Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) - Rotten Tomatoes

Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: Visually spectacular and suitably action packed, Star Trek Into Darkness is a rock-solid installment in the venerable sci-fi franchise, even if it's not as fresh as its predecessor.

Star Trek Into Darkness Videos

Star Trek Into Darkness Photos

Movie Info

In Summer 2013, pioneering director J.J. Abrams will deliver an explosive action thriller that takes 'Star Trek Into Darkness.' When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis. With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction. As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew. (c) Paramount
Rating:
PG-13 (for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence)
Genre:
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Directed By:
Written By:
In Theaters:
 wide
On DVD:
Box Office:
$228,756,232.00
Runtime:
Studio:

Watch it now

Cast

Chris Pine
as James T. Kirk
Zoe Saldana
as Uhura
Karl Urban
as Leonard ''Bones'' McCoy
Simon Pegg
as Scotty
John Cho
as Sulu
Anton Yelchin
as Pavel Checkov
Bruce Greenwood
as Christopher Pike
Amanda Foreman
as Ensign Brackett
Alice Eve
as Carol Marcus
Benedict Cumberbatch
as John Harrison
Leonard Nimoy
as Spock Prime
Peter Weller
as Marcus
Noel Clarke
as Thomas Harewood
Nazneen Contractor
as Rima Harewood
Jay Scully
as Lieutenant Chapin
Jonathan Dixon
as Ensign Froman
Aisha Hinds
as Navigation Officer Darwin
Joseph Gatt
as Science Officer 0718
Jeremy Raymond
as Lead Nibiran
Tony Guma
as Nibiran
Sean Blakemore
as Klingon
Beau Billingslea
as Captain Abbot
Deep Roy
as Keenser
Anjini Azhar
as Lucille Harewood
Jack Laufer
as Doctor
Chris Hemsworth
as George Kirk
Jennifer Morrison
as Winona Kirk
Seth Ayott
as U.S.S. Enterprise Shuttle Ensign
Marco Sanchez
as Torpedo Security
Lee Reherman
as Uniformed Mercenary
Scott Lawrence
as U.S.S. Vengeance Officer
Usman Ally
as U.S.S. Vengeance Officer
Nolan North
as U.S.S. Vengeance Bridge Officer
James Hiroyuki Liao
as U.S.S. Vengeance Bridge Officer
Rob Moran
as U.S.S. Vengeance Ensign
Berit Francis
as Starfleet Admiral
Akiva Goldsman
as Starfleet Admiral
Benjamin P. Binswanger
as Starfleet Admiral
Christopher Doohan
as Transport Officer
Andy Demetrio
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew Member
Gianna Simone
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew Member
Rene Rosado
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew
Jacquelynn King
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew
Tran Duy Long
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew Member
Ningning Deng
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew Member
Jodi Johnston
as U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge Crew Member
Jeffrey Chase
as U.S.S. Enterprise Security
Monisola Akiwowo
as U.S.S. Enterprise Nurse
Paul K. Daniel
as Shuttle Pilot
Ser'Darius Blain
as U.S.S. Enterprise Red Shirt
Melissa Paulo
as Bar Girl
David Waite
as U.S.S. Enterprise Crew
Cynthia Addai-Robinson
as San Francisco Woman
Drew Grey
as San Francisco Bar Patron
Douglas Weng
as U.S.S. Vengeance Security
Charlie Haugk
as San Francisco Resident
Max Chernov
as San Francisco Resident
Marc Primiani
as San Francisco Resident
Jesper Inglis
as San Francisco Resident
Jacob Rhodes
as Nibiru Child
Kentucky Rhodes
as Nibiru Child
Eric Greitens
as Starfleet Ceremonial Guard
Melissa Steinman
as Starfleet Ceremonial Guard
Adam McCann
as Starfleet Ceremonial Guard
Jon Orvasky
as Starfleet Ceremonial Guard
Gerald W. Abrams
as Starfleet Memorial Admiral
James H. McGrath, Jr.
as Starfleet Memorial Admiral
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Star Trek Into Darkness

Critic Reviews for Star Trek Into Darkness

All Critics (265) | Top Critics (50)

Most of the logic has leached away from this movie, and with it half of the fun.

