Daredevil (2003)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: Passable if derivative as entertainment, Ben Affleck fits the role but the film is not up to par with recent superhero films.


Movie Info

One of Marvel Comics' most popular characters comes to the screen for the first time in this sci-fi action-thriller. Matthew Murdock (Ben Affleck) is a lawyer whose father, a prizefighter, was killed by gangsters when Murdock was just a boy. Since then, Murdock has devoted his life to bringing wrongdoers to justice and is willing to help others by taking on cases no other attorney will touch. Murdock is also blind, after being struck down by a truck while trying to save a man from being hit. … More

Rating: PG-13 (for action/violence and some sensuality)
Genre: Action & Adventure, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Directed By:
Written By: Mark Steven Johnson
In Theaters:
On DVD: Jul 29, 2003
Box Office: $102.5M
Runtime:
20th Century Fox - Official Site

Cast


as Matt Murdock/Daredev...

as Bullseye

as Franklin

as Young Matt

as Wesley

as Natchios

as Father Everett

as Jack Murdock

as McKenzie

as Abusive Father

as Meat Packer

as Quesada Attorney

as Ring Announcer

as Angela Sutton

as Judge No. 1

as NY Cop No. 1

as Sweet Old Lady

as Flight Attendant

as Little Boy

as Rookie Cop

as Drunken Englishman

as Sharpshooter

as Forensic Assistant K...

as Quesada's Friend

as Quesada's Friend No....

as Referee

as Boxing Referee No. 2

as Old Man at Crossing

as Quesada's Friend No....

as Waitress

as Greek Priest

as Fisk Bodyguard

as Bully No. 1

as Bully No. 3

as Stavros' Friend
Show More Cast

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

Login

Critic Reviews for Daredevil

All Critics (216) | Top Critics (38)

Torn between moody grandiosity and cartoonish mayhem, Daredevil tries to have it both ways, and succeeds at neither.

Full Review… | July 7, 2010
Newsweek
Top Critic

[A] dull actioner.

Full Review… | April 18, 2007
Chicago Reader
Top Critic

Convincing in the physical demands of the role, Affleck persuades us of the pain of sightlessness and supersensitive hearing, although writer/director Johnson's scrappy construction fails him and everyone else as the showdown approaches.

Full Review… | January 26, 2006
Time Out
Top Critic

For all its clichés, it has a cracking third act, helped by doses of 15-rated violence.

Full Review… | October 19, 2012

there's a lot to like here and a comic film more people should give another chance.

Full Review… | July 30, 2012
Lyles' Movie Files

Superhero is darker, more violent than Spiderman.

Full Review… | December 22, 2010
Common Sense Media

Audience Reviews for Daredevil

½

[img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon13.gif[/img]

Directors Cat
Directors Cat

Super Reviewer

Back before the superhero invasion we were given this semi gritty realistic take to the man in red, and boy did they take it seriously!. Although there had been a few serious Marvel flicks before this, this was the first 'Batman-like' film to come along before the enormous Nolan film 'Batman Begins'.

So what do we have? a blind man in a red leather outfit with little horns, super senses, martial arts and a custom designed billy club. To be honest I've never really been into this character and kinda though of him as a poor mans
Batman. He pretty much does everything Batman does like lurking in dark alleyways and being vigilant from the rooftops in that traditional comic book gothic manner, accept DD is in New York and Batman is in Gotham. Just guys in slick suits with weapons.

The plot includes the characters origins which is fine, of course its all quite predictable and similar to all superhero origins. As a kid 'Matt Murdoch' gets accidentally blinded by some radioactive liquid, his dad raises him whilst he boxes in the ring under 'Kingpin'. His dad refuses to throw a fight so he gets whacked, this causes the young Murdoch to seek revenge and become the 'Daredevil', fighting for justice, forever in darkness, a guardian devil blah blah blah...Must admit I did like the origins though, wasn't overly long and preachy, it was simple and straight forward, looked good too.

To be honest the film isn't too bad it just lacks any real punch. There are of course plenty of money shots with DD leaping through the air in slow motion, plenty of acrobatics, martial arts and dark cityscapes for our hero to pose against, but its all style and no substance really...or should I say action. The opening battle within a seedy bar is by far the best action in the film, the whole sequence feels very 'Blade-like' visually and is good fun, After that everything is pretty anti climatic frankly, even the finale fights aren't that impressive.

Don't get me wrong the film isn't bad, its well put together and looks quite good, its just rather dull for a superhero flick. Was this the first time we had a (sort of) crossover in a superhero flick? I think it might have been. The intro of female hero 'Elektra' is a nice add on in the film which does set up the spin-off nicely and future adventures, shame she is kinda useless here though. The bad guys are also kinda unadventurous here too, 'Bullseye' is performed amusingly at times by Colin Farrell but the character just seemed average. Apart from hurling paperclips at everyone with his deadly aim he has nothing else to offer...accept the obligatory martial arts. I just felt DD could beat this guy easily with all his super senses, body padded suit and amazing fighting skills.

Clarke as Kingpin felt underused really, all he does is stand around and pose with his cane. His finale fight against DD is quite good but over too quickly, although I guess that is more realistic seeing as he's pretty heavy and slow. Not much of a fight for DD really. As for the Daredevil himself...well the character is kind of a second rate hero really, in my opinion, he's not up there with the main superstar heroes. In that sense Affleck fit the role perfectly because at the time he was a second rate action hero (still is). He doesn't quite have the looks, or the physique, or the voice, or the hair, or the jawline, he's a poor mans action hero, harsh but true.

Funny to see a young Jon Favreau here, who'd have thought he would be so important in the future of comic book adaptations eh.

I don't really recall the original theatrical version but this director's cut does feel much better, tighter, better plotting. I did enjoy re watching this and the added violence does indeed help. The film was never really gritty and dark but it has its moments, the DC does enhance that in places with a bit of blood, swearing and less romance...I think. But this version definitely comes across much better as I'm sure this film was much crapper when I saw it in the cinema.

At the time of release this was probably one of the best Marvel flicks alongside 'Blade' and 'Blade II'. Believe it or not it was the darkest superhero flick seen ('Blade' aside as that's more horror) as 'Spider-Man' was very childish and 'X-Men' was clearly tamed for the kids. It still does hold up quite well despite cheesy billy club twirling moments, the iffy looking outfit, the hammy dialog with Elektra and typical dark goth shots on rooftops.

With all those super senses I feel this guy should be a member of the X-Men really. And how exactly does getting splashed with radioactive goo in your eyes enable you to leap from the tops of skyscrapers and from rooftop to rooftop as if you can fly?!. It enhanced his senses so I don't get that connection but never mind.

phubbs1
Phil Hubbs

Super Reviewer

Shocking considering all who were involved. Affleck is good mates with Kevin Smith, why didn't he ask him for advice? I really hope this hasn't killed off Daredevil though as the Comics are really good! The Elektra spin off just adds insult.

SirPant
Anthony Lawrie

Super Reviewer

Daredevil Quotes

– Submitted by Jimmy G (2 months ago)
– Submitted by Nick S (22 months ago)
– Submitted by Nell M (3 years ago)
– Submitted by Robert H (3 years ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Daredevil on our Movie forum!