Average Rating: 6.6/10
Reviews Counted: 69
Fresh: 54 | Rotten: 15
Wong Kar Wai's redux, with a few slight changes from his 1994 classic, is a feast for the eyes, if a little difficult to follow.
Average Rating: 6.7/10
Critic Reviews: 18
Fresh: 14 | Rotten: 4
Wong Kar Wai's redux, with a few slight changes from his 1994 classic, is a feast for the eyes, if a little difficult to follow.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.6/5
User Ratings: 9,010
Master Hong Kong filmmaker Wong Kar-wai directed this lyrical, dream-like martial arts epic. A famously troubled shoot, the film took two years and 40 million dollars to produce (a shocking sum for a national cinema populated with low-budget quickies) and features a virtual who's-who of the Hong Kong film world. Conceived as a prequel to the popular martial arts novel The Eagle-Shooting Hero by Jin Yong, the movie is less a straightforward action thriller than a visually striking meditation on
Oct 10, 2008 Wide
Mar 3, 2009
Sony Pictures Classics
All Critics (69) | Top Critics (18) | Fresh (55) | Rotten (15) | DVD (1)
For this director's cut, Wong has trimmed several minutes and reorganized the narrative according to the passage of seasons, though the plot is still impenetrable.
Wong Kar-Wai doesn't supply much of a plot with a narrative engine to pull us through.
I struggled to engage with the archetypes contained within the images, even with all that meticulously restored golden-yellow sand.
Wong Kar Wai seems considerably more out of his depth than other Chinese filmmakers who have slummed in the martial arts genre. This can't compare to Chen Kaige's The Emperor and the Assassin or Yimou Zhang's House of Flying Daggers.
The kicks are more to the head and heart than to the body.
Martial-arts fans may find themselves disappointed, but Wong Kar-wai addicts will be delighted.
Como es habitual en el cine de Wong Kar-wai, la línea narrativa no es lineal y en cierto grado implica un desafío para el espectador, quien corre el riesgo de quedar por fuera de una anécdota que encierra su complejidad.
It's hard to recommend a film as frustratingly inaccessible as this one, but if you go into the theater expecting a trip to an art gallery, you might be pleasantly surprised.
Redux clocks in at a slightly shorter running time than any of the previous versions Wong has offered. The tighter edit is a better fit, but ultimately, it's not enough.
The film's imagery is its most striking asset, creating an impressionistic sense of both vastness and intimacy that frequently overwhelms the characters and their problems.
It's like watching paint dry--which isn't very exciting, however pretty the colors.
Ashes of Time Redux, like that line from Hey Jude, takes a sad song and makes it better.
Wong Kar Wai could make even a compost heap look as gorgeous as a Vermeer.
I know Kar Wai's got a fanbase, but to me he's equivalent to a recent film school graduate using all of the post-production tricks that he's learned, either to show off what he's learned or to cover up his lack of talent.
Wong's film is to be appreciated as poetry on film, an aphorism-filled ode to lovestruck dreamers, and for its beautifully rendered images.
The motion picture as mood ring.
Maybe something gets lost in the translation, as often happens, but Wong may be giving us the first Eastern.
Unfathomably gorgeous; perhaps even the most gorgeous film Wong Kar-Wai has yet made, which is not a bit of praise I hand out lightly.
Beautiful to look at, with painterly compositions, gorgeous, emotionally charged close-ups and slick, elegant transitions. It's all for naught because the story seems no more coherent than the flourishes of a kaleidoscope.
In the end, it's not unlike a Jackson Pollock painting. No matter how close or how far away you stand from it, some people just get it and some people don't.
Even drastically altered as it has been in Ashes of Time Redux, the strengths and weaknesses of the film are the same.
The film remains an acquired taste at best.
certainly one of the most beautiful films i have ever seen. but honestly, what the hell just happened?
August 1, 2008
Super Reviewer
No doubt a well made film and with great cinematography. However it was a little confusing at times to follow the story and who were friends and who were enemies. The big disappointment for me was I had expected something along the lines of Hero or House of flying daggers. Unfortunately this is a different type of film
November 13, 2009Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures