Multiplicity - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Multiplicity Reviews

Page 1 of 3
July 29, 2002
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
January 1, 2000
Groundhog Day had a certain sweetness and even a sly philosophical depth, but Multiplicity is more of a ground-level comedy, in which we can usually anticipate the problems for Doug and his clones.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
February 2, 2004
| Original Score: 2/5
February 24, 2003
Michael Keaton is very funny, but the comedy itself isn't worth his efforts.
| Original Score: 2/5
January 1, 2000
Ends up falling a bit flat on the screen.
| Original Score: 3/5
January 1, 2000
Multiplicity ignores just about every question that would naturally come to the movie-goer's mind.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
January 1, 2000
Multiplicity cheats itself by not letting its imagination run as wild as its star.
Read More | Original Score: 2.5/4
January 1, 2000
Director Harold Ramis had more serious ambitions. Multiplicity should have been another Groundhog Day, which Ramis also directed, but he comes up short.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
September 7, 2011
Full Review | Original Score: C+
June 24, 2003
Full Review| Original Score: 2/10
October 9, 2005
A desperately unfunny comedy lethargically directed by Harold Ramis, and boringly acted by Michael Keaton.
| Original Score: 1/5
October 5, 2003
| Original Score: 1/5
April 4, 2003
More is not better, in this case.
| Original Score: 1/5
January 1, 2000
Starts out with a great premise, but fails to deliver on its promise.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
July 11, 2001
It could have been a good story, but it turns out to be thin, despite good acting performances by Keaton and MacDowell.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
January 1, 2000
Multiplicity exists because it's now possible for an actor to appear on screen with himself and not by means of anything so quaint as double exposure.
January 1, 2000
Keaton does a dandy job by his four Dougs, but the problem is a script that assumes a physical comedian can do it all, including twisting characters to make them fit the plot line. It doesn't work.
January 1, 2000
Ramis and his quartet of writers, including City Slickers shtick factories of Lowell Ganz & Babaloo Mandel, can't find much to do with their simple premise.
January 1, 2000
I recommend this to anyone who wants to see a solipsistic comedy about the darker side of marriage.
January 1, 2000
The comedy itself, however, is uneven and, more often than not, obvious.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
Page 1 of 3