CorwinZ's Profile - Rotten Tomatoes

Want-to-See Movies

This user has no Want to See movie selections yet.

Want-to-See TV

This user has no Want to See TV selections yet.

Rating History

Atlas Shrugged: Part I
6 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

It's stunning that currently 85% of audiences love this movie and applaud it's message of personal achievement but seem to forget a couple of things that are central to the story. The first is that the main message of the book and movie is the danger of the government increasingly asserting control over all industry as it did with Taggart Transcontinental.

These audiences apparently are blind to the fact that in our country the exact opposite is happening. Corporations are in direct and almost complete control of our government and thanks to "Citizen's United", our highest Court. Where is the outcry over that?

Then you have Ayn Rands own thoughts "exploring the consequences when the "men of the mind" go on strike, refusing to allow their inventions, art, business leadership, scientific research, or new ideas to be taken from them by the government or by the rest of the world."

Yet these same audiences are all too happy to let the party they support destroy the institutions that keep "men of the mind" funded in inventions (R&D), art, and scientific research and instead drain all the money to the corporations that Ayn Rand was so worried about the government suppressing.

No worries Ms. Rand, your loyal followers have ensured that not only will government never oppress business but that we will simply supplant government with business. Welcome to the Corporate States of America and we are all its underpaid, non-union workers.

Good job you idiots.

The Last Airbender
6 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

The Last Airbender is visually impressive. The Air Temples are wonderfully imagined and portrayed. The set pieces, CGI and model work are similarly well done.
The costuming is impeccable and well adapted from the animated styles. The clothing of each nation has been masterfully recreated from the cartoon images while making subtle improvements in coloring and texture. The visual effects are in full view and every dollar is clearly there on the screen.
The score is perhaps the best part of this movie. Each scene is enhanced by the music and every turn of the plot is perfectly aligned by themes that are reminiscent of the TV shows soundtrack without being an exact copy.
So why the two star rating?
Well much has been made of the films smothering exposition, but I think some of it was necessary. Even the much maligned narration was kept at a minimum in my opinion.
The acting is below sub-par but with the exception of Noah Ringer and maybe Nicola Peltz, the actors in this film all have modest to very good resumes. While some of them need more experience to hone their skills I don't think any of them have been labeled "bad" actors for their work.
All the elements of a huge success were here:
1. The studio was supportive.
2. The special effects teams are top of the line and respected across the industry.
3. The modeling and CGI were also handled by the best in the business.
4. The costuming and set pieces were extremely well adapted from the TV show.
5. The soundtrack is masterful and also well adapted to the shows style and mood.
6. The actors represent a broad spectrum of talent from just starting to well-seasoned.
7. The source material is possibly the most consistently well written and produced kids cartoon made in this country.
That only leaves the writing and directing and they have one thing in common: M. Night Shyamalan.
But if I criticize his writing then how do I explain the crisp, efficient and deft writing of The Sixth Sense or Signs or even Unbreakable. How could he possible have gone wrong with such strong source material as ATLA?
Perhaps he's only able to write well if it's his own idea. Maybe he simply doesn't possess any talent for adaptation. But then how do I explain the mess of Lady in the Water or The Happening.
No, this is purely a fault in directing my friends. MNS managed to take a project that was almost idiot-proof and single-handedly brought the entire production to its knees and shot it in the head.
Every scene looks as if it were the first or second take; completely unpolished and almost like a first reading. This isn't the first time we've seen MNS do this. Look what he did to Mark Wahlberg in The Happening. This is the same actor that was in The Departed and Four Brothers and The Italian Job. Did Mark Wahlberg suddenly become a bad actor?
This is the directors fault.
Another tell-tale sign of single takes were the painful reaction lags between lines of dialogue.
When you've done several takes of a scene, those lags disappear and the scene becomes more natural, but it seems MNS either doesn't have time for that or is suffering from some sort of directing Asberger's Syndrome where he just doesn't "get" timing or natural interaction between characters.
This disaster is entirely about directing.
But the final rotting cherry on top of this mess was the changing of name pronunciations. I really don't care if the proper pronunciations were being accurately represented - and neither do the fans or the audience.
Aang is pronounced Ay-ng not Ong. Everyone gets that but you Mr. Shyamalan. Furthermore Sokka is prounounced Sock-a not Soak-a.
Your pretentious attempt to correct us ignorant foreigners is offensive especially considering that from the very beginning to the very end of this series the creators of the show had everyone world-wide pronounce them the way we all know them. You had no right to change such a fundamental part of this story - no matter what your intentions.
Every time I found myself almost enjoying the movie a little, those names come up and were like a slap across the face.
It was embarrassing and infuriating.
There's only one director in Hollywood that we let get away with stupid character names and that's George Lucas - but at least he knows how to direct.

...sort of.

How to Train Your Dragon
7 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

After all the mediocre animated films that have come out in the past couple of years (with the exception of such treats as Up and Wall-E) there's a refreshing purity to How To Train Your Dragon.

