Ralph Breaks the Internet
Mission: Impossible - Fallout
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
No consensus yet.
No consensus yet.
All Critics (20)
| Top Critics (7)
| Fresh (7)
| Rotten (13)
The resulting domestic tension is rife with darkly comedic and dramatic possibilities that were better exploited on the printed page, where King was able to more fully delineate his heroine's tortured thought process.
A wry, old-fashioned thriller adapted by King from his short story.
It's arguably the dullest King film yet, despite solid work by LaPaglia to save it and a decent set-up that goes absolutely nowhere.
Mr. King's script offers a wealth of behavioral details, notably in the conversations between Bob and Darcy, which put a deliciously perverse twist on conjugal familiarity.
Much thinner than you would expect.
In his approach to bringing his own story to the screen, the author gave no consideration for actual performance or humor, valuing his language over all else.
Veteran actors Allen, Lapaglia and Stephen Lang add a level of gravitas that sells the material, countering the matter-of-fact direction from Peter Askin that lends the air of a made-for-TV movie. But they can do only so much with a story this listless.
... lacks consistent suspense and relies too often on genre cliches instead of the clever twists that such material usually commands.
Suspenseful and compelling with great camera work and fine performances by Joan Allen and Anthony LaPaglia, despite an ending that feels rushed and contrived.
Slick and haunting, this film delves into the things that hold a marriage together in a way only Stephen King would even begin to attempt.
Creepy but underwhelming tale of a truly killer marriage.
A Good Marriage comes off as curiously flat for a movie about a woman who sleeps next to a murderer every night.
Nothing too surprising
Average. Didn't hate it, but it fell flat of what it could have been.
Not a particularly good movie to be honest. It's one that fails to fully realize the potential of its story from Darcy's viewpoint and what must be going through her mind as she discovers that the life she has led with her husband of 25 years has been a total lie. At least from how she views Bob after finding out that he is a serial killer. Films are, obviously, a more limiting form of storytelling than TV series or books. In a television series, you have considerably more time, over a number of episodes, in order to tell the story you want, within reason of course. A book, or a short story in a book full of them, can be as long as you want it to be. So you can play around with the character more than you would with a film, where you have a very limited amount of time. There's a reason that a lot of films, with the exception of superhero films and other epic-type films, don't go over 2 hours very often. But the movie doesn't do a good job at making its lead character sympathetic or likable. Finding out that the father of your children, the man you've loved for 25 years, is a notorious serial killer and that's not a knowledge that's easy to grasp. I understand that concept, but the film does it in as one-dimensional manner as is possible. There's no exploration of the strife that causes between Bob and Darcy. Darcy, upon being confronted by Bob about her finding out the truth, decides to keep her mouth shut in order to protect her family from any of the blow-back, which was bound to happen if she went straight to the cops. The problem is that when Darcy DOES decide to do something about it it's only because she had a vision of her daughter being killed like one of the women Bob killed. It's not even because she was just tired of covering up for a man and would, hopefully, give the families of the victims some kind of closure. No, it's because she had a VISION of her daughter being murdered by Bob. She didn't defend her daughter from an actual attack by Bob, she just had a vision of it. I'm sorry, but that makes Darcy come across as incredibly unlikable. She had knowledge that would give the families of the victims some sort of closure and she refused to give it to them because she was worried about how it would affect HER and HER family. She never once thought about the victims, all of whom were daughters to someone, it was all about her and her own family. I guess you could call it human nature, I call it shitty character development. It lays to waste a solid performance from Joan Allen. Not to mention the fact that the whole film feels completely empty. There's nothing here to justify the film being as long as it is and it's not even that fucking long in the first place. This is a 1-hour episode of any anthology series out there. The fact that this was stretched into a feature length film is grossly unjustified. There's this whole TV movie quality to the entire film, there's no real edge to any of what's going on here. There's no weight to any of it. And this is ironic considering the fact that Big Driver, an actual Lifetime TV movie, is so much better than this. I'm not even kidding. I realize I gave it an average rating, but considering how bad this movie is, this is like the difference between Date Movie and There Will Be Blood. Well, I wouldn't actually go that far. I'm prone to hyperbolic statements every once in a while. But this movie is terrible, outside of Joan Allen and she can only do so much. I wouldn't recommend this at all and I wish I had seen something else.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.