Vampire in Brooklyn - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Vampire in Brooklyn Reviews

Page 1 of 2
Michael Dequina
TheMovieReport.com
January 7, 2005
Never funny enough to pass muster as a comedy and never scary enough (if at all) to make it as a horror movie.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Luke Y. Thompson
New Times
December 11, 2003
Given the talent involved, it's almost impressive how much of a misfire the film is.
| Original Score: 2/5
Alex Sandell
Juicy Cerebellum
February 12, 2003
Oh, Wes, what did we all do to deserve this?
| Original Score: 0/5
Gerry Shamray
Your Movies (cleveland.com)
February 6, 2003
Is it comedy? Is it horror? Uneven film that never lives up to its potential as either.
| Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
Peter Stack
San Francisco Chronicle
June 18, 2002
Vampire in Brooklyn is neither funny nor frightening and comes up a tedious middle-road hybrid from veteran scaremeister Wes Craven, who directed.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
Wade Major
Boxoffice Magazine
June 5, 2002
Essentially little more than a romantic triangle with a 'good versus evil' twist, it's not a bad film, but it is also neither winningly funny enough to exploit Murphy's talents nor bitingly scary enough to exploit Craven's.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Catherine Cantieri
Apollo Guide
May 14, 2002
The horror relies on special effects so obvious that the scares are compromised.
| Original Score: 41/100
Top Critic
Liam Lacey
Globe and Mail
April 12, 2002
Neither as good as it might be nor as bad as you might expect.
Top Critic
James Berardinelli
ReelViews
January 1, 2000
Doesn't live up to its promise or premise.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
January 1, 2000
To call this a comedy is a sign of optimism; to call it a comeback for Murphy is a sign of blind faith.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
Top Critic
Hal Hinson
Washington Post
January 1, 2000
Craven can't keep the comic elements in balance with the horror, and as a result there's no tension or dramatic pull.
Top Critic
Desson Thomson
Washington Post
January 1, 2000
This modern fable is little more than a Murphy potboiler, something to while away a couple of hours, rather than fondly remember.
Liz Braun
Jam! Movies
January 1, 2000
A big, glossy and mostly puerile project bound to please Murphy's fans.
| Original Score: 3/5
Madeleine Williams
Cinematter
January 1, 2000
Kadeem Hardison is the best thing about this film, playing Maximillian's slowly rotting ghoul henchman. However; one has to wonder about a film where Eddie Murphy needs comic relief.
Full Review | Original Score: 0.5/4
Top Critic
Susan Stark
Detroit News
January 1, 2000
They're no match, though, for the crushing disappointment of having to watch Murphy on the comic sidelines. It's like going to a Barbra Streisand concert and being asked to listen with her while the rhythm section sings.
| Original Score: 2/4
Marc Savlov
Austin Chronicle
January 1, 2000
Neither all that scary nor all that hilarious, Vampire in Brooklyn falls directly between the two, into the valley of mediocrity.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Chris Hicks
Deseret News, Salt Lake City
January 1, 2000
Murphy's performance is pretty good most of the way, but he needed a stronger director than horrormeister Wes Craven to keep him in check.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Top Critic
Susan Wloszczyna
USA Today
January 1, 2000
Murphy's pale efforts are enough to make one fondly recall Blacula. Now that was one sucker who knew how to make a film that didn't.
| Original Score: 1.5/4
Bryant Frazer
Bryant Frazer's Deep Focus
January 1, 2000
The bottom line is that Vampire in Brooklyn is funny and gross, but saddled with a pedestrian storyline that denies any real magic in its premise and sinks its potential as a dark fantasy.
Full Review | Original Score: C+
Scott Rosenberg
San Francisco Examiner
January 1, 2000
Lightweight fun.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Page 1 of 2