The Good Place
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
Got more questions about news letters?
Already have an account? Log in here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
No user info supplied.
Over time we have had many versions of the Joker, that of Cesar Romero, Jack Nicholson, Heath Ledger, Jared Leto, and that of Joaquin Phoenix, normally many ask the question of which of these is the best, that is a difficult question to answer since the Joker is a very complex character, I mean each of these Jokers works in its own adaptation.
The film is simply above the average of the current Super-Heroes movies, for example this one does not have forced references and you could say that it has moments in which the film can make you laugh, but unlike other movies of This genre, these are not silly jokes. As I said this is different, this is not the typical story of a man who has natural skills, a villain to beat who wants to destroy the world, and that in the end he conquers it without any consequence, in fact it does not even feel from the Super Heroes genre, it's more of a madness exploration drama, because that's exactly what the Joker movie does, it teaches you how a man can transform into the Joker, it teaches you how madness leads you to do Many unimaginable things.
For me the most realistic and more complex adaptation of the Joker would be this, without a doubt that of Ledger was very good, but Leger has more to be a former war veteran who wants to make chaos because there is a man in disguise playing the hero who a psychopath, however in this new version, this time Batman did not believe the Joker, this time it was the city who created it, which is more interesting because it is something never seen before (Well at least in a film of this genre ).
I loved the environment of Gotham City, it is quite dark at the same time as credible, and it is perfect for the film, the color palettes of the film is perfect for each scene of this film, it feels that everything combines, and that everything is instead.
That is why my favorite scene would be the first one, the colors combine perfectly, we see Arthur sitting painting, you understand that it is not that he is not happy, maybe he tries, but it is not, this you can easily understand because, while the It makes you smile forcefully, throw a tear, in a nutshell, this scene makes it clear to you how the movie will work and a raw story that probably does not have a happy ending, the best thing is that it tells you without any unique dialogue of the characters (except the radio).
The character feels human, everything he does feels naturally, he doesn't feel forced or anything like that, something that I like and that I like very much personally is that the character evolves from being Artur Fleck to being the Joker, this change is You can tell when he murders his adoptive mother after learning that he cheated on many things, from there Arthur becomes the Joker, who honestly sees him as Joker is somehow the healthiest state we see, since that Arthur was a man who suffered abuse, he was hallucinating, and he really didn't know what to do with his life, as long as Joker could say he already knows who he is for the first time, he accepts himself as he is and has a clear goal.
The hallucinations were very interesting, everything we saw in the movie just makes it clear that only two things were hallucinations, the rest is your decision whether it was real or not, words of the director. For me, everything starts to be a hallucination after Arthur stops taking his medications, since from here many things begin to happen that are conscientiously favorable to Arthur, for example, that he is invited to Murray's show, or that a complete revolution has been made thanks to him, I only say that if he could imagine a relationship with his neighbor, why couldn't he imagine a complete revolution in his favor?
That's why the final scene would be the best in the movie, this is the one that makes you doubt if everything you saw is real, for example, generates questions like, how the hell did they catch him if he was next to a crowd? ? o Why is psychology coincidentally similar to that of the beginning? or also that this place is similar to what we saw almost at the beginning that the psychologist asked if he remembered why he was internship.
The meaning of the film is what caused the most controversy, since this as in films like "Taxi Driver", or "Fight Club" among others can be misunderstood, as you may identify with what the characters say, if we live in an unfair society in which the rich get fat while the poor die of hunger, and that is why we have to make a revolution, and that is not what the film is transmitting to you, rather it could be something like you are not bad with others, do not treat others badly, or also what the movie wants to convey to you would really be something like what one of the background songs of this movie says that although others trample your dreams you don't have to let that depresses you, and that is the exact opposite of what Arthur did.
I really do not find much to complain about this movie, I liked everything and if it has any error this will be justified with something like "Remember that many things are hallucinating." Even that doesn't really bother me.
In conclusion Joker is a raw movie, which may make you feel uncomfortable, which is fine because it means that the movie is getting you emotions, which also means that you like the movie, this is a movie that explores its issues, with a great performance of Joaquin Phoenix worthy of an Oscar, with little action but with more than interesting moments, I hope they do not ruin it by taking a sequel, because he really does not need it, and if Black Panther an average movie does not stand out in nigun sense was nominated for Oscar, I don´t see why this not, that is why the Joker earns its well deserved 9/10.
