Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula) (1969) - Rotten Tomatoes

Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula) (1969)

Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula) (1969)

Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula)





Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.

Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula) Trailers & Photos

Movie Info

Cult filmmaker Al Adamson's first foray into the vampire subgenre has Count Dracula (Alex D'Arcy) living with his wife in a California castle. Butler George (John Carradine) drains blood from captives in the basement and serves it to the vampires in wine glasses, while Robert Dix shows up as a werewolf. Well-photographed by Laszlo Kovacs, the film is still notoriously dreadful and includes far too much stock footage of Sea World along with the usual deadly Adamson pacing. Trivia buffs will note that Paula Raymond's role as the Countess was originally intended for Jayne Mansfield.more
Rating: Unrated
Genre: Horror
Directed By: ,
Written By: Rex Carlton
In Theaters:
Crown International Pictures


Gene O'Shane
as Glen Cannon
Paula Raymond
as Countess Townsend
Barbara Bishop
as Liz Arden
Alex D'Arcy
as Count Townsend
Ray Young
as Mango
Robert Dix
as Johnny
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula)

Critic Reviews for Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula)

There are no critic reviews yet for Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula). Keep checking Rotten Tomatoes for updates!

Audience Reviews for Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula)

The Blood of Dracula's Castle is one of those obscured films that has stayed out of the minds of horror film fans and forgotten due to the fact that it is a cheesy low budget movie that doesn't satisfy. This is a dull, pointless and uninspired film that just doesn't deliver anything worth checking out. The acting is bland and it is never anything good, in fact it's laughable to say the least. I really wanted to enjoy the film, but I couldn't. There is never anything great going on-screen, and it's a shame because the film had potential of being quite good. This is a scare free horror film that simply is a waste of time. It's no wonder as to why the film stayed obscured, it's a movie that doesn't deliver effective horror or thrills. I thought that this was one movie that really should have been improved upon, but it's clear that everyone involved in the making of the film were clearly inept at making a movie work. This is one of the worst vampire films I've seen, and you just wonder how this crap could be made in the first place. This film was awful in terms of story and acting, and it doesn't do anything interesting with its ideas it tries to project. This could have been a worthwhile vampire film, but it fails and it should stay hidden from horror viewers. However for those really wanting to check it out, do so, but be warned that it's nowhere near a good film and it is a highly forgettable one at that. This film is a disappointment and an awful horror film that should have been better. Clearly the filmmakers wanted to rush the process a bit, and they didn't care about giving viewers a quality film, and it shows.

Alex roy

Super Reviewer

I couldn't really get past the first 30 minutes. Not for me.

Sarah Prisbylla

Super Reviewer

blood of dracula's castle is a fun horror b-movie grindhouse flic that is very creepy and shocking around in the 60's there were other big horror film such as night of the living dead, and psycho this movie may sound corny but it is actually a pretty enjoyable old vampire horror movie that is a fun campy funfest.

Max Moser

Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula) Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Discussion Forum

Discuss Blood of Dracula's Castle, (Castle of Dracula) on our Movie forum!