Permanent Midnight - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Permanent Midnight Reviews

Page 3 of 10
½ August 18, 2010
ben stiller plays a pretty good dope fiend
½ August 18, 2010
We've seen this story all before, and in far more graphic detail. Permanent Midnight is PG-13 compared to most heroin-user biopics. But, Stiller taps into his inner-darker self and breathes life into the character, making for a somewhat enjoyable ride. Writter Jerry Stahl's story is far more different than the average drug addict - he was successful, and threw it away with this habbit.

Stiller really transformed into a dark actor with some range in his role as Stahl. And Stiller's effort was needed because the story pretty much centers around him with barely any supporting help. The role to say the least, was very demanding and Stiller did a good job.

The real problem with Permanent Midnight - honestly who is Jerry Stahl? Why should we care about him? And what makes his story any different to any other heroin addict who threw their lives away? The only thing interesting about him is the fact that he injected himself daily with heroin, yet he preached eating healthy and he ran a messily 5 miles a day!

Some of Stahl's writing was very good, with the ever powerful quote "Some stories you remember for the rest of your life, some stories you spend your life trying to forget". But, I feel like Stahl didn't know whether he wanted his biopic to be funny or serious and it falls in the cracks somewhere in between.

Despite a surprisingly solid performance by Stiller, Permanent Midnight really brings nothing special to it's genre. And it never helps when your director (David Veloz) is helming his first ever film.
Maybe if Stahl let someone else re-write his story it would have been better. Perhaps someone who still does drugs?
July 23, 2010
?Some stories you remember for the rest of your life, some stories you spend your life trying to forget.? ? Jerry Stahl

After publishing several stark short stories, real life writer Jerry Stahl (Ben Stiller) moves to Los Angeles where he lands a job as a teleplay writer earning $5000 per week. Jerry also has a heroin habit that grows up to $6000 per week. The film details his struggle with addiction. The story is told in flashbacks through a one night stand between Jerry and a woman named Kitty (Maria Bello). The film is based on the autobiography of the same name by Stahl, who has since become an accomplished novelist in his own right.

Jerry and Kitty meet at a drive-thru window where Jerry works. She instantly recognizes him as a recovering addict (she is also one) and asks him to get a cup of coffee. Jerry splits work and the two go to a hotel room. After some bad sex they pass the night by Jerry telling his story of addiction. The encounter of these two and the presence of the Kitty character is merely just a convenience for the telling of the primary story, which is much more interesting. The current-tense scenes become an inconvenient necessity.

Jerry?s only connection in LA is an old high school friend, Nicky (Owen Wilson). Jerry lives on Nicky?s couch stealing his illegal prescriptions and taking whatever drugs he can get a hold of. Nicky introduces Jerry to Sandra (Elizabeth Hurley), a British citizen who needs a green card to stay in the country. Jerry agrees to marry her for $30, 000 after one meeting. Sandra works in the television industry, and after reading Jerry?s writing she sets him up with a job writing for a TV show titled ?Mr. Chompers,? a parody of Alf. Jerry actually worked on Alf, but the title and characters weren?t permitted for use in the film. Jerry seems to be a terrible fit for the trashy sitcom, and when he goes into the meeting with the shows developer (Fred Willard), they could not be on more opposite planes. Jerry gets the job anyway; he writes his first script based on his father?s terribly boisterous funeral following his suicide. With grimace, he purges this emotionally distressing event and transforms it into cheap comedy. During the same scene there is a well staged bit where Jerry?s mom calls. Jerry is the only one seen and heard but we know from his dialogue that she is heavily intoxicated. She has misdialed and has no idea who she is talking too. It clearly is not the first time and Jerry hangs up on her. This is the only insight we get into his drug seeking behaviour.

Jerry never shows any external frustration from his troubles, he completely internalizes, and it becomes self-hatred. It really is a phenomenal performance by Stiller. The film is worth seeing for him alone. The scene when Jerry first starts using heroin takes place when he picks up a neo-Nazi (Connie Nielson) from a bar and they use together at her place. She knows he is Jewish and has sex with him for degradation. She is a mirror of self-hatred for Jerry and he becomes a regular user after their encounter, and subsequently addicted. After some searching around he finds a regular dealer outside a methadone clinic, where he tries to get help. Jerry manages to hold down his day job writing for ?Mr. Chompers? even though he is clearly an addict. Although eventually enough is enough for his boss and he is fired. Despite his ever growing problems with drugs Sandra falls in love with him and they have a daughter together, unplanned. She sticks by him while he self-destructs, not knowing how to handle him.

