Under Fire: Journalists In Combat (2011) - Rotten Tomatoes

Under Fire: Journalists In Combat (2011)



Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.

Under Fire: Journalists In Combat Photos

Movie Info

Under Fire: Journalists In Combat is about the psychological and emotional toll of covering wars. A key member of our team is Dr Anthony Feinstein, the psychiatrist who has been virtually on-call to CNN, CBS, BBC, Reuters and other international news outfits. Among the participants are major war journalists from such outfits as the New York Times; BBC, Times of London and others. This film will weave portraits of journalists - some who have done well and some not so well - and some who have survived physically but succumbed emotionally to what they went through. Many are now able to put their emotional odysseys into perspective, while others are still severely troubled. -- (C) Official Site
Documentary , Special Interest
Directed By:
Written By:
In Theaters:

Watch it now


Critic Reviews for Under Fire: Journalists In Combat

All Critics (14) | Top Critics (7)

Harrowing documentary details the traumas of combat journalism.

Full Review… | December 5, 2011
Hollywood Reporter
Top Critic

Sometimes agonizingly powerful.

Full Review… | December 2, 2011
Christian Science Monitor
Top Critic

Under Fire reckons with its subject in straightforward but engrossingly tough-minded fashion.

Full Review… | December 2, 2011
Top Critic

For once the talking-heads format is satisfying. You want to hear these thoughtful, articulate and sometimes self-lacerating men and women describe their experiences and traumas.

Full Review… | December 1, 2011
New York Times
Top Critic

Important and gripping, with a focus on PTSD.

Full Review… | December 1, 2011
New York Daily News
Top Critic

Fascinating and often devastating.

Full Review… | November 29, 2011
Village Voice
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Under Fire: Journalists In Combat


Films as hard-hitting as Under Fire: Journalists in Combat don't come along very often. Here's a documentary that turns its lens toward those with their camera lenses on war and destruction. It's a talking heads piece that couldn't be more well-served by this format. The stories told by these broken individuals are horrifying, and photographs and images would probably have made it unbearable to watch. But listening to them is both manageable and extremely moving. The film's structure is simple enough. A number of prominent war photojournalists share their hopes, fears, and the reasons they can't stop doing what they do. They've all been in serious danger on more than one occasion, but the rush they feel being so close to death is too powerful to give up. This ultimately leads many of them to depression, PTSD, and alcoholism. And though they definitely regret certain actions, I'm not sure they wouldn't go back to all this if asked. We saw a similar thesis presented in The Hurt Locker, but there's something about hearing it directly from those who have lived it that makes that message hit home harder. Watching these men-most of whom are very tough and gruff and proud-absolutely break down is painful, mainly because I don't know how they manage to keep it together as well as they do. The things they've seen are horrific, and I can only imagine how hard it must be to escape. I can also see, however, what draws them into this line of work and how it might be difficult to come home and cover town hall meetings and such. Visually, the film employs some dreamlike imagery that's mostly effective, especially when the subjects discuss their recurring, PTSD-induced nightmares. Beyond that, however, the film is stylistically bare. It looks and sounds a little rough around the edges, which might hold it back come Oscar-nomination time. As far as I'm concerned, however, this should be one of your five nominees, hands down. It's as close to an "everyone should see this" film as I've encountered this year, whether you're in the media, politics, the military, or a firefighter or something. This isn't just a film for journalism dorks like me. It's frightening non-fiction that should make everyone thankful for the work these men and women do. http://www.johnlikesmovies.com/under-fire-journalists-in-combat/

John Gilpatrick
John Gilpatrick

Important film. Searing. Intense. Live in reality to know what happens to war correspondents and photojournalists, so very valuable for the images they send us. Without them, we have such a sanitized view of what our country and our allies do to others (the "others"?) during wars and conflicts.

Marti Garlett
Marti Garlett

Under Fire: Journalists In Combat Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Discussion Forum

Discuss Under Fire: Journalists In Combat on our Movie forum!

News & Features