Christopher Nolan is one of those directors who do not see each day, is known and respected for the trilogy of the knight of the night and for telling his stories in different chronological order. Interstellar was a film acclaimed both by critics and by the audience, it could be said that these were the main reasons why I wanted to see it, apart from Matthew McConaughey being the protagonist.
The movie has a good start, because you understand who is who and what you need to know about the main characters. The performances are as always in the excellent Nolan movies, the comrade movements seemed good to me, the environment I loved because it is not fictional, you think that what you are seeing is real.
The script is great in the sense that you can understand that Nolan made him want since he even bothered to ask a professional in Astronomy to help write the script.
The plot may sound something simple but it is really very complex, it would be that the characters have to find a habitable approach to save humanity from extinction, if that sounds very simple, but it is not because there is more like that mission itself was a farce and the human relationships of the characters.
The relationships of the characters feel real, the movie made me feel how the characters felt, it is very emotional to see how Cooper takes his time to decide whether to go to the mission to save humanity or stay with his children in the earth, for example when Cooper is taking the mission and his daughter tries to reach him desperately, you manage to feel the sadness that the characters feel at that moment, and that is something that not many films achieve, if their realization with Murph is quite complex, you could say that the main theme of the film is love, everything is done for love, in fact you could say that love is what saves humanity, the connection between Murph and Cooper is so strong that it helps Murph to save the humanity from extinction.
But no matter how emotional it is, Nolan did not make a perfect movie, since in itself, it makes no sense that a secret government organization hires a subject who has not seen in years for such an important mission, and when the characters go to the water planet and one of the characters stays on the ship, I understand that the hours spent there were 20 years on earth and on the ship, therefore I have to ask myself questions like:
How the hell did that guy survive 20 years on the ship alone without losing his sanity, entertaining himself and not resorting to suicide? Did they have provisions for 20 years? Wow, that guy really deserves all my respect, for surviving that, and the truth is that something that surprised me about Nolan was that, it was very obvious those who were going to die and those who were going to live, I say they surprised me because Nolan He is a respected director for not making mediocre mistakes, if he may make mistakes in his movies, but not as mediocre and repetitive as that.
In conclusion Interstellar is a film that I personally liked very much, with good performances, an interesting environment, a good direction, characters with personality, but with things that have weight for plot, which are the opposite of reality, this movie It deserves a 7/10 but I will make an exception, for the good attitudes, for the complexity of the protagonists, because Nolan took the trouble to ask for help from a professional for the script and because it entertained me a lot, it is because that this movie for me is an 8/10.
Ad Astra was an unexpected movie in the sense that it was good, since this and Interstellar's would be the only two astronaut movies and the space I liked,
The reason why I say that this movie is the Interstellar and Gravity worked, would be because it has a touch of both, it has the dramatic moments of Interstellar, for example letting the people you love to go on a space mission, or have the moments of astronauts crashing and flying out of Gravity.
The film has the typical archetype that the father of the protagonist was a great man and is now dead, but here is something different since, although he was a great man and everyone believed he was dead, when not, he was actually hiding, which generates the question Why, which makes the story more interesting, since this is not very common. It is interesting to know that the reason he was hiding was because he wanted to finish his mission and because he killed his crew since they wanted to leave, although this impressed me in the sense that I did not come to come, the only bad thing I found this is that this problem was solved relatively quickly, I mean Roy said "let's go dad you failed in your mission", and then Clifford "Ok son, well you know better leave me here in the middle of space" and that would be the end of Anyway, you understand why Clifford did what he did, but it just works out so quickly, Roy didn't see it in years and they didn't even say goodbye properly.
Another thing that I want to complain about would be the scene in which they are going to respond to the help signal, the problem is that this is very worn out and is very fanciful, they separate then one dies and the protagonist kills the being who killed his partner and escape
Something that was to my liking is that the protagonist has personality, apart from the problems of the plot this has personal problems, for example his relationship in danger with Eve or that he simply seeks to make sense of his life, and that we continually know what think For me it is quite creative to see how the writers imagined those constructions on the moon and everything else, I am not convinced that we go to that level, but if we do it it would not be bad.
