The Underneath Reviews

Page 1 of 2
February 27, 2021
A solid, but unremarkable neo-noir.
January 30, 2021
...an erratic yet mostly rewarding thriller that benefits substantially from its strong performances and often enthralling visuals...
August 16, 2017
Pulp Fiction fresh.
September 13, 2011
Stylish, arty and quite enjoyable.
September 7, 2011
September 7, 2010
An absorbing, if an occasionally plodding, experience.
August 31, 2006
One of Soderbbergh's weakest (and unnecessary) films, this exercise in film noir, a remake of the 1949 classic Criss Cross, is marred by weak dialogue and formulaic plot, again stressing the need of a gifted helmer like Soderbergh for stronger narrative
October 9, 2005
August 30, 2004
Too chaotic to work as a thriller.
January 29, 2004
December 3, 2003
Enquanto investe no desenvolvimento de seus personagens, o filme impressiona. Pena que acabe se perdendo ao insistir em vrias reviravoltas pouco convincentes.
May 16, 2003
September 3, 2002
February 28, 2002
Really enjoyable, especially if you like intricate flashbacks and multiple storylines.
February 13, 2001
What The Underneath lacks is the kind of emotional connection that the best film noirs have. Instead of involving, this film is distancing, too given to admiring its own shiny surface.
January 1, 2000
A departure from the run-of- the-mill thriller.
January 1, 2000
he movie's strong points (including some nice work by Gallagher) manage to outweigh the negatives.
January 1, 2000
As tales of sex and sinfulness go, Soderbergh's fourth film doesn't deliver.
January 1, 2000
A diverting piece of moviemaking, thanks primarily to fine direction by Soderbergh.
January 1, 2000
Downbeat, laconically funny, arty (maybe a touch too arty), it's simmering, smoldering lowlife fun, like a good episode of Twin Peaks without the self-conscious weirdness.
Page 1 of 2