Dylan Dog: Dead of Night (2011)

OK well for starters we have seen this kind of thing now many many many times over, there is nothing new here and nothing that really impresses to be brutally honest. Despite that this is still a reasonably enjoyable monsters n myth film with a creative side that is clearly down to its comicbook origins.

I don't know anything about the comicbook but its quite old (1986), so I can't say for sure but I do believe this comic may have given rise to other such characters and franchises like 'Hellboy', 'Underworld' and probably others, the problem is they have left this adaptation too long and missed the boat. This a real mix of many cool ideas and the first to spring to mind was 'Van Helsing', 'DD' is very much a monster mash with everything from vamps, werewolves, zombies, ghouls and demons, add to this a neat little touch of black humour from 'Beetlejuice' and zombie sub plots involving zombie support groups complete with flyers and a zombie 'bodyshop' where the undead go to fix themselves up. Clever touches like that make this film fun to watch.

Now the first 30mins of this film is dull I can't lie, I was getting bored as nothing was happening. The idea is sort of like an old detective film with narration from 'Dylan' as he investigates clues, its nice and gives the film a touch of class but ultimately its kinda dull too.
Things start to spice up as creatures of the night come into play and the plot thickens, we discover a huge 'uber zombie' is killing folk and there's a battle going on between certain humans and the undead ergo..a bit like 'Underworld'.

The problem is the film does get more enjoyable but you just can't help but relate everything to many of the films I've already mentioned, you feel as if you've seen this before and you know whats gonna happen. The other problem is the effects aren't all that great on the werewolves, the vamps don't look anything new with their facial design (think 'Lost Boys' or 'Dusk Till Dawn') and of course zombies will always look the same. There is a quite lovely piece of makeup/prosthetic work at the finale where baddie vamp leader 'Vargas' transforms into a mega demon of some kind, looks absolutely fantastic but again it also looks identical to 'Darkness' from 'Legend' and 'Marcus' from 'Underworld 2' plus his appearance is a total anti-climax. In short the CGI work isn't the best and neither are the stunts really, blood n gore is minimal which is fine but makeup is probably the winner over CGI here. The CGI is about on par with the first 'Underworld' flick and obviously dated.

There is a hell of a lot of imagination going on here which is terrific and as this character came about in 86 I'm sure he came before much of what we already know in terms of night creature mythology. Had this been made before a lot of well known films then I'm sure it would have received a much better reception and may well have be known as a semi cult classic like such films as 'Blade' and 'Underworld'. Its a shame as despite the large amount of monsters all fighting for screen time the film doesn't feel clustered and it is nicely done with good humour and a nice noir detective angle. The zombie side is easily the best for plus points in terms of originality (almost).

If you try not to compare (GOD THAT'S HARD!!), this film is good fun and with better CGI work I wouldn't mind a sequel as Routh as 'Dylan' is a likeable character who isn't over the top and arrogant, I did enjoy the monster mash. Shame they had to include the always cliched and now over used martial arts n weapon fighting from the female lead. Have her a hardass sure but lets not go down the boring 'Milla Jovovich routine' again, no need for that in the sequel please.