The movie may seem slow since it takes time to tell its story in order to reach its goal which it meets, this may be the sea of your displeasure since if you are a lover of action and violence, it may be This bores you because it will not be what you want, since those types of people do not know how to value the movies for what they are, they do not like them because they are not what they expected, this does not mean that the film lacks action, if It has action, but not so much to consider an action movie, it has the action it needs to have (Except for the scene of the rescue call)
In conclusion, Ad Astra is a film above the average of today's movies, with good performances by Brad Pitt and Tommy Lee Jones, an interesting story that fulfills what is proposed, a protagonist with personality, but when the film is Exciting ends up being something fanciful, 7/10.
When I say that you will like this movie for sure, I am not saying that it is good, on the contrary the film is very bad, but the reason why I put that is because the average people of today are entertaining and like any nonsense that you put on TV, for example everyone drools when Marvel is going to release a new movie or they are going to take out another horror junk movie, everyone is going to watch it, but when they take out a movie like Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, almost nobody is going to watch it, not because it is bad, is because the Avengers are not in there or Toretto do not drive at full speed. By this I mean that Dora is more of the same, in fact you are going to love this movie because it is not very different from a marvel movie, it has a non-outstanding story, a character with special abilities, a villain, jokes and action , the only difference would be that Dora is not wearing a costume.
Honestly, the movie does make me laugh a little, but nothing more, the plot is boring, repetitive and predictable, archaeologists who want to find a treasure, the protagonist and his friends are going to look for it before the treasure hunters go and find it , they are caught by treasure hunters, they are released, then they have the treasure and defeat the treasure hunters. I only say that these plots have been used in many films (Indiana Jones, Tadeo the lost explorer, Tom Raider, the mummy, etc ...) that is why I say that this film is more of the same, it could be said that the only good thing is the jokes, they are not super jokes to attack you with laughter, apart the characters are very boring, and silly, for example Diego's description of the high school is ridiculously exaggerated or that Dora is exaggeratedly innocent, if perhaps he lived in the jungle all his life, but perhaps his parents never taught him how "normal" people are? or that life is more than ponies and flowers, and the love between Diego and Samantha is very forced, there is no evolving relationship, I simply say that there are no reasons why Samantha should like Diego because he is insecure, he He worries too much about what others think of him, they weren't even friends, and vice versa too, Samantha is unbearable, she is the girl who is delivered to school, which would mean that in a loving relationship she would prefer to put the school first than their relationship, and the truth is not pretty, and that she likes Diego just because he declared himself, it looks like a desperate attempt on the part of the two of being in a loving relationship, and you and I know that no is that his intention in the movie, they like each other because yes.
In my opinion I think that this movie would have been better if it had been about the life of the actress of Dora, I mean that Dora was a fictional character who was played by a little girl who got too much into her character, and when the show just went crazy because I did not know what to do, and this had personality problems, so the plot would be how Dora actress falls into depression and madness and we see how the film progresses, this would try to self I find, as he overcomes obstacles, that is to find who he is and overcome that alter ego of Dora, if I already know that this sounds very different from what the movie is, but if they were going to make a story of Dora at They would have done less well.
In conclusion, Dora and the lost city is a movie that simply the idea of making it was ridiculous, with occasional funny moments, boring characters, a repetitive and predictable plot, and also a repetitive environment, a movie that you would like because that's how it is today's people, 4/10.
When I say that Avengers Engame is the most overrated movie of 2019, I mean that people and critics praised it more, the movie, yes, you could say that it is "good", but not so much for everyone to go crazy and say that it is the best superhero movie, a great example of how overrated it would be like, this movie was recently titled as the highest grossing movie in the history of cinema in general.
Yes, if the film is very striking with its colors and all those characters, but simply what in Avengers Infinity War "struggled" to maintain the quality of the plot, here it simply does not matter, I just say that Captain Marvel suddenly find Tony and the other lady, they do not explain at any time how he did to find them, yes, if I know that the marvel lovers have already drawn their theories on that, to cover up the lazy mistakes of the writers. In Infinity War we saw the Thor plus Thor of the Thores, but now he is an obese alcoholic, the movie is not taken seriously sometimes, and that is a great example, or that Tony gets angry at first with Captain America because he does not It was there, blah, blah, blah, but if we use our brains, you will remember that in Infinity War he had the opportunity to call him and he did not, so I'm sorry Iron man lovers, but Tony had no right to get angry, and if we analyzed him well really Captain Marvel was a filler character, we all believed that this character would have great weight for the story but no, I thought that they did not try hard in their movie because they were going to want all this, but no, you can feel that the writers they didn't know what to do with it, and something they did go over with was the rat that accidentally released Ant-man, I'm just saying that you are more likely to see a cow flying outside your house to have that happen, which I leave wondering if the truck was closed, then how the fuck did that rat could get in?
