Rotten Tomatoes Logo Do you want to see ‘For Your Eyes Only’?

For Your Eyes Only (1981)

tomatometer

69

Average Rating: 6.2/10
Reviews Counted: 36
Fresh: 25 | Rotten: 11

No consensus yet.

60

Average Rating: 6/10
Critic Reviews: 5
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 2

No consensus yet.

audience

63

liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 55,113

My Rating

Movie Info

For Your Eyes Only eschews the gimmickry and campiness of earlier James Bond films, concentrating instead on telling the story and maintaining suspense. Roger Moore is back as Secret Agent 007, this time on the trail of Soviet spies while he romances the beautiful Melina, played by Carole Bouquet. Richard Maibaum's screenplay has very little to do with the collection of short stories that made up Ian Fleming's For Your Eyes Only, save for the plotline involving Melina's seeking vengeance for the

PG, 2 hr. 7 min.

Mystery & Suspense, Action & Adventure

Richard Maibaum

Oct 19, 1999

Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment

Cast

All Critics (36) | Top Critics (5) | Fresh (28) | Rotten (12) | DVD (25)

Roger Moore has crumpled his comic-strip good looks into something approaching world-weariness, and the newfound maturity in his expression is reflected in director John Glen's style, which goes for the measured and elegant over the flashy and excessive.

October 13, 2008 Full Review Source: Chicago Reader | Comment
Chicago Reader
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Moore is merely the best-oiled cog in this perpetual motion machine.

October 13, 2008 Full Review Source: TIME Magazine | Comment
TIME Magazine
Top Critic IconTop Critic

One of the most thoroughly enjoyable of the 12 Bond pix [to date] despite fact that many of the usual ingredients in the successful 007 formula are missing.

October 13, 2008 Full Review Source: Variety | Comment
Variety
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Let's face it: When you've seen one impregnable mountaintop fortress, you've seen 'em all.

October 23, 2004 Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times | Comment (1)
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

By the end of the '80s, Bond would be viewed as something of a relic, but at least the decade opened with an enjoyable outing.

January 1, 2000 Full Review Source: ReelViews | Comment
ReelViews
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Sea and ski with 1981's Bond in an average outing.

December 15, 2010 Full Review Source: Common Sense Media | Comment
Common Sense Media

It's the only Bond film where M didn't appear.

February 17, 2009 Full Review Source: Ozus' World Movie Reviews | Comments (2)
Ozus' World Movie Reviews

First-time director John Glen knows what's needed to create suspense...put the series' trademark wit, women, and song alongside the high-stakes adventure of a more brutal 007. [Blu-ray]

October 25, 2008 Full Review Source: Groucho Reviews | Comment

...suffers from a disastrously plodding midsection that ultimately casts a pall over the remainder of the proceedings...

October 16, 2008 Full Review Source: Reel Film Reviews | Comment
Reel Film Reviews

If ever a Bond film could be described as understated, this is the one.

October 13, 2008 Full Review Source: Film4 | Comment

Moore just looks confused.

October 13, 2008 Full Review Source: Empire Magazine | Comment
Empire Magazine

The success of this picture (perhaps Moore's best in the Bond series) can be attributed to the marvelous direction of Glen.

October 13, 2008 Full Review Source: TV Guide's Movie Guide | Comment
TV Guide's Movie Guide

too down to earth

February 10, 2008 Comment

Look, Ma, no plot and poor dialogue, and Moore really is old enough to be the uncle of those girls.

January 26, 2006 Full Review Source: Time Out | Comment

The Thatcher parody at the end is sublime. The rest, passable fun.

July 7, 2005 Comment
New Times

Formula, fun Roger Moore Bond.

June 15, 2005 Comment
Video-Reviewmaster.com
More Critic Reviews

Audience Reviews for For Your Eyes Only

Okay, FOR YOUR EYES ONLY clearly is not at all the best film starring Roger Moore as Bond. (James Bond.) In fact, Moore is beginning to go downhill on the I'm-A-Great-Bond-Actor-Like-I-Should-Be scale, never performing a reality check, and uphill on the silliness scale, veering more to the 1967-Casino Royale / Austin

July 31, 2011
spielberg00
Alexander Diminiano

Super Reviewer

For Your Eyes Only is a more serious return for James Bond. The film has a more plausible plot that Moonraker,and this may appeal to Bond fans. The action sequences are thrilling and well done, and This film is one of the most solid Bond films since The Spy Who Loved Me and Live And Let Die. The film has a good cast,

June 29, 2010
TheDudeLebowski65
Jeff "The Dude" Lebowski

Super Reviewer

For Your Eyes Only Quotes

No quotes approved yet for For Your Eyes Only. Logged in users can submit quotes.

Latest News for For Your Eyes Only

January 23, 2012:
Reese Witherspoon and Ryan Reynolds Have Big Eyes
The duo signs on to star in a biopic about a pair of real-life dysfunctionally married artists.

November 2, 2008:
Bonding with Bond, Day 13: For Your Eyes Only
Community Manager RT-Ryan has never seen a single James Bond film, except for 2006's Casino Royale....

What's Hot On RT

RT on DVD & Blu-Ray
RT on DVD & Blu-Ray

Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 1

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Total Recall
Total Recall

Unconventional Superheroes

Top Movie Quizzes

LEGO Mania: 2011 Best Picture Nominees
by natalie - 18,513 taken
created 12 months ago
How Much Do You Know About Leonardo DiCaprio?
by natalie - 44,304 taken
created 15 months ago
Pixar Movies!
by jdikwlzviv - 27,073 taken
created 15 months ago
The Wizards of Harry Potter
by jdikwlzviv - 27,586 taken
created 15 months ago

Foreign Titles

  • Sólo para sus ojos (ES)
Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile