RoboCop 3 - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

RoboCop 3 Reviews

Page 1 of 2
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
January 1, 2000
Why do they persist in making these retreads? Because RoboCop is a brand name, I guess, and this is this year's new model. It's an old tradition in Detroit to take an old design and slap on some fresh chrome.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Top Critic
James Berardinelli
January 1, 2000
This installment goes for straight action, allowing only brief instances of the facetiousness which made the original so enjoyable.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Scott Weinberg
July 25, 2002
| Original Score: 1/5
Clint Morris
Film Threat
May 6, 2005
| Original Score: 2/5
Tim Brayton
Antagony & Ecstasy
February 18, 2014
Worse than anything to do with the plot, is the saggy action, which has that unpleasant peek-a-boo quality of hard violence retrofitted into teen-friendly fare.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/10
Jeffrey M. Anderson
Combustible Celluloid
September 1, 2007
The series had run its course.
Felix Vasquez Jr.
Cinema Crazed
August 19, 2013
A tame and brutally boring final installment...
Top Critic
Wally Hammond
Time Out
February 9, 2006
Dekker's third instalment also comes third in terms of merit.
John J. Puccio
Movie Metropolis
May 23, 2004
All of the humanity of the first movie and what little there was in the second movie are drained from RoboCop 3.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/10
Top Critic
Desson Thomson
Washington Post
January 1, 2000
If you really want more RoboCop, rent the video of the first movie.
Top Critic
Stephen Holden
New York Times
August 30, 2004
In the latest episode of the series, which seems to have nearly run out of steam, he is portrayed by Robert John Burke, an actor who bears some resemblance to Mr. Weller while lacking his forerunner's tongue-in-cheek glint of authoritarian machismo.
| Original Score: 1/5
James O'Ehley
Sci-Fi Movie Page
January 1, 2000
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
Top Critic
Brian Lowry
March 26, 2009
Limiting the gore, but not the carnage, in pursuit of a PG-13 rating and more youngsters, pic remains a cluttered, nasty exercise that seems principally intent on selling action figures.
Daniel M. Kimmel
Worcester Telegram & Gazette
July 8, 2004
| Original Score: 1/5
Shellie Iliff
Palo Alto Weekly
May 20, 2003
| Original Score: 1/4
January 1, 2000
No, it's not a good movie. In fact, it's really quite awful, to be honest.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
Brian Mckay
March 21, 2003
Hard to believe that Frank Miller, who's written some great graphic novels, also churned out this dismal script. The absence of Weller doesn't help matters.
| Original Score: 2/5
Ryan Cracknell
Movie Views
December 4, 2003
| Original Score: 1/5
Nicolas Lacroix
May 25, 2004
| Original Score: 1/5
Spence D.
IGN Movies
February 10, 2004
| Original Score: 2/5
Page 1 of 2