Will J.'s Profile - Rotten Tomatoes

Want-to-See Movies

Want-to-See TV

This user has no Want to See TV selections yet.

Rating History

American Psycho
4 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

Okay, I originally gave this movie a 90% rating after just watcing it. Partly becus I heard about how great it was b4 hand, and partly becus I thot I just needed time to process it b4 truly appreciating it as an artform. I was correct, I did need time to process it... to realize it wa a peice of shit. Aside from the line I will be quoting for the rest of my life("Please insert stray cat") this was a movie that was just too weird. It cudnt decide what it wanted to be. It was part horror, part porn, part black comedy, and it didnt do any of it well. It truly does pain me to say this, I wanted to love it. I love Christain Bale, and I love Jared leto, but I depise this film. It's just too strange. You cannot connect with this film, at all. I dont care who you are or wut u claim, no one out there can honsetly connect with it. It has no human element to it. Bale goes so far over the edge, so far away from humanity itself, that you just can't connect. As for all the other characters, they are flat one notes who all seem to quickly meet their grisly end. It goes too graphic on violence for the big screen. Reading about a psychgotic man biting off a woman's vagina is one thing, actually watching it is just way too far. By the time the credits role, you'll have a handful of graphic mental images, a whole lot of questions as to what actually happened and what's going on, and instead of thinking to yourself "Wow, I'm so glad I watched that movie. It was a classic" you'll be thinking "What in God's name possessed me to whatch that? WTF? Why didn't I turn it off? What a waste of two hours." To anyone who has yet to see this film, don't. To anyone who has, I feel your pain.

Young Frankenstein
4 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

Mel Brooks may now be rarely mentioned in pop culture, but make no mistake, a large percentage of the funniest movies in history have his name attatched to them. His unique brand of humor re-defined comedy and proved once and for-all that just because a film sets out to make you laugh, does not mean that it must sacrifice any integrity or quality. Perhaps where this is most obvious is in my personal favorite film of Brooks'; "Young Frankenstein". "Young" is a brilliant comedic film that works for one simple reason: It's a spoof that never thought of itself as a spoof. Brooks' love and passion for the classical horror films of the thirties is clear and so is his goal. To him and Gene Wilder(co-writer & star), "Young" was never about mocking the "Frankenstein" films, it was about making another installment, just in their own odd way. At it's bare bones, it's a very simple joke. After titles such as "Bride of Frankenstein" and "Son of Frankenstein", Frankenstein's grandson is completely embarrassed by his family and wants nothing to do with the nut-jobs' legacy. But from these bare bones, Brooks and Wilder add pound-upon-pound of flesh and blood. The not-so-big secret here is that they were first and foremost, making a great film that could stand side-by-side with the original classics. It is because the concept was taken so seriously, and the material dealt with so affectionately, that the film is that much funnier. Great performances abound in the film, from Wilder, to the late, greats Marty Feldman and Peter Boyle. It is due to the great performances and the care put into the project by Brooks and Wilder, that the film's pacing is absolutely superb. The script is tight, without a hole in it; the mark of great writers who love their source material. If this has all sounded like a kind of love letter to the film, that's exactly what it is. To me "Young Frankenstein" is the funniest film of all time. It's the only film that no matter how many times I watch it, I cry with laughter every single time. I absolutely love it. Its an underrated gem, a diamond in the rough among Mel's films. It's not mentioned as much as "Spaceballs" or "Blazing saddles". But in a way, that only makes me love it more. It makes it feel more like it's mine. My treasure that I stumbled upon. For a film that was made out of a deeply personal love of cinema, perhaps that's the best legacy it could have ever had; to always be out there for cinema buffs to discover and treasure as their own.

The Amazing Spider-Man
4 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes
½

