Wedding Crashers - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Wedding Crashers Reviews

Page 1 of 10
July 15, 2005
...ultimately done in by the need to abide by Hollywood convention and send everyone home in a joshing good mood.
Read More | Original Score: C+
July 14, 2005
There are individual moments that are very funny. But it takes a merciless focus to make a good comedy, and the director, David Dobkin, has too much else on his mind.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
July 15, 2005
If a film is going to be in bad taste, at least it should have the decency to follow through on its convictions, rather than morph into something else.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
July 15, 2005
The film starts out quirky, but settles for the routine. And characters, instead of deepening, flatten out.
January 15, 2008
Guys will have a few laughs but this certainly won't have the rewatch value of the likes of Old School or the Pie movies.
April 16, 2009
Vince Vaughn commits rampant acts of comic zeal while the script around him crumbles in a movie that loses its thrust like a cat caught in traffic.
Full Review | Original Score: C-
July 27, 2005
If you've ever witnessed high-school students try to whip up SNL-type sketch comedy, everything in Wedding Crashers will have a familiar feel.
July 17, 2005
Despite its considerable comic potential, 'Wedding Crashers' features too many silly scenes that made it hard for me to suspend disbelief.
July 17, 2005
Drags the setup scenario out for too long and loses its comical edge in the process.
Full Review | Original Score: C+
July 14, 2005
Crashers slumps badly in the stretch when the filmmakers have to find a way to surprise us when we're fully aware of where the story is going.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
July 15, 2005
It's a pretty lousy movie with some funny parts.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
July 14, 2005
rides its amusing premise like gangbusters for one solid act, but overextends itself the minute it leaves the comfy confines of its smart setup
| Original Score: 2.5/5
July 14, 2005
This is all likely to go over like gangbusters at the box office ... but the overall sloppiness and genial contempt for the viewer is tough to ignore.
August 17, 2010
What should've been an absolutely raucous and no-holds-barred lusty farce is nothing but lame-ass, safe, predictable, lowest common denominator, no-laffs garbage
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
July 15, 2005
Plays like a slightly raunchier variation of the lackluster 1989 Mark Harmon comedy Worth Winning.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
July 18, 2005
Two thirds of the movie is a winning wedding of romance and comedy, but the last one third crashes
Full ReviewRead More | Original Score: 6/10
July 22, 2005
For every robust zinger uncorked by Wilson or Vaughn, Dobkin chases it with a flat or tasteless gag.
July 15, 2005
Beyond the amusing shtick spotlighted in the ad campaign, the picture is a self-nullifying blend of raunch and schmaltz.
Read More | Original Score: 1.5/4
July 15, 2005
The film's pleasures are greatly outnumbered by its failed expectations.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
September 9, 2005
you know there's something wrong with a movie when Christopher Walken doesn't get, or give, even one funny line of dialogue.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Page 1 of 10