Spy Kids 3-D - Game Over - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Spy Kids 3-D - Game Over Reviews

Page 1 of 7
Philip Kerr
New Statesman
July 29, 2015
The 3D stuff works really well.
R. L. Shaffer
January 29, 2012
Spy Kids 3 is much sharper and funnier than the second outing, but the missing pieces, namely the parents and sister, are sorely needed.
Full Review | Original Score: 7/10
Nell Minow
Common Sense Media
December 28, 2010
Kids will love it, but adults may find it flat.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Felix Vasquez Jr.
Cinema Crazed
April 29, 2009
Rodriguez knows how to evoke the imagination in children with such an enjoyable family yarn.
Andrew Wright
Portland Mercury
January 21, 2005
Retains the homemade virtues that made the earlier installments such an un-selfconscious, pleasingly clunky delight.
John J. Puccio
Movie Metropolis
February 19, 2004
...watching in 3-D is annoying and watching in 2-D is pointless. Kind of a losing situation.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/10
Thomas Delapa
Boulder Weekly
February 9, 2004
A loser in any dimension....As if one Stallone wasn't bad enough, Rodriguez gives us three of them.
Daniel M. Kimmel
Worcester Telegram & Gazette
January 2, 2004
Where Rodriguez falls short... is in relying on the computer generated special effects to make up for problems in the script.
Full ReviewRead More | Original Score: 2/5
Todd Lothery
News & Observer (Raleigh, NC)
November 20, 2003
That's just what it feels like -- a video game, not a movie, and a noisy, frenetic game at that.
Mark Palermo
The Coast (Halifax, Nova Scotia)
September 20, 2003
Robert Rodriguez continues to pillage from past adventure genres, but the experience is about the boundless creativity of kids' dreams, not retro nostalgia.
Full ReviewRead More
Rich Cline
Shadows on the Wall
September 12, 2003
While the film as a whole is still good fun, it lacks the freewheeling glee of the first two.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
Kevin A. Ranson
September 8, 2003
If the old red and blue 3-D glasses make your eyes hurt, you may have to skip this one, but that's the only bad thing you can say about it.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Steve Persall
Tampa Bay Times
August 28, 2003
A movie so awful that those headaches spurred by the film's shoddy optics effects seem minor by comparison.
Full Review | Original Score: F
August 24, 2003
The 3-D is crap. And Rodriguez should have had more sense than to make Juni the star of the show.
| Original Score: 1.5/4
Michael Dequina
August 20, 2003
Even without the 3-D, set pieces such as a high-octane race and a faceoff between two giant robots would be surefire adrenaline rushes.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Collin Souter
August 17, 2003
Don't go unless you're in a good mood and you want to re-live a silly movie technique from your childhood. In the right frame of mind, this movie can be a blast.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Harry Guerin
RTÉ (Ireland)
August 14, 2003
With 3D glasses on or off, it doesn't measure up to its predecessors.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
August 8, 2003
I was too bored to be properly angry, and too disgusted to be properly lulled to sleep. Robert has betrayed us all.
Full Review| Original Score: 0/5
Blake French
August 7, 2003
It?s a blast -- fun for the whole family.
| Original Score: 3.5/5
Ryan Cracknell
Movie Views
August 7, 2003
Like any gimmick, once the initial intrigue of the 3-D has been satiated you're left looking at Game Over like you would with any other. And once you start looking at [it] like any other film you quickly realize it's boring.
Page 1 of 7