The nicest thing you can say about 'The Amazing Spiderman' is that despite being completely unnecessary and entirely too sudden of a reboot, it is indeed thoroughly enjoyable. I love Sam Raimi's original trilogy, and to hear that a mere decade after the original film they were remaking it, I was beyond skeptical. The film is once again an origin story and that's it's biggest problem, the film can never quite escape the shadow of it's predecessor. Too many moments that should have an impact fall flat because they too closely resemble scenes seen previously. There are certain things that have to happen, and by now the entire audience already knows what those things are. He has to get bitten, Uncle Ben has to die, Peter feels responsible, he vows to avenge his uncle, he hunts down the gunman.. and so it goes. Once the film gets by it's clunky first half that includes Uncle Ben desperately trying, and failing, to find a new catch phrase not involving 'power' or 'responsibility'; it picks up because it truly becomes a spiderman movie. After years of attempts on Raimi's part, The Lizard is finally brought to the screen in this reboot, in a splendid way. He and Spidey practically spend the last half of the movie just transitioning from fight scene to fight scene, but it's undeniably fun to watch, especially in 3D. Despite their best efforts, the finale can't quite steer clear of the tried and true 'Hold on Mary Jane!' formula, putting Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy at the center of the danger as Spiderman and The Lizard have their final showdown. Andrew Garfield does a great job filling the Peter Parker role. Thought not as believable as Maguire, he's great in his own right and manages to pull off a more hipster-ish version of Parker. Emma Stone is the MVP of the film, adding another notch to her vast and impressive resume, as a sweet and capable Gwen Stacy. It is clear that fairly fresh director, Marc Webb, does indeed have a passion for what he is doing here and that he wants to bring Spidey back to the multiplex in the best way he can. Unfortunately, his naivety does show in the film's pacing. He rushes certain moments that should be slower paced, and then takes five minutes to showcase his old music video skills with Peter Parker skating around aimlessly. Overall, 'Amazing Spiderman' is worth the price of admission for the superb action sequences and it's fun-loving attitude. However, in order for it to be anything more than just 'fun', one must completely erase all memories of Raimi's originals. Unfortunately for Webb and co., it has only been a few years and the memories are all too fresh. In the end, it turns out Raimi's shoes are just a little bit too big to be filled.

Prometheus
Prometheus (2012)
4 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes
½

Ridley Scott is back at it in his first sci-fi film in 30 years and Prometheus is a worthy addition to Scott's arsenal. Visually stunning, well-crafted, and just a no holds barred sci-fi film, Prometheus lives up to expectations in the best of ways. Many have specualted over and over again just how much of an 'Alien' film the movie would be. And i suppose the best answer would be to simply say this: it isn't. It exists within the same universe as "Alien" and takes place before it. However, if you go in expecting to see the classic Xenomorphs popping out at you the whole movie, you will be dissapointed. Actually, Prometheus tackles a much more intriguing concept than merely setting up the dominos to go through another rehash of Alien. It truly all revolves around how a being has to cope with it's own existence. We make up things to believe in, religion, science, and endlessly question our purpose. Prometheus is what happens when you finally find the answers to those questions. Horrifying, beautiful, gut-wrenching, and powerful, Scott delivers a tour de force with Prometheus. On par with the first two films in the Alien saga, Prometheus is a mind-blowing, enjoyable film that works on every level.

The Dark Knight
4 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

Does it get any better than this? Christopher Nolan's second act of his Batman trilogy is one of the highest grossing films of all time, and for good reason. "Batman Begins", Nolan's first installment was basically a re-introduction of the Batman character in a grounded, realistic fashion. Gotham felt much more relatable than ever before, as did the caped crusader himself. If "Begins" was a re-establishing of Batman, "Knight" is Mr. Wayne facing the world as his reality crumbles around him. Times have changed in Gotham, Batman has made some real progress on cleaning up the city. But, as hinted at by Gordon's ending monologue in "Begins", the stakes have simply escalated. The Joker emerges as the inverse to Batman. As the Joker states, they are a case of "an unstoppable force meets an immovable object". They are the inverse of each other, and yet all too similar. Though at first rejected by the mob, The Joker eventually turns into a twisted sort of messiah figure for Gotham's underbelly. Heath Ledger's undeniably iconic and brilliant portrayal of a man who just wants to watch the world burn is a large part of what gives this sequel it's chaotic tone. What Nolan does here that is so brilliant, is he never makes you feel like there's downtime, because the film is so character-driven. You're never waiting for the action to pick up, or for Ledger to come onscreen, or for Bruce Wayne to suit up. You're captivated the entire two and a half hours by not only the performances, but the intricate storyline being crafted by the mad genius behind the lens. A film as much about social experimentation as it is about good and evil, "The Dark Knight" is a film that has truly defined it's generation. With the enormously-anticipated follow-up only about a month away now, it is clear that "Dark Knight" has served as perhaps the ultimate stepping stone. During one of the Joker's conversations with Batman, he speaks of a time not far away when Gotham will fall and all will be lost. He claims that he is not odd, just ahead of the curve. In retrospect, this scene acts more as a prophetic build-up than ever before. Will "Dark Knight Rises" provide as stunning of a conclusion as everyone is hoping for? My guess is yes, Christopher Nolan is among the best in the business and from what I've seen "Rises" looks to be an absolutely incredible film. When the end credits hit the screen for the final part of Nolan's trilogy, all will be answered and we will know once and for all if The Joker was indeed speaking the truth of the future, or if he was just bat-shit crazy.