Ralph Breaks the Internet
Mission: Impossible - Fallout
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
No consensus yet.
Tomatometer Not Available...
No consensus yet.
All Critics (23)
| Top Critics (1)
| Fresh (17)
| Rotten (6)
The werewolf movie was revived and reworked with a vengeance in 1981 and Wolfen (1981) was a far more radical take on the genre than An American Werewolf in London or The Howling, though not as popular as either.
The often muddled, but scary Wolfen tops The Howling and An American Werewolf in London as the best of 1981's three worthwhile lupine thrillers.
Some sort of mixed-up commentary on gentrification.
Wolfen is a thriller with a metaphysical side to it.
Half silly and half profound.
Sets up its mysteries with an admirable tenacity, though the resolution we're ultimately offered is more than a bit forgettable.
Wolfen goes through the paces of a typical detective thriller, but I'll bet you've never seen anything like it.
I found it easy to root for the werewolves over the derelicts, millionaires, and arrogant police who were victimized.
Adapted from a novel of the same name, yet after a bit of reading the movie is quite different from the book. With a title like this you'd think this film was about werewolves, but you'd be wrong. In fact it kinda depends on what source you go by, the book is sort of about werewolves, a species of creature that are descended from wolves, intelligent and probably more like werewolves than in this film. In the movie there are no werewolves and no creatures descended from the wolf line.
And there lies the problem with this movie, no werewolves. The plot is all about these mysterious murders in New York, bodies are turning up badly mutilated or half eaten and everyone knows there aren't any alligators in the sewers doing this so...what gives?! Fear not, along comes the most unlikely monster hunter in the form of Albert Finney to try and crack the case, with the help of his female partner and the plucky coroner played by Gregory Hines. Now this isn't a jokey action packed supernatural thriller, oh no, its actually a reasonably slow paced detective story as we follow Finney and co snooping around in the Bronx.
For the most part its quite intriguing I can't deny, I had no clue who or what was actually killing these people. You're not so sure if its actually a supernatural beastie or just some looney tune, someone close to Finney perhaps. Without trying to give the game away it is disappointing how they go about this movie, the alterations they make. Like I said in the book there are actually genuine creatures on the prowl, here in the movie they substitute monsters for wolf spirits, or more accurately, Native American wolf spirits. I'm still not sure if these wolves were actually the Native American descendants Finney's character follows up on, these guys claim they are shapeshifters in the movie. Seeing as in the book the creatures are descendants of wolves, it makes sense in this movie that the wolf spirits on the loose are Native American descendants. It never really confirms this concept (I don't think) but I'm guessing the local Natives were the wolves, or they were able to summon them maybe.
What really disappointed me was the fact the wolves actually did look like proper wolves, they actually used real wolves in the movie. This of course ties in with the new Native American angle they use, but I found it an anti-climax because I wanted to see something more terrifying, more of a monster, pack of monsters. The whole movie has this pretty decent eerie atmosphere going on showing us wolf POV, how they stalk their prey, their vision, how they attract prey by making ghostly baby noises etc...Then they merely turn out to be actual wolves that you can see in the zoo or where ever. I didn't find that scary, after all the great buildup, dark moody moments and horrific deaths...they just turn out to be actual wolves.
Speaking of the wolf POV shots, well blow me down if John McTiernan didn't swipe ideas from this movie for 'Predator'. I kid you not! I have read this movie is notable for its early use of thermography/thermal imaging with the wolf vision sequences. You see these sequences and right away you know McTiernan probably pinched the idea for his Arnie vehicle, but jazzed it up a bit with bolder colours. Its these sequences that really add some spice to the wolf antics in the movie, mainly because for the most part you believe its a monster or werewolf and these sequences are darn effective conveying that.
What's more I do firmly believe Alan Silvestri also pinched the musical score from this film for that particular Arnie vehicle! You listen to it throughout this film and its pretty obvious if you ask me, its nearly identical! All this time I thought McTiernan and co had spearheaded such an original franchise and material.
