Average Rating: 5.6/10
Reviews Counted: 138
Fresh: 71 | Rotten: 67
Though made with great skill, Funny Games is nevertheless a sadistic exercise in chastising the audience.
Average Rating: 4.7/10
Critic Reviews: 34
Fresh: 13 | Rotten: 21
Though made with great skill, Funny Games is nevertheless a sadistic exercise in chastising the audience.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.2/5
User Ratings: 28,316
Get your friends' movie recommendations by adding Rotten Tomatoes to your Facebook Timeline.
Notoriously nihilistic filmmaker Michael Haneke revisits one of his most controversial works in this remake of 1997's Funny Games starring Naomi Watts and Tim Roth. When a family of three arrives at their remote summer cabin for a quiet getaway, the sudden arrival of two psychotic men sets the stage for a harrowing life-or-death struggle that offers savage commentary on the use of violence in entertainment. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi
Mar 14, 2008 Wide
Jun 10, 2008
$1.0M
Warner Independent Pictures
All Critics (138) | Top Critics (34) | Fresh (72) | Rotten (71) | DVD (6)
That this relentless barrage of psychological and physical torture is extremely well made and powerfully performed -- Watts hurls herself into her physically demanding role with heroic conviction -- somehow makes it worse.
The fact that it features fine performances, talented direction and some moments of genuine suspense only makes the end product that much more grotesque and appalling.
Haneke's assault on our fantasy lives is shallow, unimaginative, and glacially unengaged -- a sucker punch without the redeeming passion of punk.
In addition to being borderline unendurable, Funny Games is inexplicable, and I don't mean in any philosophical sense. Who thought the world needed a shot-for-shot English-language version of Mr. Haneke's 1997 German-language film?
While Haneke is attacking our culture for being drawn to violent fare, he is also relishing in presenting it to us, in prolonged and detailed fashion.
The performances are outstanding across the board. The direction and writing are masterful.
This new version adds nothing novel, but it lacks none of the original's bite.
If you saw the original, the elements of suprise may be missing, but dread and suspense and nastiness are translated perfectly.
As an experiment in film form, Funny Games is intriguing, but the self-congratulation and post-modern trickery are at once irksome and intellectually and artistically dishonest.
We're left with the nasty taste of our own bloodlust long after the credits have rolled.
Registers more strongly than the original as a film about privileged white people...
An actors' showcase and a hefty serving of director Michael Haneke's self indulgence
There is something far uglier and dirtier below the surface: voyeuristic sadism in which Haneke implicitly involves his audience
It's a tawdry kind of horror movie plot, given new meaning by Haneke's considerable intellect.
I'm not at all sure that, in manipulating the audience to make his points, Haneke isn't as guilty of exploitation as the filmmakers and the films he's attacking here.
Mature, complicated look at movie violence.
The movie is unforgettable and will cause a reaction from you, whether you like it or not. Me? I liked it's sick, twisted sense of manipulating the audience
Flogging the audience is one thing, but to deny them free will in their role - thus responsibility - is something else.
After several years of "torture porn" horror flicks, Funny Games sets the counter back to zero, reminding us that torture isn't fun, isn't stimulating, and isn't something we should be getting off on.
In Funny Games, Haneke seems content to ram his thumbs into our eyes and then ask us why we were foolish enough to get within arm's length of his gray, grizzled visage.
...ugly and mean-spirited, which is I guess what its creator intended.
...a lurid piece of business, made all the more offensive for its apparent higher aspirations.
Funny Games is the theme park ride for anyone wanting to experience what it must have been like for Catherine Martin to put the fucking lotion in the basket.
With the cult of cruelty wallpapering the media more than ever, and murders, wars and celebrity breakdowns as spectator sport, it was inevitable that the cinema of sadism would grab the untapped egghead arthouse crowd market. And the stampede is on.
A disgusting indulgence in bloodlust likely to leave an audience feeling more abused than entertained.
toso idio me to prototypo, poy aksizei na to deis mono an den to%u0384hes dei, i an theleis na to ksanadeis
Didn´t expect such a disappointement from Michael Haneke, whose most movies I admire. Michael Pitt and Brady Corbet don´t convince. Hitchcock´s "Rope" is much a better example of psychotic guys and cold murder.
June 6, 2009Super Reviewer
Unless Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes was a shot-for-shot remake, (keeping in mind that I've never seen the original), I don't think I've ever watched such a beast, let alone one made by the same filmmaker as the original. I mean, what's the point, exactly? Perhaps a wider appeal in America/the English-speaking world,
March 20, 2012Super Reviewer
| 29% | The Vow |
| 93% | Mission: Impossible Ghost Protoc... |
| 87% | The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo |
| 28% | Underworld Awakening |
| 85% | Chronicle |
| 85% | Chronicle |
| 79% | The Grey |
| 7% | The Devil Inside |
| 2% | One for the Money |
| 76% | Rampart |
The Avengers stays strong at No. 1
Trailer: In bed with Zoe and Bradley
Video: Your friendly four minute preview
Latest trailer from Michel Gondry