Two Brothers - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Two Brothers Reviews

Page 1 of 6
Top Critic
Roger Moore
Orlando Sentinel
June 25, 2004
Brothers can't avoid the sappy Disney touches -- even though it comes from Universal.
| Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
June 25, 2004
There is a lot in Two Brothers I admire. Families will not go wrong in attending this film. Some kids will think it's one of the best movies they've seen. My objections are of a sort that won't occur, I realize, to many of the viewers.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Dennis Schwartz
Ozus' World Movie Reviews
June 29, 2004
Annaud's tigers are benign.
Full Review | Original Score: C
Top Critic
Desson Thomson
Washington Post
June 25, 2004
I would have gladly volunteered to lead all the tigers participating in this movie directly into the wilds, just to stop them 'acting' in this slow-moving, heavy-handed drama.
John Venable
Supercala.com
June 25, 2004
Loses its 'family film' lustre with all the tiger killing/cruelty, but manages to redeem itself in the end...recommended only as a rental.
Full Review | Original Score: 6/10
June 25, 2004
Works best when showing the animals in nature, not dwelling on the cruelty they are forced to endure. There's an awful lot of tiger killing for an animal-lover movie.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
David Nusair
Reel Film Reviews
June 28, 2004
There's something awfully disturbing about Two Brothers, and it's not the fact that Guy Pearce is in it.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Sean O'Connell
Eclipse Magazine
June 25, 2004
Sentimental but openly corny.
Full Review | Original Score: C
Jackie K. Cooper
jackiekcooper.com
June 30, 2004
The tigers are roaring but the movie is boring
Full Review| Original Score: 4/10
Top Critic
Lisa Rose
Newark Star-Ledger
June 25, 2004
Two Brothers isn't a sequel to the 1988 nature hit The Bear, yet it feels like one. It suffers from the lack of inspiration that plagues many second chapters, and it attempts to broaden the original concept to diminished effect.
Eugene Novikov
Film Blather
June 24, 2004
Astonishingly dreadful.
Full Review | Original Score: D
Nick De Semlyen
Empire Magazine
July 23, 2004
It's undoubtedly good-natured, old-fashioned family entertainment, but Two Brothers never quite manages to strike a successful balance between fantasy and reality.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
Paul Doro
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
June 25, 2004
It is a good thing the tigers at the center of Two Brothers give such strong performances. Without them, the movie would be a lifeless bore.
| Original Score: 2/4
Michael Drakulich
Star Newspapers (Chicago, IL)
August 19, 2004
Annaud's methods are misleading which undermine his admirable intent.
Full Review
Jonathan R. Perry
Tyler Morning Telegraph (Texas)
July 2, 2004
Teems with life and a rather beautiful simplicity when Annaud focuses squarely on the tiger cubs - but then the humans come crashing in to make a mess of things.
| Original Score: 2.5/4
Jamie Russell
BBC.com
June 22, 2004
Animal-loving kids will think it's lovely, but it's only a mildly diverting time-waster for the rest of us.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
Steve Rhodes
Internet Reviews
June 27, 2004
The tiger cub actors are really precious. The same can't be said of the human actors or the script.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Mike McGranaghan
Aisle Seat
July 1, 2004
I was put off by the way the movie anthropomorphizes the tigers.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Top Critic
Judith Prescott
Hollywood Reporter
April 9, 2004
While audiences will gasp at the audacity of using real animals instead of drawings, the tale behind the technical achievement is stale and outmoded.
Top Critic
Derek Elley
Variety
June 2, 2004
Charms when the quadripeds stalk the action but creaks when the bipeds open their mouths.
Page 1 of 6