The Resurrected - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

The Resurrected Reviews

Page 1 of 4
½ December 27, 2017
Pretty great lost little Lovecraft adaptation. I think it's the closest to the source material I've seen. It's a strange, morbid little film noir.
½ September 29, 2017
Great effects, awful movie
June 3, 2017
Dan O'Bannon's 'lost' film. Based on HP Lovecraft's 'Charles Dexter Ward'. O'Bannon's version of this film was overhauled by the studio while he was dealing with a devastating illness. The results were mixed, and the film went straight to home video. The optical effex are laughable, the same way Hellraiser's are. But the practical effects are an A+, with some of the scariest creatures I've seen in any film! Also called 'Shatterbrain'. RIP Dan.

Just fyi, Scream Factory is releasing The Resurrected on Region A blu-ray on Sept. 12, 2017. There is a German region B blu-ray release already available.
October 30, 2015
An excellent HP Lovecraft film, much overlooked
½ May 19, 2014
Old School horror thriller, the kind they simply don't make anymore
June 13, 2013
Takes too long to get to its climax and not very satisfying when it does.
½ April 25, 2013
Really good. Terrific job by Chris Sarandon. The best I've ever seen him.
April 19, 2013
As far as an H.P Lovecraft adaption its meh but if you're a fan of Chris Sarandon chewing up scenery than your'e in luck because this is loaded with it.
½ November 13, 2012
78%

Holy resurrected 80's rubber monster madness!
September 18, 2012
A pleasant dose of Lovecraftian horror, touting a captivating occult atmosphere and top-knotch prosthetics... making for some memorably faithful grotesqueries and Dunwich-wont abominations. Highly recommended for fans of Lovecraftian cinema.
½ September 10, 2012
This movie is based on the Lovecraft story The Case of Charles Dexter Ward. This movie is very close to the original story and is a good thriller.
½ February 15, 2012
The Resurrected (Dan O'Bannon, 1992)

The great screenwriter Dan O'Bannon made an indelible mark in Hollywood with his first two scripts, a couple of science-fiction tales that twisted genre conventions called Dark Star (made into a cult-classic 1974 movie by a then-unknown director named John Capenter) and Alien (made into a classic 1979 film by then-obscure TV episode director Ridley Scott). While O'Bannon would pursue science fiction his entire working career as a writer, penning such gems as Total Recall and Invaders from Mars, when he took to the director's chair, he went with the other genre he'd worked in: horror. O'Bannon was also responsible for the script for the excellent, overlooked 1981 Gary Sherman film Dead and Buried, so he obviously had horror chops. Then, in 1984, he got his first chance to direct, and he jumped at it. The result was 1985's The Return of the Living Dead, to this day the best zombedy of all time and, to my mind, one of the best movies in any genre. (On my list of the thousand best movies ever made, The Return of the Living Dead sits at #8.) For some reason, O'Bannon would wait another seven years to direct again, and when he did, he found himself guilty of the same hubris so many horror directors fall prey to: first off, he attempted to adapt an H. P. Lovecraft story ("The Case of Charles Dexter Ward") to the screen, something that has been tried many times and usually failed. Second, and more odd for a veteran screenwriter: he went off someone else's script to do it.

The Resurrected (since re-released under the even more ludicrous title Shatterbrain) tells us the story of one Charles Dexter Ward (Fright Night's Chris Sarandon), a nice, average guy from New England who happens to own a second house out in the middle of nowhere. As the time he spends up there increases, his wife Claire (Jane Sibbett, who should be, but probably isn't, best remembered as the female lead on the highly underrated TV series Herman's Head) hires a private investigator (Full Metal Jacket's John Terry) to find out what he's up to. The two of them discover a diary from the eighteenth century kept by one of Ward's ancestors, and begin to fear that Ward is duplicating the experiments of Joseph Curwen (also played by Sarandon, which should give you a clue).

It's not a bad little film, and aside from updating the setting to the 1990s, it's surprisingly faithful to the source material. And yet, O'Bannon never quite seems to inhabit the material the way he did with The Return of the Living Dead, a screenplay he wrote. This one was turned in by Brent V. Friedman, who in the twenty years since the release of this movie has become a very respected writer of TV science fiction (Dark Skies, the recent Twilight Zone reboot, The Clone Wars), but who in 1992 was a relatively-untested commodity, best known for Hollywood Hot Tubs 2: Educating Crystal. Not really the guy to be developing a Lovecraft script, and it shows. But compared to most of the direct-to-DVD nonsense out there, the flaws in it are minor, and have to do with pacing and characterization (on the script side) and lighting and set design (on the tech side) rather than major problems that turn this into a showstopper.

It's not The Return of the Living Dead, but then, few things are. Probably best sought out these days by O'Bannon completists or fans of the principals, but Lovecraft purists take note: this is, comparatively, a pretty good adaptation. ** 1/2
December 6, 2011
As far as an H.P Lovecraft adaption its meh but if you're a fan of Chris Sarandon chewing up scenery than your'e in luck because this is loaded with it.
October 11, 2011
I fought the urge to sleep through this over dramatic waste of film.
July 18, 2011
I fought the urge to sleep through this over dramatic waste of film.
July 9, 2011
(***): Thumbs Up

I had fun with this one. It had some creepy moments that really kept me interested.
½ April 18, 2011
Creepy in parts. Not a great movie but some interesting scenes. Based on a Lovecraft story.
½ February 27, 2011
Not a Chris Sarandon fan, but he really surprised me here. I had very low expectations but found myself pleasantly entertained.
February 18, 2011
Decent Lovecraft Adaptation...
February 14, 2011
This wasn't a great movie, in fact at times it's pretty bad. However, it gets so gosh-darn crazy towards the end that it retained my interest all the way through. It's also based on a Lovecraft story, and manages to retain the feel of his writing, to the film's benefit (creepy, mysterious tone) and its detriment (a lot of flashbacks and second-hand accounts).
Page 1 of 4