Full Review… | May 20, 2013
New Yorker
Top Critic

Happily, there's a good deal of fun if you like things crashing violently into each other and out of warp-drive at regular intervals.

Full Review… | May 18, 2013
NPR
Top Critic

For all its chasing and falling and fighting-and the movie supplies a great deal of each-Star Trek Into Darkness is at its best when the Enterprise crew are merely bickering and bantering among themselves: less space opera than soap opera.

Full Review… | May 17, 2013
The Atlantic
Top Critic

The conceptual sci-fi of the original series is nowhere to be found, though you might enjoy watching the skinny young actors approximate their counterparts from the 60s; Chris Pine is especially good as Captain Kirk.

Full Review… | May 17, 2013
Chicago Reader
Top Critic

While the action is often electric, it's the relationships that matter. That, and a lippy regard for a cultural legacy.

Full Review… | May 16, 2013
Wall Street Journal
Top Critic

The film is, for whatever else it might be, one of the funniest of the Star Trek entries.

Full Review… | May 16, 2013
Hearst Newspapers
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Star Trek Into Darkness

½

A solid alternate story that ought to give most trekkies and aficionados major goose bumps thanks to its many overwhelming and well-inspired references - which compensate for how formulaic and intensely action-oriented it aims to be above everything else.

Carlos Magalhães
Carlos Magalhães

Super Reviewer

In 2009, fans left the theatre with tears of joy streaming down their face. J.J. Abrams had rebooted the Star Trek franchise with vigour and intensity. Immediately following the release of Star Trek in 2009, it was inevitable that a sequel would be on the way, sooner than later. Although it did take over four years to finally get the release of the sequel, Star Trek Into Darkness, it is without question that it was well worth the wait. That being said, the film is not without its issues. Riddled with plot holes and poorly done callbacks, fans gained a very strong disliking to certain aspects of this sequel. Should these glaring issues still be a problem for fans today? Here is my personal breakdown of Star Trek Into Darkness. After a few trials and tribulations throughout the first act of the film, Captain Kirk is demoted once he is found doing illegal things in the organization. While Captain Pike is reinstated, Kirk eventually fill his spot once again as Captain about ten to twenty minutes later. Personally, this is where the film faced the biggest pacing issues. It almost felt like the personal drama between the new and former Captain's was there to extend the running time, because once the film kicks back into gear, it never lets up. As a threat is found in their organization, the film becomes one big man hunt to bring down the ruthless villain, played by Benedict Cumberbatch. Yes, once the film gets down to the nitty gritty, that is pretty much the basic story. Minor Spoilers Ahead: When Benedict Cumberbatch was cast as the main villain, people began to speculate, as to which character he would be playing. Kept under wraps, not mentioned in the trailers, and no slip ups in interviews, Cumberbatch's character was revealed from the start. Being the second film in the series and seeming to be paying homage to Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, fans began to think he would be playing that titular villain. Sure enough, in the second act of Star Trek Into Darkness, he reveals himself as Khan. Is this too much of a homage that it just seems like a re-imaginging of the character? That is what I believed when walking out of the theatre three years ago, but I have found a way to forgive it. It does make sense, given that Leonard Nimoy is present as an older Spock, which implies that the events of the original series may have actually happened in this timeline. Regardless, they have faced this character in the past, so it was nice to see a new spin on him. What hurts the fact that this character is included in this film, is the fact that they could not think of an original villain, as they did so well in 2009s Star Trek. Once this aspect is forgiven, you are able to immerse yourself in Cumberbatch's terrific performance and root for the Star Fleet Officers to take him down. Like the recent release of Star Wars: The Force Awakens, audiences were able to see many fresh things put into an already well-established universe of films, while simultaneously borrowing story elements of the best films from the past. One thing that bothered me about this installment of Star Trek, was the constant feel of back-tracking. Sharing scenes with the original films, almost to the point of reading lines of dialogue verbatim (although role-reversed), it became slightly annoying in the fact that they could not come up with anything clever. Although this film does stand on its own as a great film, Star Trek Into Darkness is not without these glaring issues. Overall, Star Trek Into Darkness is a very fun sequel. Although it borrows almost too many plot devices from the past, it is able to invent a few new ones along the way, making for a pure adrenaline blast on the big screen. With terrific performances all around (which is needed in a Star Trek film), there is not much to dislike here, unless you choose to nitpick flaws. I presume you will then find yourself hating this film. Filled with energy, fast-paced action sequences, clever dialogue, great character developing scenes, and a climax that I thought was spectacularly fun, this is a series that keeps on chugging along. I can't wait for this franchise to continue. I love this new cast.