The time travel is very badly done, quantum physics clearly says that two equal objects cannot be together at the same time in the same place, so that fight of the American captains is impossible, and the rest is not even said , for example, Captain America in the end stays in the past meaning that The Avengers never had Captain America, which means that everything he did never happens, which leaves me wondering. Why did nothing change? Why is there no temporary paradox or any consequence for your decision? It's simple, the movie is so shameless in the sense that it doesn't care about those rules and does what it gives the gift wins. After that for no reason, Steve gives his position to Falcon because ............. in order to make a reference to the comics, he prefers to give his position to an African-American who he met recently Than your lifelong friend.
Something that I honestly didn't understand, was how the gauntlet works, are you supposed to think about what you want and what happens? I don't know, I think, because Hulk throne his fingers and half of the universe that had disappeared comes back, but here goes the problem, if you think about it that is the worst thing he had to do, Thanos technically had already saved the universe by reducing the population , and that was something that the Avengers failed to understand, but that is the least, the problem is that being logical, of that half world literally literally, I wonder where the hell are all these people going to live? 5 years have passed and obviously their houses must already be inhabited by someone else, or their jobs, and logically they should have had an economic imbalance, but hey, the Avengers don't care about that and they are happy because they saved their friends, just I say his plan was very selfish.
If you think about it really, the one who lost the most was Thanos, his goal was really not bad, that for starters, even in a part of the movie Steve tells Natasha something that the planet is less polluted Thanos was looking for his stones for a long time time and when he found the last one to get it he had to sacrifice his daughter, he also lost his friends, henchmen or not dry were, then after saving the universe, he just wanted to live in peace and eat his broth, but the Avengers do not arrive and they kill him, then they make a plan for all their sacrifices to go to waste, poor Thanos.
To tell the truth that Hulk is now Hulk-Banner does not really bother me, what I would have liked is that they would have spent time on that, for example a movie of that would not be bad.
But well now talk about how good this movie has, and I'd like to start with those little big details, which would be like Hulk uses a pencil to press the keys because his fingers are too big, or that Iron Man gives the hug to that Spiderman did not want to give him at Homecomeming, also that Bucky tells Steve that he is going to miss him although he is supposed to only leave for a few seconds, but it is because he knows him enough to know that Steve is going to live his life, and that that would be the last time he sees him young and for me that he is the best he would be being that in the final battle with Thanos, Thor every blow he hits is directed at Thanos's head.
And as brave as it has been to kill Ironman, it was really a bit forced, although the only thing I managed to sacrifice was to avoid the salvation of the universe. I will analyze the advantage and cons.
-Give more years of life to humanity before it destroys itself.
-They managed to complete their goal.
-To condemn humanity.
-Leave his wife a widow.
-Let your daughter an orphan.
- Wreck the work of a visionary.
But the point is that the greatest hero of Marvel was sacrificed, the man who created Ultron, the man who caused the civil war between his companions and then locked them in, the man who created all those marvel villains like the Vulture , Mystery, Mandarin, etc. But hey, goodbye Ironman.
So and I have two questions for marvel lovers. How is it possible for a human being to create a gauntlet that supports the gems of infinity, when Infinity War told us that only a certain metal made by certain dwarves can do it? The only conclusion I reach is that Tony is a god or a celestial being. I also understand that if he is a god, he would be Ojo de Alcon, since he is in a moment of the movie he grabs a gem of the infinite with his hand and in guardians of the galaxy I learned that only a celestial or a god can grab the gems without dying, and in this movie, Ojo de alcon grabs it and nothing happens, so I understand that this man is a god or a celestial. Do not?
Something that I admire about this movie is that it is very good lying, to this I mean that it is so good lying that it made half the world believe that it is the best film not only of the year, not only of the genre of Super-heroes, but of the best movies in history, they are good lying that with the jokes, the characters, the fights and all those colors of this movie, it covers all those plot holes and makes people believe that it is an almost perfect movie, so it is of Men recognize that this movie cheated the world and almost fooled me.
In conclusion Avengers Endgame is a very good movie lying, with a great final battle, and with many plot holes, I just want to say that I found it very difficult to put the rating on this movie, it was between 4 to 6, but then I decided that This is only a 6/10, even though deep down in my heart I know it deserves less.