Cleopatra (1963)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.


Movie Info

In 1963, this colossal and opulent $60 million spectacular was epic in every sense of the word -- an epic investment, an epic in the annals of Hollywood gossip, and, ultimately, an epic flop that nearly dragged 20th Century Fox down the Nile along with Cleopatra's barge. Handsomely mounted by Joseph L. Mankiewicz, who replaced Rouben Mamoulian as director after six days of shooting), the drama follows the eighteen tumultuous years that led to the founding of the Roman Empire. Cleopatra … More

Rating: G
Genre: Drama, Classics
Directed By: , ,
Written By: Joseph L. Mankiewicz, Ranald MacDougall, Sidney Buchman
In Theaters:
On DVD: Apr 3, 2001
Runtime:
20th Century Fox

Cast


as Mark Antony

as Julius Caesar

as Octavian/Caesar Augu...

as High Priestess

as Flavius

as Sosigenes

as Apollodorus

as Brutus

as Agrippa

as Germanicus

as Pothinos

as Theodotus

as Phoebus

as Charmian

as Achillas

as Canidius

as Cimber

as Cassius

as Euphranor

as Calpumia

as Decimus

as Queen at Tarsus

as High priest

as Caesarion (age 4)

as Octavia

as Marcellus

as Mithridates

as Caesarion (age 12)

as Caesarion (age 7)

as Valvus

as Officer #1

as Officer #2

as Archesilaus

as Bacchanal Reveler
Show More Cast

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

Login

Critic Reviews for Cleopatra

All Critics (31) | Top Critics (8)

Taylor inhabits the role with a focussed but uninhibited imperiousness, as when she turns Cleopatra's entrance into Rome, aboard a giant rolling sphinx, into the ultimate red-carpet photo op.

Full Review… | October 6, 2014
New Yorker
Top Critic

It's a once-in-a-lifetime experience, for good and ill.

Full Review… | July 9, 2013
Time Out
Top Critic

Sad to say, however, the deep-revolving, witty Mankiewicz fails most where most he hoped to succeed. As drama and as cinema, Cleopatra is raddled with flaws. It lacks style both in image and in action.

Full Review… | March 23, 2011
TIME Magazine
Top Critic

[A] general muddle.

Full Review… | May 5, 2008
Chicago Reader
Top Critic

Cleopatra is not only a supercolossal eye-filler (the unprecedented budget shows in the physical opulence throughout), but it is also a remarkably literate cinematic recreation of an historic epoch.

Full Review… | September 5, 2007
Variety
Top Critic

Harrison, doing his waspish don act as Caesar, alone rises above mediocrity.

Full Review… | February 9, 2006
Time Out
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Cleopatra

½

Classic epic film from director Joseph L. Mankiewicz , Cleopatra upon its release was an ambitious film with a larger than life production. This is not a perfect film, but is one that boasts a well layered story, matched by some strong performances by Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton. What is very impressive with the film of course, the set designs, costumes and sheer scope of the film. Cleopatra is a richly detailed picture that is bold in its vision, and the performances match the look of the film. The most common complaint of the film is that, it's very long, and that it may be a hard film to get into because of it. Cleopatra has a terrific story and is aided by a broad cast of talented actors. However I also felt that compared to other epics of this style such as Ben-Hur, Cleopatra tries to be far too ambitious than it needed to be. In doing, the film becomes tedious; however the performances should keep you involved. The film is very long, like I've stated earlier, and I think the film could have been shortened a bit as well and if it would have been simply a 3 hour film instead of a nearly 4 hour film, then maybe this film would really have been something. Cleopatra is a very good film that is well acted, directed and paced, but it's also ambitious in its scope, and it's a picture that suffers more from its length than anything else. Despite this, Cleopatra is a big film, and tells a great story, if only the filmmakers would have trimmed an hour or so from the film, then Cleopatra would have truly been something to watch. However, despite its flaws, the sheer grandeur of the film can't be ignored and everything from the performances to the look of the film of the film is truly great and unique. If you enjoy big epics, Cleopatra is one that you should watch, but be warned this is nearly four hours in length. I enjoyed the film and thought it was a very well crafted film, and in terms of epic filmmaking, Cleopatra is certainly one of the largest film productions that I have seen. With a good story, this is a must watch, but due to its length it's not worth revisiting again and again.

TheDudeLebowski65
Alex roy

Super Reviewer

Strange now as the film was eclipsed by the love affair it started, so that one now views: 1) the story of Antony and Cleopatra, a real life tragedy for the ages, 2) the Hollywood film to that effect, a tragedy all by itself, and then 3), the two souls playing the leads, Taylor and Burton, who would go on to nearly live what first they merely played at doing, or tried to live it, or something. They recite lines to each other that they couldn't know was their future and yet we now know as true ... chilling. Opulent to the extreme, a pompous film, bullying, and finally ... perhaps more than merely memorable, a tragedy.

ApeneckFletcher
Kevin M. Williams

Super Reviewer

Oh wow, this movie was really, really long. About 4+ hours long. But the costumes were beautiful, Elizabeth was beautiful and the story was very romantic, in a let me gain power kind of way and a bit Romeo and Juliet. Rex Harrison is just too English, I love him, but he did not make a good Caesar. Everyone should see this classic.. at least once.

theylovealexis
Alexis Nomm

Super Reviewer

Cleopatra Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Discussion Forum

Discuss Cleopatra on our Movie forum!