Summer in February (2014)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: It boasts beautiful scenery, but in every other respect, Summer in February is a painfully bland period drama.

Summer in February Videos

Summer in February Photos

Movie Info

A sweeping romance set at a bohemian artist colony on the picturesque coasts of pre-war England, SUMMER IN FEBRUARY is based on the true story of painter Sir Alfred Munnings (Dominic Cooper, MAMMA MIA!, MY WEEK WITH MARILYN) and his blue-blood best friend Gilbert (Dan Stevens, "Downton Abbey"). Born into a working-class family, Munnings rises to become one of the premiere British artists of his time, winning the affection of aristocratic beauty Florence Carter-Wood (Emily Browning, SLEEPING BEAUTY). But when Gilbert falls for Florence as well, a love triangle emerges with tragic consequences. (c) Tribeca
Rating: NR
Genre: Art House & International , Drama , Special Interest , Romance
Directed By: Christopher Menaul
Written By: Jonathan Smith
In Theaters: limited
On DVD:
Runtime:
Tribeca Film - Official Site

Cast

Dominic Cooper
as Al Munnings
Emily Browning
as Florence Carter-Wood
Dan Stevens (IV)
as Gilbert Evans
Hattie Morahan
as Laura Knight
Shaun Dingwall
as Harold Knight
Max Deacon
as Joey Carter-Wood
Nicholas Farrell
as Mr. Carter-Wood
Michael Maloney
as Col. Paynter
Camille O'Sullivan
as Gypsy Woman
Jane Cussons
as Birdwatcher
Daphne Neville
as Birdwatcher
Seth Lakeman
as Fiddler
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Summer in February

Critic Reviews for Summer in February

All Critics (38) | Top Critics (5)

Compared with the tepid contretemps of "Summer in February," the soap-opera theatrics of "Downton Abbey" have the depth of Chekhov.

Full Review… | January 16, 2014
New York Times
Top Critic

Cooper stomps around ineffectually, Stevens makes for a blandly tame suitor, and Browning is unable to ignite any chemistry with either. The scenery is stunning. But the swooning has all the heat of a midwinter's swim.

Full Review… | January 16, 2014
New York Daily News
Top Critic

A ceaselessly bland take on the famed Lamorna artists' colony in Cornwall, circa 1911.

Full Review… | January 14, 2014
Village Voice
Top Critic

Blah Britpic offers scenery but little else.

Full Review… | January 14, 2014
Hollywood Reporter
Top Critic

A poor script and patchy performances drag down this Edwardian-era drama.

Full Review… | January 14, 2014
Variety
Top Critic

The performances are but one eye roll-inducing aspect of a period drama so generic and formulaic that it verges on parody.

Full Review… | June 21, 2016
The Film Stage

Audience Reviews for Summer in February

summer in february not that unusual if u live in the southern hemisphere but here make a period pic about UK artists/painters in the merchant/Ivoray tradition and well made too.

Greg Wood
Greg Wood
½

A bland romantic period drama that starts off interesting enough, as there are a lot of early 20th-century poetry, paintings, and music involved. However, staying for the whole 100 minutes duration of the film is a regrettably sour experience. The love story is transformed into complete disarray, as the Murphy's law went into full effect in the most painful way possible (without having to go into the horror genre). Dominic Cooper, Dan Stevens, and Emily Browning gave great performances, but apart from that, this film is not worth watching unless you have a masochistic streak.

Thomas Andrikus
Thomas Andrikus

Overview: A period drama in which a woman decides between slightly boring but dependable, and a talented, slightly erratic, artist. Trigger Warning(s): Scene of attempted rape Review (with Spoilers) It has been almost a year since I have last seen an Emily Browning movie, and while I could have certainly watched Pompei, I didn't want to since it seemed so bleh. However, with Summer in February I thought this was going to be a cute period drama, something which could work well for Browning since she seems destined, due to her porcelain doll looks, to be in quite a few British period dramas. But with her not having the best record when it comes to movies, at least with me, does this one continue the trend or break it? Characters & Story After having a fight with her father about a man who was the perfect match for her, Florence (Emily Browning) runs away to live with her brother Joey (Max Deacon) in the pursuit of not just getting away from their father, but also to paint. And what better a place to end up for with the great AJ Munnings (Dominic Cooper) sharing the same circle as Joey, as well as Harold Knight (Shaun Dingwall), there are many possible teachers and mentors in town. Though it seems with Florence's beauty, these artist would prefer her to replace local model Dolly (Mia Austen) over really providing tutelage. So she has to force the point she came to learn to paint. However, in the pursuit of justifying her stay to her father, she ends up attracting two men. The first being AJ, the wild and passionate painter, and then Gilbert (Dan Stevens) who is this calm, cool, and collected military man. And while the film, at first, presents Florence as a girl who isn't looking for love, just good company, knowledge, and maybe someone to match wits with, she soon falls for one of these boys and the quality of the film falls with it. Praise As noted in the introduction, Browning certainly has the perfect look for a period drama. Add in the right amount of cheekiness she possesses in her voice, as well as a look which screams naivety, innocence, and perhaps privilege, and I think you have a prime candidate for a Jane Austen adaptation. However, in terms of this story, while Austen-esque sarcasm isn't on display, for the first 40 or so minutes Browning is quite a sight and her character Florence seems like someone who demands to be taken seriously. With this you are presented a rather interesting picture in which a woman seems to not mind male attention, even enjoys it a bit, but seems committed to becoming a better artist over anything else. Which, for me, I thought was a perfect direction for the film. Though with it being based on a true story, and set in the early 1900s, I should have knew it was too good to be true. Criticism If just because, unfortunately, with Florence falling in love, or perhaps more so in great admiration, her story as an artist slips away as she ends up a love interest. One who seemingly picked the wrong man, slowly loses reason to draw, and becomes a bore to watch. Mostly due to all her wit, and any sense of moxy, just disappearing. Making the hour after she becomes married, at first, a bit interesting since we see her deal with insecurities and what not, but after a while things feel like they are just dragging on and it makes you wish what happened in those first 40 minutes still was going on rather than the mess you are left with. Overall: TV Viewing Despite rarely giving any Emily Browning film an overall positive review, I do remain a fan. Not just because I think she is attractive either, if anything I think it is because she certainly has talent, but the issue is she doesn't find films which are good throughout. They start off strong but once the drama starts to really kick in, usually the film falls apart. Which is what leads to the TV Viewing label for this film since the film started good, not strong but good, and I liked seeing Browning use her great ability to seem vulnerable, a bit cheeky, and certainly someone who could hold her own against not just the male gaze, but all the talent around her. However, once she got diminished to a love interest it was all downhill. Her life became about who her husband may have been with, her wondering if she made the right decision, and then her wanting to escape from her husband. All making for the type of drama done far too much for this film to not put any effort into trying to stand out and make things interesting.

Amari Sali
Amari Sali

Discussion Forum

Discuss Summer in February on our Movie forum!

News & Features