Its certainly dated these days but the gore effects hold up well, very well actually. There's something a bit off about it all though, I guess the sight of these Native American fellas and their own little bar in downtown NY doesn't quite seem to fit in with the surroundings. I can't help but think the whole thing would have worked better in the wilderness or a smallish town out west, the sight of these wolves running around the city looks more out of place than scary really. Again the choice of Finney in the lead was an odd one if you ask me, he also doesn't quite fit into the NY surroundings. Its definitely an off-kilter movie and slightly misleading at the same time, the book does sound much better and more of what you'd expect.
Wolfen has a cool opening and that's about it. None of the originality and shock value that the first five minutes can be reproduced at all in the two hours that follow. Mostly, the movie just contains a ridiculous amount of semi infrared shots that make no sense; supposedly being how these mutant wolves see. Why any viewer needed to be exposed to so much of this lame wolf vision is beyond me. The story is just uninteresting and the ending is so obvious and lame. Albert Finney had no business being in such a b-level movie, surrounded with d-level stars. I think the biggest misconception with this movie is that it's a true werewolf movie; in no way is this even close to being part of the genre. I hate to pick on this movie so much, but there was basically nothing redeeming about it. It fails as a horror movie, a thriller, cop drama, and funnily enough as an urbanization politics piece. There's no noteworthy moments aside from the opening, which isn't worth it in the end.
A strange, confusing, stupid werewolf movie, I hated it.
"wolfen" is a political protest or an ecological dirge upon nature-wrecking urbanization which tends to provoke you into thinking so much that you demean its artistic creavities. besides the audience who chooses to watch "wolfen" has an expectation of horror relish from the werewolf legend hollywood has fromed along since 1930s along with lon chaney jr. in a nutshell, the common audience is more prepared to indulge himself within the gothic escapism of a bizarre supernatural tale instead of an anxious idealistic urge to care for the earth with sacred respect. that's exactly the merit of this movie, to evolve a mundane cheesy horror material into a meaningful interpretation, but that aspect also repulses certain audience attached to classic horror.
the title wolfen says it outloud on what it's about, wolfen, of course. generally it's a metaphor of the retribution civilization, especially american industrialization, would receive after devastating the nature for sorbid profits, and one evident fact would be early american genocide against indians that is compared to a wolf specy which has been distincted on earth, the number of the indians american conquerers had slaughtered could literily emulate hitler to jews. (if you look into the historical diagram) mostly, it utilizes a special digital heat-wave camera perspect to represent the vision of the wolfen detecting the reddish suboteuring elements each individual possess, and the wolfen is supposed to be the villian who ruins others gruesomely, but contrarily the wolfen is the victim of the rest since its homeland has been confiscated by the capitalists and the wolfen's final resident of a wasted building has to be torn down for new urban construction so the wolfen tribe is forced to run amok to eliminate their potential intruders mercilessly. such spirit might have a similarity with "the creature from the black lagoon" trilogy in which creature is only defending the lagoon he occupies, and he's been kidnapped into aquarium as exhibition, then he has to be made to use his lung by the evolution he doesn't desire at the end. but the major differance would be creature is the losing side who's defeated by human weapons but the wolfen is the winning side who's able to practice its revenge to a degree. (maybe that's what upsets some of the audience?)
"wolfen" is a great metaphor which could be considered excellent in the level of literature fable but would the audience enjoy "wolfen" since their primary purpose is some relaxation of other-worldly romanticism or some cheap fright of gore? would people who pick it up on the shelf give a damn to the environment and how long the earth is gonna sustain? from my experiences with people, at most of the time, regular, particularly rightist americans would dismiss anyone who favors organic food or concerned with ecology as hippies, and "trader joe's"(organic market) only opens in california and san fransisco has the biggest branch of this enterprise. so california is hippie-orientated state according to the opinion of some people. they're probably right, most people, particularly americans, take pleasure in making pollutions daily and eating un-healthy greasy food which's gonna give you cancer. (or smoking two packs of mablo a day, annoucing "i don't believe in your orangic shits")..a friend of mine once confided me that the existence of humans itself is a poison to earth, and if you wanna be friendly with the earth, people should get together to commit large-scale of suicides. it's sickeningly cynical but he has his point made. and my point is if you're the "i absolutely detest organic food" type, stay away from "wolfen", if you're leftist or neutral with a open-mind as me, you might be able to appreciate it. (even personally i don't like organic food as well but i can't say it ain't good for health, should i feel bad that organic food become a symbol of political stance?)
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.