KJ Proulx
KJ Proulx

Super Reviewer

½

The rebooted crew are back and this time they're going into darkness? trekking into darkness? how does this title fit the story? moving on. The first film in this new era reboot was a huge success and rightly so, it was an exciting sci-fi romp, does this remake/re-imagining of 'The Wrath of Khan' work just as well? We kick off admittedly with a very nice looking yet clear [i]Indy[/i] rip, all that was missing was a giant rolling boulder. Instantly you can see this film is gonna be a treat visually, modern films have gotten to a point now where they do (can) look extremely polished and slick, and this film is easily top of its game in the effects department, its beautiful. I do especially love futuristic London and the look of future Earth in general, so much detail, so much going on, the newer Star Wars trilogy pales in comparison. I could of course mention the immense use of lens flare but I think everyone knows that now and it merely blends into the background, some looking very nice. Lets get down n dirty here, the plot, the main issue of the film is the badly written, disjointed, confusing plot which makes no sense. I'm still not sure what exactly was the point of half of it. Marcus finds Khan and his crew floating around in space I believe, but where exactly? why was Khan in suspended animation in the first place? whose ship was he on? etc...nothing given away there. Now I think about it once Khan was discovered how did anyone know he and his mates were genetically-engineered superhumans? and why awake just one? Anyhow Marcus wants Khan to develop advanced technology and weapons...but the guy is 300 years old, surely he's gonna be slightly out of touch with modern day tech? right?? guess not. My point is does this new movie follow on from the original Star Trek episode 'Space Seed' as did 'Wrath of Khan'? Did that happen in this rebooted alternate timeline? if so then fine, most of my questions are answered. If not then there are some mighty plot holes here...or we would need to see that alternate version of 'Space Seed'. There doesn't appear to be any real goals or reasons for anyone in this film, Marcus wants Khan to create new advanced gear and then...? start a war with the Klingon's, why? He intends to start this war by getting Kirk to fight missiles at Khan who is hiding in an uninhabited area of the Klingon homeworld, but how did he know Khan would hide there? what if he hid on another world? Why exactly are Khan's crew stuffed in these missiles?? risky place to smuggle them isn't it?...well isn't it?! And no one suspects the fact there are 72 missiles exactly, not maybe 10 or 20 but 72! odd high number isn't it? well isn't it?! The character story arcs are just all over the place with little sense or connection, its all so vague. The only reason Khan doesn't set off the bomb in London by himself at the start is so they could introduce his super blood into the plot. There is no other reason for that entire sequence with the black man and his daughter. Oh and an exploding ring? eh? wut?? On the subject of Khan's super blood why does everyone tear around trying to get his blood, why not use some of the blood from his crew? surely theirs is super too, isn't it? On the subject of Khan I really must say I don't understand what the fuss was about with Cumberbatch. Now I'm not saying the guy did a bad job, not at all, but as far as I'm concerned his performance on the whole was just very average, his entire range boiled down to over pronunciation of his words. As a character he wasn't particularly interesting either, a very bland generic looking bad guy (or was he? he just wanted to save his crew) who blended into the background, accept when he's killing everyone like an unstoppable superhero (Khan never did that in the original second Trek film). I also think Cumberbatch is miscast in the role frankly, he's so dull looking, so uniform, that it destroys the character of Khan. There is nothing special about the guy anymore, no flair, no razzle dazzle, its just a bog standard looking white guy. Why didn't they cast a man from South Asia or at least someone with a clear ethnic background. Old Spock calls him by his full name in the film, Khan