Not only does Dragon bypass stupid fart jokes and pratfalls in favor of a more genuine kind of humor, but it has enough confidence in itself to not be topical. You won't find any forced and tired pop-culture references here.

How To Train Your Dragon is set in the mythical world of big, beefy Vikings and wild dragons of every type. Based on the book by Cressida Cowell, this movie tells the story of Hiccup, a Viking teenager who doesn't fit in with his people's tradition of heroic dragon slayers. Hiccup's uncanny ability to invent devices and tools becomes his only hope of fitting in, but his world is rocked when one of his inventions wounds a legendary dragon. Believing he's made his first kill, Hiccup sets off to find the body only to discover that the wounded dragon is still alive. What he does then challenges both him and his fellow Vikings to see the world from a different point of view. Together, Hiccup and Toothless (the wounded dragon) begin a relationship that will change both of their worlds forever.

Some have commented that Toothless is reminiscent of Disney's Stitch character and while Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders are the creators of Lilo & Stitch - I really don't think this was their intention.

If you look at a side by side comparison I sort of see what they mean. But the elements that make them similar are also universal constants when it comes to making a creature cute and appealing, i.e. large, dark eyes and a big roundish head. Other than some shape similarities and maybe his teeth, Toothless is a unique creation -- and a lovable one.

There are times when Dragon reminded me of Lilo & Stitch but I was also reminded of E.T. and Kung Fu Panda and Black Beauty - and more than once - Avatar.

What's important to remember is that I thought of these things after I saw the movie - because while I watched, I thought of nothing else.

How To Train Your Dragon has real moments of heart and emotion with a surprising level of depth.

There's a scene when Hiccup gets close to Toothless for the first time and you can see him fighting every instinct he has to run away in fear but instead he puts out his hand - not knowing what will happen.

You feel how conflicted he is but then there's this profound realization that Toothless is just as conflicted but in a more black and white, child-like way.

It's an incredibly effective and emotional scene.

If I had to change anything about Dragon it would be more addition than subtraction.

I would have liked to have a deeper understanding of the dragon's inter-relationships, and I would have liked a clearer understanding of the history between Vikings and Dragons. I also felt that the final act was a little rushed and would not have minded it being a bit longer.

Even though I cringed at some of the awkward moments between Hiccup and his father, I thought they could have pushed the conflict a little harder for greater impact. But I also recognize that could have been too much for the younger ones in the audience.

I won't say Dragon is a "perfect" movie but it belongs among the ranks of Up and Wall-E and easily outshines both in terms of adventure and heart. The flying scenes alone are as euphoric and mesmerizing as Avatar and the emotional sophistication will surprise and delight you.

About halfway through How To Train Your Dragon I discovered that I trusted this movie to not screw up. It's sad but all too often I've sat in a film that seemed to be doing everything right, only to have it come crashing down in the final act.

I'm sure many of you are familiar with that nagging sensation that the wonderful film you're watching is about to blow it at any minute and crush all your hopes for it.

All too often - we're right.

I know I'll see Dragon again but while I'd like to see it in 2D to concentrate more on the story, I'm loathe to deprive myself of the joyful flying scenes in all their 3D magic.

More than anything else I found myself lost in the moment and remembering what it felt like to be a kid.

It's stories like this that made me fall in love with movies as a kid, and I haven't been able to say that in a while.

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
7 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

I feel bad for professional reviewers when movies like this come out. No, I'm not being sarcastic.

The original Alvin and the Chipmunks chugged it's way to a final rating of 27% yet every kid I know loved it and a disturbing number of adults bought the soundtrack.

It made buckets of cash and that's my point. This one will no doubt do the same thing but it's not the job of a professional reviewer to consider the success of a movie as much as it is to review it's merits as a film. So they kind of have to be honest when rating a movie such as this.

Sadly, I'll be there on opening day because I have a kid that really wants to see it. More sadly I'll most likely find myself tapping to the musical numbers even as I'm fashioning a weapon out of my straw and mini-M&M's tube so I can kill myself.

Angels & Demons
7 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes

Like many people I went into this movie with low expectations due to the uneven pace and loose plotting of Da Vinci Code.

My first pleasant surprise was that Tom Hanks' hair seems to have settled down for this one. The second surprise was how much tighter and well written this one was.

I know that many thought it didn't have enough action but I really never noticed.

I've always liked it when a story unfolds for those on the screen at the same pace as it does for the audience. Too many of the newer movies telegraph every single plot point or twist to the point that you get bored waiting for what you know is about to happen.

I think many viewers have become impatient because of this conditioning and don't have any tolerance for dialogue moving the story forward rather than more action scenes.
This is fine for movies like Taken because that's what the story is about but Angels & Demons is a mystery/thriller.
I actually like it when they're sitting in a library talking about the possibilities and discovering what comes next.

I had read this book a long time ago and had forgotten many of the major plot points including the wonderful surprise at the end.

As I've mentioned in my profile, I have no interest in laying out a movies plot when I review it - only in giving my impressions of whether or not I thought it was good and why.

I really enjoyed this movie. The only reason it's not higher than 90% is due to the shaky science. The acting, script, pace and plotting get high marks.