Two Brothers - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Two Brothers Reviews

Page 1 of 6
June 25, 2004
Brothers can't avoid the sappy Disney touches -- even though it comes from Universal.
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
June 25, 2004
There is a lot in Two Brothers I admire. Families will not go wrong in attending this film. Some kids will think it's one of the best movies they've seen. My objections are of a sort that won't occur, I realize, to many of the viewers.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 29, 2004
Annaud's tigers are benign.
Full Review | Original Score: C
June 25, 2004
I would have gladly volunteered to lead all the tigers participating in this movie directly into the wilds, just to stop them 'acting' in this slow-moving, heavy-handed drama.
June 25, 2004
Loses its 'family film' lustre with all the tiger killing/cruelty, but manages to redeem itself in the end...recommended only as a rental.
Full Review | Original Score: 6/10
June 25, 2004
Works best when showing the animals in nature, not dwelling on the cruelty they are forced to endure. There's an awful lot of tiger killing for an animal-lover movie.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
June 28, 2004
There's something awfully disturbing about Two Brothers, and it's not the fact that Guy Pearce is in it.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
June 25, 2004
Sentimental but openly corny.
Full Review | Original Score: C
June 30, 2004
The tigers are roaring but the movie is boring
Full ReviewRead More | Original Score: 4/10
June 25, 2004
Two Brothers isn't a sequel to the 1988 nature hit The Bear, yet it feels like one. It suffers from the lack of inspiration that plagues many second chapters, and it attempts to broaden the original concept to diminished effect.
June 24, 2004
Astonishingly dreadful.
Full Review | Original Score: D
July 23, 2004
It's undoubtedly good-natured, old-fashioned family entertainment, but Two Brothers never quite manages to strike a successful balance between fantasy and reality.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
June 25, 2004
It is a good thing the tigers at the center of Two Brothers give such strong performances. Without them, the movie would be a lifeless bore.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
August 19, 2004
Annaud's methods are misleading which undermine his admirable intent.
Full Review
July 2, 2004
Teems with life and a rather beautiful simplicity when Annaud focuses squarely on the tiger cubs - but then the humans come crashing in to make a mess of things.
| Original Score: 2.5/4
June 22, 2004
Animal-loving kids will think it's lovely, but it's only a mildly diverting time-waster for the rest of us.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
June 27, 2004
The tiger cub actors are really precious. The same can't be said of the human actors or the script.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
July 1, 2004
I was put off by the way the movie anthropomorphizes the tigers.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
April 9, 2004
While audiences will gasp at the audacity of using real animals instead of drawings, the tale behind the technical achievement is stale and outmoded.
June 2, 2004
Charms when the quadripeds stalk the action but creaks when the bipeds open their mouths.
Page 1 of 6