Noonien Singh, but he's white!! clearly white British with a British accent for Pete's sake. And while I'm on the subject what exactly is Khan's game? save his crew...check, errrr...and then? What is his goal? old Spock reckons to kill everyone inferior to himself, but Khan never says that I believe, I don't think we ever get told what he actually wants to do...after saving his crew. On the whole there is so much badly written plot in here it just ruins whatever it was they were trying for...and I'm not sure what really. Khan's super blood cures death and they have him captured so that means no one will ever die in this universe now? there is a cure for most death related injuries and a good supply of blood if they can keep Khan alive. As said old Spock turns up AGAIN!, whenever they are really in the shit he just pops up and tells them everything they need to know almost like a videogame cheat. Yet how the hell does he manage to get in contact with them? its like some kind of Jedi trick. There also seems to be interplanetary transporters now...sooooo doesn't that do away with the need for spaceships? oh and cold fusion doesn't...ah who cares. The idea of a cure for death brings me to the death of Spock in the classic film. That was a shockwave for everybody at the time, I don't think people saw it coming, no one really knew if he was gonna come back, could he come back? was that it for the lovable legendary Spock? In this film we see Kirk get killed in a silly play on that iconic sequence. The difference is we know for a fact he won't really be dead because he is the main flipping character and we've only been given two films in the new reboot franchise, so of course he will come back. This makes the entire scene completely devoid of any emotion, in fact its pretty pointless, utter fail of a scene. That of course in turn leads me to mention the iconic [i]'KHAAANNNN!'[/i] moment. We all know of the classic version of course but what of this regurgitated version? Well its kinda silly really, the fact is these two guys have only known each other for a relatively short period of time (two films), so again the emotions don't really bubble much when Spock blubbers over Kirk, zero emotions in fact. Plus of course as I just mentioned we all know that Kirk will definitely be back from the dead somehow (oh wait, where did they find a Tribble?) so the whole thing is just plain dumb. These moments are in the new film purely to get the hardcore old school Trekkies wet and a rather weak attempt to be clever simply by reversing stuff when in fact its more of an insult to the 82 film. Spock died in the original so lets make Kirk die here, Kirk screams out Khan so lets...you get the drift, genius writing huh. I feel bad giving this a poor write up because there are elements in this I like, loved the new look Klingons and their Predator-like masks, nicely aggressive and intimidating and I enjoyed the space jump sequence. The main problem is this isn't a Star Trek film, its not a proper Trekkie flick, its merely a generic action flick set in space that just happens to be the Star Trek universe. You could quite easily replace the Star Trek crew with John McClane and call it a Die Hard film. Long gone are the slow moving, character based genuine science fiction Trek films, its all shooting, death, explosions and the obligatory destruction porn which seems to be a complete requirement these days. As a stand alone film the first Trek reboot was a fine film, this sequel is simply loud messy action folly with lavish visuals. There isn't really much I can recommend here if you're a true Star Trek fan, regular film goers may enjoy it of course but that's only because this isn't proper Star Trek (which is what they were aiming for). All I can say is I really hope they don't try and reuse more of the classic films, why not try and make you're own classic cinematic moments instead of copying some one else's. A reasonably entertaining watch no doubt but hardly memorable or groundbreaking, wholly average, very lazy, very jumbled, half a mark up for visuals.

Phil Hubbs
Phil Hubbs

Super Reviewer

Star Trek Into Darkness Quotes

Discussion Forum

Discuss Star Trek Into Darkness on our Movie forum!

News & Features