Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves Reviews

Page 3 of 3
April 4, 2003
March 24, 2003
March 19, 2003
Laughably bad. No threat to Errol Flynn.
February 21, 2003
February 13, 2003
February 11, 2003
July 26, 2002
January 1, 2000
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves has pomp and scale; what it lacks is something essential -- a sense of "Once Upon a Time" wonder, the exultant, heady thrill of legend.
January 1, 2000
On the whole, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is a lot of fun and will doubtless clean up at the box office the first couple of weeks.
January 1, 2000
This is the kind of scriptwriting where whenever someone falls there is always a fortuitous haystack to break the fall. When swords strike each other or a wall there are always sparks.
January 1, 2000
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is a murky, unfocused, violent and depressing version of the classic story, with little of the lightheartedness and romance we expect from Robin Hood.
January 1, 2000
The only redistribution of wealth engaged in by this Robin Hood occurs at the box office when you hand over your money for admission. What a large scale mess this is.
January 1, 2000
A famous story made Hollywood compliant
January 1, 2000
Fair damsels and noble sirs, you must free yourselves of these wearisome observations. This is a state-of-the-art retelling of a classic.
Page 3 of 3