Never Let Me Go - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Never Let Me Go Reviews

Page 1 of 174
½ June 17, 2018
its not a movie with the predictable happy ending. Not at all. But its delicate, emotive, and beautifully directed showcasing the talents of today's best BYA (British Young Artists) -Mulligan, as always, carries so much emotion even when she doesn't speak. Keira Knightly plays against that quietness and Garfield delivers the most memorable performance of his career to date. Loved it.
May 11, 2018
Although 'Never let me go' fails to champion the rich, tragic notes of the novel, it has a tender beauty about it that will stay with you long after the film is over..
½ March 22, 2018
Too flat for a story so depressing. It fails to live up to its potential and it's a pity.
March 17, 2018
i thought this was a pretty good movie
March 6, 2018
The pacing and understandings are frustrating, even if the film means well.
½ March 4, 2018
Depressing (I didn't laugh once) but beautiful (in a heartbreaking way). The story, the soundtrack, and the photography were pieced carefully together to create a film full of emotion (again, depressing emotions but still) and profound thought.
½ January 30, 2018
It really got to me. It's a fascinating story, full of sadness, melancholy and love. I didn't read the book, but even so I can tell I would have liked it even more. The story is what makes the movie good in the first place.
January 18, 2018
Whereas the novel draws out the claustrophobic mystery of this world's dystopic vision until the very end, the film keeps things explicit and straightforward, undercutting the dread necessary to make the relationships real and rewarding.
½ January 13, 2018
Bad decent mediocre sci-fi movie.
December 7, 2017
It's a movie with a heavy sad subject. It is not always capable of let the viewer feel the sadness of the theme.
Even if I saw it last week, i can't quite remember everything except for some scenes, richer than others on the emotional side.
The subject was a good base concept,but they couldn't achieve the profoundness in order to touch the audience.
½ November 14, 2017
3.5 out of 5 tear drops. The film is sad and gloomy throughout with small blips of happiness.
The colour pallet and score reflect strongly on the damp and bleek world Mulligan has to wade through.
A subtle social commentary on the morality in the division of social status. This thought or idea is hauntingly relevant in our world that is losing its middle class.
Take a look if you're in the mood to feel down.
September 20, 2017
This movie is almost great... the cast are fantastic, the director has shot it perfectly. The movie just doesn't get to the emotional intensity that the story desereves. A shame. But I must read the book.
June 13, 2017
With an odd premise, but a rather effective execution in style, performances and direction, this flick combines two genres most audiences may find inadequate, or even strange, but with enough charisma and touching atmosphere, this unconventional love story works with plenty of material and substance, even if its message isn't quite as clear for the average viewer in the end.
½ April 13, 2017
A depressing and slow take on a somewhat depressing and slow novel. This film takes a novel with deep and complex relationships and transforms it into a dry, cliché film centered around an overplayed love triangle. Kazuo Ishiguro's novel highlights the strenuous relationship between the characters Kathy and Ruth, two clones destined for a short and restricted life. This film takes the centerpiece of the book and buries it along with all the other intriguing characters Kathy encounters along her journey. Ishiguro carefully crafted this dystopia and gave us detailed, meaningful looks into the education system the students at Hailsham experienced. Hailsham remains an important set piece within the film but in the film's attempt to construct a romance, the significance of Hailsham is lost. The fruit borne by the increased focus on Tommy and Kathy's relationship is a closer look at the post Hailsham lifestyle for the clones. The merit of this film lies in visuals provided. The scenes in the film aren't particularly compelling but they do provide much needed clarity that the novel lacks. Descriptions of characters and locations are quite underwhelming in the novel. This film does a decent job of presenting Ishiguro's story in a digestible manner. The acting in this film is tired and uninteresting. Awkward silences are hammered in between lines in an attempt to add depth and intensity. The strong characters Ishiguro envisioned are replaced by actors that would be better suited starring in a zombie film. This movie took a book with an interesting concept and produced a cinematic blunder that pandered to an audience far above its weight class.
April 11, 2017
Dull and lifeless, this poor excuse of a cinematic interpretation of Never Let Me Go lacks details that are crucial to the main purpose of the novel. It is undeniable that the bare skeleton is present; the timeline of Hailsham, The Cottages, and finally the donations are certainly accurate. To fully understand the intricate relationships between Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy, Hailsham needs to be more prevalent. The director-Mark Romanek-glosses over the genesis of the protagonists. At Hailsham, readers observe how Ruth goes out of her way to move into favor with The Guardians, which emphasizes her thirst for attention and social status (which was a differentiating factor in a place where individuality was sparse). Interactions with the Guardians also shed light on Kathy, as well. Even though Ruth excludes Kathy from her secret protection group, Kathy still allows her to walk next to the guardians, which demonstrates her a priori carer instinct. On that subject, the chess incident was omitted in its entirety. When Ruth is backed into a corner (by her own doing), she becomes rather defensive and goes out of her way to exclude Kathy. If these scenes were even slightly brushed over in the beginning of the movie, the true meaning of the interactions between Kathy and Ruth would be clear. Rather than petty feelings over "the boy", the audience would be able to extrapolate that Ruth is an abrasive and manipulative person, and Kathy is more innocent and sentimental. If Hailsham was a more prevalent part of this film, Never Let Me Go would be portrayed as a more intellectual and riveting piece, rather than a childish chick-flick.
½ April 10, 2017
Never Let Me Go is one of the most interesting adaptations of a book to a film I have seen in my life. It includes a great deal more detail into the relationships between characters than the book was able to get by, but far less detail surrounding the exact events of the story. The book gave a more silent, yet objective view of the world, as the story follows multiple characters at once, and allows the viewer to make up their own mind about each character and scenario. It's interesting to see the story not only from Kathy H.'s or another clone's viewpoint, but also to give a perspective of a normal human, looking in. The scene where Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy are looking to who they believe in the model of Ruth, we can clearly see the surprise and feeling of uncomfortableness on the woman's face as she sees people just staring at her. While in the text they do not share such raw emotion of the character, but rather Kathy H.'s perspective of the emotion of a character. It is refreshing to see an unfiltered outlook on the story. There is also the bold choice to reveal the purpose of Hailsham earlier than in the book, but it chooses to ignore the more radical effects of Hailsham until further into the film. It's a good way of giving credit and a little bit of a nod towards people who read the book, as the film hints at many themes that were explored in the text, but lacking in the film. The film falls through compared to the book in a few ways, the major being cut content. The Hailsham scenes felt rushed, and the filmed dwelled too much on the Cabin scenes. It was a great deal of detail put into the donations scenes that really amplifies the horror of the scenario, which I personally felt was lacking in the book, but adapted really well into the film. The music score was average at best, with some really well made pieces that fit the feeling of the scene, and some horrible choices that drew me out of the story and set. The lines were done very well, and characters look the way they should, and overall it was an above average film, but very well done for a movie adaptation of a book. Although, like most films in this vein, I feel that the film is best appreciated after reading the text.
½ April 2, 2017
Wants to be deep and meaningful, sad and aching but i just found it empty and sterile.
February 3, 2017
I love this movie because it is sincere, moving and haunting in its quiet, thought-provoking beauty.
January 29, 2017
Nicely shot and well acted, but with a nonsensical plot that leaves too many questions unanswered, the main one being, why do they submit to this arrangement?
Page 1 of 174