Average Rating: 6.2/10
Reviews Counted: 36
Fresh: 25 | Rotten: 11
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 6/10
Critic Reviews: 5
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 2
No consensus yet.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 55,113
For Your Eyes Only eschews the gimmickry and campiness of earlier James Bond films, concentrating instead on telling the story and maintaining suspense. Roger Moore is back as Secret Agent 007, this time on the trail of Soviet spies while he romances the beautiful Melina, played by Carole Bouquet. Richard Maibaum's screenplay has very little to do with the collection of short stories that made up Ian Fleming's For Your Eyes Only, save for the plotline involving Melina's seeking vengeance for the
Jun 26, 1981 Wide
Oct 19, 1999
Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment
All Critics (36) | Top Critics (5) | Fresh (28) | Rotten (12) | DVD (25)
Roger Moore has crumpled his comic-strip good looks into something approaching world-weariness, and the newfound maturity in his expression is reflected in director John Glen's style, which goes for the measured and elegant over the flashy and excessive.
Moore is merely the best-oiled cog in this perpetual motion machine.
One of the most thoroughly enjoyable of the 12 Bond pix [to date] despite fact that many of the usual ingredients in the successful 007 formula are missing.
Let's face it: When you've seen one impregnable mountaintop fortress, you've seen 'em all.
By the end of the '80s, Bond would be viewed as something of a relic, but at least the decade opened with an enjoyable outing.
Sea and ski with 1981's Bond in an average outing.
It's the only Bond film where M didn't appear.
First-time director John Glen knows what's needed to create suspense...put the series' trademark wit, women, and song alongside the high-stakes adventure of a more brutal 007. [Blu-ray]
...suffers from a disastrously plodding midsection that ultimately casts a pall over the remainder of the proceedings...
If ever a Bond film could be described as understated, this is the one.
Moore just looks confused.
The success of this picture (perhaps Moore's best in the Bond series) can be attributed to the marvelous direction of Glen.
too down to earth
Look, Ma, no plot and poor dialogue, and Moore really is old enough to be the uncle of those girls.
The Thatcher parody at the end is sublime. The rest, passable fun.
Formula, fun Roger Moore Bond.
Okay, FOR YOUR EYES ONLY clearly is not at all the best film starring Roger Moore as Bond. (James Bond.) In fact, Moore is beginning to go downhill on the I'm-A-Great-Bond-Actor-Like-I-Should-Be scale, never performing a reality check, and uphill on the silliness scale, veering more to the 1967-Casino Royale / Austin
July 31, 2011Super Reviewer
For Your Eyes Only is a more serious return for James Bond. The film has a more plausible plot that Moonraker,and this may appeal to Bond fans. The action sequences are thrilling and well done, and This film is one of the most solid Bond films since The Spy Who Loved Me and Live And Let Die. The film has a good cast,
June 29, 2010
Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 1
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes