South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut Reviews

Page 1 of 5
April 9, 2005
It fails miserably.
Full Review | Original Score: D+
January 1, 2000
A few good jokes for every dozen groaners!
July 9, 2004
Like listening to a profane rant by kids stricken with Tourette's syndrome.
January 1, 2000
The profanity for profanity's sake approach shows a lack of imagination when many in the past have used similar vulgarities with far more amusing and creatively pleasant results.
May 20, 2003
Vulgar and tasteless as usual, but most definitely longer and, quite obviously, to its detriment, uncut.
| Original Score: 2.5/4
January 1, 2000
A quarter of an hour would have been plenty of time with these tart-tongued tiny tots.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
January 1, 2001
There are some good visuals and a fairly good storyline, but all of these qualities are very uneven. Nothing, except high energy and edginess, are maintained very long.
Full Review | Original Score: C+
February 27, 2001
The satirical message is that the moral defenders of impressionable American youth would literally rather see violent death than obscenity, but Parker and Stone end up delivering both in overabundant quantities to prove their point.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
January 1, 2000
You can't shake the feeling that 60 minutes of comedy has been stretched and teased and goosed to make 80 minutes of movie.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
January 1, 2000
80 minutes of this boring animated comedy/musical feels so long that it will seriously test any moviegoer's patience!
January 1, 2000
It is abundantly clear that Parker and Stone desperately want to be, or at least appear to be, subversive, but for the most part, this is kiddie subversion.
January 1, 2000
Hollywood can't get much raunchier than this, can it? If there's a buck to be made, it will.
Full Review | Original Score: C-
January 1, 2000
South Park is profoundly stupid, but given the times it has guts.
January 1, 2000
Naughty words and images pile up like bodies in a Schwarzenegger movie until viewers are numbed by it all. And that's within the first half-hour.
January 1, 2000
The quite clever satirical moments in this crudely animated filth fest, though, are not remotely worth being dragged through the cinematic sewer.
January 1, 2000
Irreverent, gross and childish!
August 7, 2008
Nastier than it is subversive or funny.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
February 9, 2006
Genuinely outrageous and sometimes hilarious -- but size does eventually matter, and all-rounder Trey Parker just can't keep it up for the full 81 minutes.
January 1, 2000
The year's most slashing political commentary is not in the new films by Oliver Stone, David Lynch or John Sayles, but in an animated comedy about obscenity.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
January 1, 2000
While there aren't more than a handful of gut-busting, laugh-aloud moments, there is enough sly, slick humor to keep the average viewer chuckling throughout.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Page 1 of 5