Midnight's Children - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Midnight's Children Reviews

Page 1 of 3
August 17, 2017
The general consensus was, while it was beautifully shot, it lacked heart.
May 9, 2013
Faithfully adapted from Salman Rushdie's award-winning 1981 novel, the movie feels both too packed and too slight, overflowing with vivid details but lacking the structure to support their weight.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
December 26, 2012
Lacks soul, imagination and even basic logic.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
December 18, 2012
Mehta fudges the political allegory in favour of the story's magical realism, but still can't get her arms around the material - or past Rushdie's own bear-hug.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
April 23, 2013
So lavish and unwieldy is the book, Rushdie's best, that a film of it can't help but feel like a helpless reduction, like a bucket of water passed off as an ocean.
October 19, 2012
Rather more virtuosity behind the camera was required to induce the desired hypnotic effect. Deepa Mehta just isn't up to it.
October 16, 2012
A ghastly, shockingly inept piece of filmmaking.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/5
April 23, 2013
Midnight's Children has the paradoxical misfortune of being both too rushed and too wearingly long.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
December 27, 2012
There is not enough space here to detail the plot, which is basically about two boys whose paths are swapped on the evening of India's independence.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
April 21, 2013
Preserves much of the novel's intricacy and human drama, perhaps due to Salman Rushdie's involvement as co-screenwriter, even if it remains singularly unremarkable from a cinematic perspective.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
December 31, 2012
Considering Midnight's Children is bound up in notions of identity, it is faintly disastrous that this adaptation should be so lacking in one of its own.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
September 9, 2012
Director Deepa Mehta slathers proceedings in a haze of period whimsy - sometimes engaging, sometimes less so.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
May 15, 2013
Teeming with personality and digestible flights of fancy, only to be crushed by the overall narrative responsibility, unable to juggle faces and places to satisfaction.
Full Review | Original Score: C
November 22, 2012
A series of pretty, disconnected scenes. At worst, it becomes D-movie Dickens, devolving into semi-broad, semi-quirky comedy, poorly sketched-out coincidence, and a bad X-Men plot. The book is drained of its allusive, allegorical and dramatic force.
May 9, 2013
The film is beautifully shot, with vivid production design. But because of the tale's lack of cohesion, it doesn't carry enough emotional heft.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
December 20, 2012
Everything here needed enriching, amping up, amplifying out. Less isn't always more; sometimes more is more.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
April 25, 2013
A movie that, if never exactly dull, feels drained of the mythic juice that powers the book, which won the Booker Prize in 1981.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
November 2, 2012
[I]t's almost never a good idea to let novelists adapt their own fiction for the screen. A cold distant appraisal of what works onscreen and what doesn't is required, and it's not fair to expect writers to be so brutal with their babies.
May 2, 2013
Mehta has given us something as pale as it is panoramic.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
April 28, 2015
There's nothing to hang onto here. Most scenes last only two or three minutes, and events don't accrue so much as they just pig-pile on top of one another.
Page 1 of 3