Average Rating: 2.7/10
Reviews Counted: 72
Fresh: 4 | Rotten: 68
The Adventures of Pluto Nash is neither adventurous nor funny.
Average Rating: 2.2/10
Critic Reviews: 13
Fresh: 0 | Rotten: 13
The Adventures of Pluto Nash is neither adventurous nor funny.
liked it
Average Rating: 2/5
User Ratings: 31,433
Eddie Murphy gets way, way out in this futuristic sci-fi comedy. In the year 2087, the Earth's natural resources have been largely depleted, and an increasingly large number of people have taken up residence on the moon, where the pioneering attitude of the new residents has created a culture not unlike the old west. Pluto Nash (Eddie Murphy) is one such lunar exile who formerly made his living outside the law, but has since gone straight and now runs the hippest nightclub in the moon colony
Unrated, 1 hr. 34 min.
Aug 16, 2002 Wide
Dec 24, 2002
$4.4M
Warner Bros.
All Critics (72) | Top Critics (13) | Fresh (4) | Rotten (71) | DVD (18)
Another zillion-dollar dud.
It's boring. It's flat. It's ugly. Worst of all for a comedy, it's not even remotely funny.
How on earth, or anywhere else, did director Ron Underwood manage to blow $100 million on this?
It might be the first sci-fi comedy that could benefit from a Three's Company-style laugh track.
This ill-conceived and expensive project winds up looking like a bunch of talented thesps slumming it.
A listless sci-fi comedy in which Eddie Murphy deploys two guises and elaborate futuristic sets to no particularly memorable effect.
It's a real turkey.
An abundance of noise, explosions, gunplay, chases, special effects, futuristic eye candy and star power (including John Cleese, Pam Grier and Peter Boyle) generates very little pure fun or excitement in this cluttered visit to the moon.
Some diverting cameos, but Murphy struggles to keep this one grounded.
worst futurama rip-off ever
The movie is set in 2087, or approximately 100 years after scribe Neil Cuthbert last bothered to touch up his script.
'The proper term here is 'Battlefield Earth bad'.'
This is another dud to add to Murphyís already turkey-laden CV.
Longe de ser o desastre que muitos anunciaram, o filme funciona como uma aventura descompromissada (mas não como comédia) - e merece créditos ao menos por sua direção de arte e pelos bons efeitos visuais.
...Another mediocre notch in Eddie Murphy's spotty career.
Kinda sad that this endearingly strange flick will be remembered as one of the "worst ever", yet XXX is considered a good movie because it was profitable.
Given the enormous amount of money that went into and was lost in the making of this film, it's understandable that Warners would not want to sink too much more in the DVD.
I broke a smile once toward the end of the film.... I won't tell you where.
As much of a good idea as Pluto Nash might have been, it's execution is far less engaging.
What happened with Pluto Nash? How did it ever get made?
Though my expectations for the film were exceptionally low, it turns out that The Adventures of Pluto Nash is just diverting enough to recommend it.
It's everything you don't go to the movies for.
This Movie was tiny bit stupid.
December 8, 2009
Super Reviewer
oh, this was quite bad. Even the great cast couldn?t save this stupid, stooopid film.
September 23, 2009Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes