Underworld: Evolution Reviews

Page 2 of 6
March 17, 2006
... triste constatar que qualquer bobagem pode dar origem a uma série caso obtenha um sucesso - mesmo moderado - de bilheteria.
March 3, 2006
See it if you dig on action, vampires, werewolves, a little bit of story and plenty of bloody fun.
February 18, 2006
Silly fun but still, it's fun!
February 11, 2006
Just one big bloody mess.
February 11, 2006
The murkily atmospheric sets resemble the ruins and prisons of Piranesi.
February 11, 2006
Just how much of the 105-minute running time of Underworld: Evolution, the sequel to the titular 2003 film, is actually a new movie is debatable since a good deal is told in flashback.
February 11, 2006
February 11, 2006
It's not quite quick enough to be anywhere near as gloomily engaging as the cast's original outing.
February 11, 2006
February 11, 2006
[Underworld: Evolution is] silly and ... not as good as the first film but at least it has plenty of action in it to keep the Friday night crowd happy.
February 11, 2006
February 11, 2006
So dedicated to its ludicrously convoluted plot that it takes half an hour to explain what the hell is going on.
February 2, 2006
A worthy sequel and a bloody good ride.
January 31, 2006
Underworld: Evolution is what an Uwe Boll movie would look like if Sony's money were behind it rather than German financiers and if it lacked any unintended laughs.
January 30, 2006
It's like the story of Father Abraham if it were crazy and incoherant.
January 30, 2006
Underworld: Evolution is a surprising ride. It's not the greatest film ever, but by the time the end credits rolled, I had fun.
January 29, 2006
The movie isn't funny or campy or terribly exciting or very interesting, but it's not egregiously dimwitted or insulting, either.
January 27, 2006
Despite a better story this time, director Len Wiseman follows the same action-movie formula.
January 27, 2006
Underworld goes overboard.
Page 2 of 6