The story of addiction is nothing new to books or film. I have not read Stahl?s autobiography so I do not know how the material was approached in the novel. What I really loved about the film was David Veloz?s approach to the adaptation; not to mention Stiller?s performance. The focus is primarily on Jerry using drugs and seeking drugs. All other events in Jerry?s life just become irrelevant pieces of information that fall by the wayside. The junky?s only goal is to get high by any means necessary and the film portrays Jerry?s life exactly that way; as it was. It is only the scenes before and after his addiction, when he is sober that are translucent. That is what makes Permanent Midnight a great film, the way in which the addiction is depicted. Otherwise, without a doubt this would be the standard (perhaps cautionary for some) tale of addiction, and the struggle for redemption.
May 11, 2010
a story about real-life screenwriter and his struggles with substance abuse and how he lost everything. not a remarkably original premise but kind of interesting to see the underbelly of hollywood. stiller gives a good, if unusual, performance - i don't think he's played a drug addict before or since. however the overall feel of the movie seems tainted by the heroin "mystique" that so many movies of the 90s pay homage to.

the mystique of heroin in and of itself is not enough to carry a movie really and that's what hurts the film in my eyes - it relies too much on that "coolness" heroin (which i've never bought into); it also seems to follow that that pattern that became cliche in the 90s: celebrities who have it all then get hooked on drugs and then get clean and then come the media interviews talking about how terrible it was for them, and how high they were one time when... blah blah blah. i've never had much sympathy for those celebrity types...
½ March 21, 2010
I went into this with very low expectations and was pleasantly surprised. It's not wonderful, the central character's car crash actions get a but tiresome sometimes, but it's well made.
½ February 2, 2010
L'histoire vraie (?) de Jerry Stahl, scenariste de television et junkie, sa descente aux enfers et sa remission, avec un Ben Stiller sombre, plus proche de ses premieres realisations que de ses comedies pouet-pouet.

Un sujet vu des centaines de fois, mais ici avec une certaine emotion.

Sympatoche.
½ December 15, 2009
Ben Stiller interpreta el papel de su vida encarnando a Jerry Stahl, el escritor de comedias para la television como "Alf", "Thirty-Something" y "Moonlightning", quien cae en el abismo de la adiccion. En la linea de "Less Than Zero" y "Bright Lights, Big City", Stiller supera a Robert Downey Jr. y a MIchael J. Fox, en hacernos sentir la personalidad autodestructiva y obsesiva del adicto. Dificil de ver pero imposible de perder.
October 26, 2009
One of my favorite movies of all time. Realized Ben Stiller was a real actor!
½ October 18, 2009
The best movie ever to feature Ben Stiller and Owen Wilson. If you haven't seen this movie check it out.
September 24, 2009
Look at the cast, then look at the synopsis.
August 23, 2009
A dark and depressing look at a writer's descent into heroin addiction and the eventual ruin of his life, told from a motel after going through rehab. Ben Stiller is frighteningly convincing as Jerry Stahl while Elizabeth Hurley is brilliant as his hollywood wife.
June 30, 2009
i have seen this and living that life was not fun and ben stiller did a great job hitting some serious points in this film.
April 12, 2009
Not your typical Stiller film. This goes to show that he has some unused talent amongst the 'Duplex' and 'Along Came Polly'-esque garbage that he usually spills out.
½ March 22, 2009
his is a great movie; Ben Stiller is fabulous in it--it really shows how talented and "under-used" he is.
March 19, 2009
Good movie but had potential to be greater. There were some decent scenes. I especially liked his drugged out interview. It's hard to watch this movie and try to think of Ben Stiller in a more "serious" role since we're so used to his slapstick comedies.
March 14, 2009
i didnt know that jerry springer was a suppository addict. maybe its just a theme in the movie. Frankly this movie is about as appealing as going to the zoo and watching the jizz monkeys periodically scatter the gathered crowd.
½ January 30, 2009
a must see movie. ben stiller is a serious actor in this. great movie about drug addiction.
½ December 29, 2008
california junkies do cocaine and drink vegetable smothies
December 10, 2008
no thanks not my kinda thing
Page 3 of 10