The Lost City of Z (2017)
Critic Consensus: The Lost City of Z's stately pace and visual grandeur hearken back to classic exploration epics, and Charlie Hunnam turns in a masterful performance as its complex protagonist.
The Lost City of Z Videos
The Lost City of Z Photos
Watch it now
News & Interviews for The Lost City of Z
Critic Reviews for The Lost City of Z
Miller's riveting, heartfelt portrayal etches a delicate picture underneath the colorful, wild portrait of Fawcett - of the losses suffered at home in service of greater ambitions and fantastical dreams.
Although The Lost City of Z held my interest, it felt like a missed opportunity. Like too many biographical movies, this one tries to do too much.
There is an unexploitative, unsensational grounding to the whole affair that lends it dignity, but that doesn't quite justify the 140-minute runtime.
The never-ending jungle proves perfectly suited to the filmmaker's lush, operatic aesthetic, as does the film's central theme of escaping one's background, through whatever means necessary.
It's a bold journey and it's a little bonkers, but like Fawcett, "The Lost City of Z" is admirable in its resilience.
Audience Reviews for The Lost City of Z
Let it not be said that The Lost City of Z doesn't attempt something large. Let also not be said that I was entertained for more than a couple of seconds at a time throughout the whole damn thing.
"The Lost City of Z" is absolutely spellbinding and beautiful. The script, cinematography, acting, costumes, hair, and direction were all excellent. Long after the film ended, I wished I could accompany Hunnam on his quest for this Amazonian Shangri-La.
I become slightly annoyed when watching films like The Lost City of Z, solely because it focusses too much on getting the story right, and leaves the pacing by the wayside. That being said, there is really something special to unravel throughout your viewing of this film. It does feel lengthy, so be ready to invest yourself in a lot of dialogue, but this is a film I'll definitely be recommending in the end. Adventure films have been left in the dust in recent memory, unless you're willing to include the Sci-Fi ones or average movies like Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales. Personally, films like Raiders of the Lost Ark or The Princess Bride just aren't made anymore, but in its own way, The Lost City of Z is a memorable one. Here is why I think it deserves a little more attention than what it's receiving, even though the final film may let some people down. Most adventure films are about having fun and taking audiences on an incredible journey, but The Lost City of Z is a very slow-moving picture that requires your patiences and may even ask you to be forgiving if they never reach their destination by the end of the film. Told throughout a very long period of time, Percival (Charlie Hunnam) is a determined man, who's sole mission is to discover a lost city. After being lost, returning, and going back only to fail once again, this film makes you wonder if they'll ever make it there, or if it even exists. Having to showcase many decades of this man's life, I felt as though the emotional core to this film was easily the strongest aspect. Where The Lost City of Z falters is in its pacing throughout the first two acts. I found myself "checking my watch" throughout the first half of this film, due to the fact that there was nothing particularly engaging. Yes, the jungle sequences are terrifically well-done and the characters are well-drawn enough to enjoy their chemistry on-screen, but the first half just felt very, very slow in my opinion. What this film benefits from is an extreme amount of promise. By the third act of this film when they are about to go on their final excursion, I immediately found myself choking up and invested in this story, but it did feel a little too-little-too-late. On top of this, the conclusion itself is powerful, but I fear that many viewers will be let down. This is a true story, so it's forgiving, but sometimes true stories aren't incredible enough to make an incredible feature film out of. From the commanding performance given by Charlie Hunnam, to the way that Robert Pattinson completely disappears into his character, to the extremely real and believable performance that Tom Holland gives in the third act of this film, these actors held my interest in the events unfolding on-screen, even if I found myself slightly losing interest. This was definitely a story worth telling, but I fear as though it could've been better as something that was very loosely based and turned into an original adventure flick that would've been loved worldwide. Personally, I think this is the best interpretation of this story that could've been done, but the story takes place over the course of so many years that it was losing me at times. It may seem like I'm talking about my gripes more than praising this film, but my overall feelings toward this film are quite the contrary. The Lost City of Z was a very compelling story to see unfold on-screen, the performances are all terrific, and the screenplay was clearly written with care, but it's the pacing that really throws the film off course for me. In the end, I would definitely recommend this film, but to a mature audience, due to the fact that the subject matter is to be taken very seriously and the time period will definitely be a turn-off for most of the younger viewers. It's worth checking out for sure, but I can see many people becoming bored throughout their experience with this film. In my opinion, The Lost City of Z is a very solid movie that's worth watching at least once.
The Lost City of Z Quotes
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.
Discuss The Lost City of Z on our Movie forum!