly 2 hours, but none seem to exist. Regardless, 'Marathon Man' is an excellent film and an example of the way that thrillers should be done. I also like the poster as well and the tagline, 'A thriller', as it leaves things open and doesn't really let you know anything about the unique thrill ride you are about to witness, which is something that modern thrillers need to learn how to do. I might have had a few things to say about the film but that really doesn't detract from the film at all and they are just some very odd things I picked up on. It's a cliché to say but they really don't put the same amount of effort into films like this anymore, as they once did. Smart, unique and effortlessly watchable, 'Marathon Man' is a perfect example of how to craft a thriller and undeniably has everything that belongs in a '70s film.
½ April 23, 2015
Proved that non-horror movies can be chilling and creepy. Laurence Olivier gives a chilling performance that is unforgettable.
½ March 9, 2015
I like a good mind-bending movie where I have to puzzle out exactly what is going on. However I usually prefer if it's a symptom of a complex plot, unlike Marathon Man where the plot is quite basic but they refuse to talk about it until about half-way through the film. It's really aggravating watching just random scenes spliced together and trying to track it all when I have no framework for why any of it is happening until after Dustin Hoffman is taken captive for the infamous "Is it safe?!" scene. Let me save others the trouble if you decide to watch this movie. There's this old retired Nazi who's been hiding out in the middle of nowhere living off of diamonds that his brother stores for him in New York. However, when his brother dies, he must venture into New York himself to gather the rest of his diamonds. I'm going to avoid going into all the spoilers about how Dustin Hoffman gets involved, but that is the basic information I wish I knew going in so I could make some sense of this film. Of course even with that information I don't know if Marathon Man would have worked all that well for me. It still takes a ridiculously long time for Hoffman and Roy Scheider to connect the 2 disparate stories they spend the first half setting up.

What I will say is that when the story was actually in full swing I found it riveting. I did tense up out of concern for Hoffman and started to get invested, wondering what would happen next. I also liked the way Marathon Man handled flashbacks, showing us just enough to understand what happened and why it made an impact on Hoffman. The acting performances are also quite good which is what you'd expect with that cast list. I think I just expected more. Even in the most famous scene, where Hoffman is being tortured, I had heard so much about it so I expected something considerably worse. The actual scene seemed mild compared to my expectations. The whole film lacked the kind of classic movie magic I anticipated, and even the ending was a bit of a let down. I don't want to dissuade anyone who has interest in exploring Marathon Man, because it's certainly not a horrible film. But I would temper your expectations and be prepared for a very slow start (which includes an absolutely stupid car crash that gets the plot rolling.) I wanted to like Marathon Man more, but sadly it didn't go the distance.
½ February 26, 2015
Really good Dustin Hoffman flick. This was also my first Lawrence Olivier movie as well and I got to say, he's made quiet an impression on me. The torture scene for this movie too is one for the ages
½ February 26, 2015
Really good Dustin Hoffman flick. This was also my first Lawrence Olivier movie as well and I got to say, he's made quiet an impression on me. The torture scene for this movie too is one for the ages
February 15, 2015
Despite this film's opening thirty-five minutes being mind-numilingly slow, the film picks up pace and becomes a very fun thriller thanks to fun performances from Dustin Hoffman and Laurence Olivier.
½ February 7, 2015
A sometimes turgid, often transparent thriller carried by an immediate pace and a handful of chilling scenes with Laurence Olivier's memorable villain.
November 3, 2014
Superb filmmaking, and writing, and acting. An all-around masterpiece.
½ October 17, 2014
Hugely disappointing. It's a weak thriller if you even want to call it a thriller. I found it a little confusing, and didn't feel that everything really tied together. (First and only viewing - 10/16/2014)
July 15, 2014
I give the film credit for having a daring story and a sinister villain. However, the film itself couldn't reel me in. I wish it did.
Page 2 of 56