Big Smella's Profile - Rotten Tomatoes

Want-to-See Movies

This user has no Want to See movie selections yet.

Want-to-See TV

This user has no Want to See TV selections yet.

Rating History

Black Mass
Black Mass (2015)
14 months ago via Rotten Tomatoes

Good. Not Great. Depp is awesome. The capturing of the time period is superb. The music, perfectly nuanced. Some great scenes. No complaints. But missing that 'thing' ya know? like ZODIAC had. Would've loved to see Fincher's hand at this.

The Green Inferno
14 months ago via Rotten Tomatoes
½

Man. Should have been epic horror. I've been looking forward to this film for 3yrs. Even called in sick to work to go see it. What a bummer. The cinematography was really poor: composition, focus, and digital blur everywhere. Should have shot on film. The anticipation of the gore was greater than the execution. I mean just the idea had given me nightmares periodically over the last few years from the trailer alone. This is a sad woulda coulda shoulda...but still loveya Eli. Shoot on film next time (like Cabin Fever) and focus! And less is more for horror mi amigo

Transformers: Dark of the Moon
5 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes
½

NOT BAD...And in saying that I don't necessarily mean 'its good,'however, after the last installment - which is most likely the worst movie ever made - this one was nearly on par with the magic of the original. I wasn't bored out of my gourd - well, save for the 1/2 intro that stretched the teaser trailer into an unmanageable length; interwoven with Robert-Zemeck-ian (FORREST GUMP, CONTACT,) JFKennedy-cgi... we've seen this before...boring!) and the films overall length was taxing. However, considering it was yet-another predestined Michael Bay disasterpiece I must say, it was wonderful to turn at my brother for a "Nice!" after a sweet transformation in unique and new executions that were as miraculous as that first Bumblebee vs. Barricade standoff in the original. [*NOTE to the STUBBORN Critics, like myself: Sure I had major apprehension to view this inbred offspring of biomechanical-genetics in human-retardation-mutations...however, any film where a director is responsible for destroying the majority of an entire and actual city - in this instance, Chicago - the film connoisseur must alone appreciate Bay's principal photography; especially considering the long-takes which either start or end with the transformers in idle - and actual (it's not all CGI here folks,) - automobile status, ascend through periods of spectacular slow-mo and culminate seamlessly against the Chicago skyscape and backgrounds. Just imagining the storyboarding and primary shots is mindboggling. Sure there was certainly some of this in the prequels, yet not to this extent; so Kudos! to Bay & Team on this amazing feat.] And how wonderful to view these mutations and seamless transitions between principal footage and CGI without the inept vulgarity from the Transformers, limited and controlled appearances by Sam's heretofore asinine parents, the absence (almost) of pompous female-promiscuity (from Bay's latent, adrenalin and testosterone-fueled teenage-sexual-adolescence), and exemption of visuals featuring Mr. Sector 7's boxers or jockstrap. This movie is too long, but I must say that I had fun: not something experienced too often at the theater these days. One last sour note: aside from the micro-transforming parts while traveling into the depths of the moon-based Autobot - (there should be more of this micro-biomutating! I'd anticipated and hoped for it in the first, all but forgotten it in the sequel, and was like 'Finally!' in viewing the trailer: the motivating factor toward my attendance of this third installment) - the 3D is just as unnecessary as its predecessors which failed to utilize the effect; BEOWULF excluded of course...(Zemeckis!) Oh, and Coraline...and perhaps Cameron's last film - had he not infected and essentially ruined the cinema-experience ceaselessly). In other words: see it in 2D. Actually, from now on, see every film in 2D until someone (Zemeckis?) in possession of a deep-enough imagination arrives to tackle the task. My bets are on Christopher Nolan - although I can't imagine him tampering with an already tainted and ill-taken ideology, based solely on higher ticket prices.