Opening

76% Fast & Furious 6 May 24
46% The Hangover Part III May 23
92% Epic May 24
96% Before Midnight May 24
67% We Steal Secrets: The Story Of Wikileaks May 24
86% Fill the Void May 24
—— A Green Story May 24
—— Alyce Kills May 24

Top Box Office

86% Star Trek Into Darkness $70.2M
78% Iron Man 3 $35.8M
49% The Great Gatsby $23.9M
46% Pain & Gain $3.2M
69% The Croods $3.0M
77% 42 $2.8M
56% Oblivion $2.3M
98% Mud $2.2M
37% Peeples $2.2M
8% The Big Wedding $1.2M

Coming Soon

—— After Earth May 31
—— Now You See Me May 31
100% The Kings of Summer May 31
88% The East May 31

Gangster No. 1 (2000)

tomatometer

73

Average Rating: 6.4/10
Reviews Counted: 51
Fresh: 37 | Rotten: 14

Gangster No. 1 is brutally violent, yet also compelling.

67

Average Rating: 6.3/10
Critic Reviews: 12
Fresh: 8 | Rotten: 4

Gangster No. 1 is brutally violent, yet also compelling.

audience

75

liked it
Average Rating: 3.6/5
User Ratings: 8,585

My Rating

Movie Info

A portrait of a cold-blooded young gangster living and loathing in 1960s London, this drama features Malcolm McDowell in a major role in his first British picture in years. McDowell opens the film as the present day Gangster 55, who learns that an old associate, gangster Freddie Mays (David Thewlis), has just been released from prison after serving a 30-year sentence. The story then flashes back to 1968, when the young Gangster 55 (Paul Bettany) makes Mays' acquaintance and subsequently wins his

Oct 8, 2002

IFC Films - Official Site External Icon

Watch It Now

Cast

ADVERTISEMENT

All Critics (59) | Top Critics (14) | Fresh (37) | Rotten (14) | DVD (17)

Director Paul McGuigan and cast infuse the proceedings with a strong dose of psychotic gusto and visual flare.

September 12, 2002 Full Review Source: Dallas Morning News
Dallas Morning News
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Doesn't offer much besides glib soullessness, raunchy language and a series of brutal set pieces ... that raise the bar on stylized screen violence.

July 26, 2002 Full Review Source: San Francisco Chronicle
San Francisco Chronicle
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The film has a kind of hard, cold effect.

July 19, 2002 Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Gangster No. 1 is solid, satisfying fare for adults.

July 11, 2002 Full Review Source: Los Angeles Times
Los Angeles Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

They crush each other under cars, throw each other out windows, electrocute and dismember their victims in full consciousness. And we don't avert our eyes for a moment.

June 14, 2002 Full Review Source: Newsday
Newsday
Top Critic IconTop Critic

It's more than a rip-off of Guy Ritchie's Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, but less than the Pulp Fiction-esque genre-bender it aspires to be.

June 14, 2002
New York Post
Top Critic IconTop Critic

A stylish, confused and insanely violent gangster drama from a first-time Brit director.

September 16, 2003 Full Review Source: Citysearch
Citysearch

...cool shots do not a riveting film make.

August 1, 2003 Full Review Source: Reel Film Reviews
Reel Film Reviews

. . .captures the kinetic quality of the 60s with jump-action pacing, groovy camera angles and the occasional split screen treatment that never crosses the line into camp.

April 5, 2003 Full Review Source: Killer Movie Reviews
Killer Movie Reviews

It certainly feels unique, and sets itself apart from most American gangster films in its stark refusal to paint the lead gangster as likable or indeed anything other than the vicious socio-psychopath he is.

December 8, 2002 Full Review Source: Film Threat
Film Threat

It's a handsomely ugly affair, well dressed enough to make a few friends, but tough enough to make just as many enemies.

December 2, 2002 Full Review Source: Sight and Sound
Sight and Sound

McGuigan has assembled a stellar all-British cast in which there are no weak links.

October 21, 2002 Full Review Source: San Diego Metropolitan
San Diego Metropolitan

Malcolm McDowell is cool. Paul Bettany is cool. Paul Bettany playing Malcolm McDowell? Cool.

October 3, 2002
Hollywood Bitchslap

Not as well-written as Sexy Beast, not as gloriously flippant as Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, but stylish and moody and exceptionally well-acted.

September 27, 2002 Full Review Source: Oregonian
Oregonian

If you can stomach the rough content, it's worth checking out for the performances alone.

September 13, 2002 Full Review
Supercala.com

Paul Bettany is good at being the ultra-violent gangster wannabe, but the movie is certainly not number 1.

September 13, 2002 Full Review Source: TheMovieChicks.com

Audience Reviews for Gangster No. 1

Gangster No. 1 will never be the no. 1 gangster film, if nothing else, because its title sucks, but it's got its charm. Paul Bettany plays a very believable psychotic mastermind, and Malcolm McDowell plays, well, a very believable psychotic mastermind all grown up. Plus, there's a lot of cool, well-shot violence. Lot of well-made sets and costumes, too. But the story is pretty predictable, mostly believable but certainly predictable.
July 24, 2007
djdemersseman

Super Reviewer

Gangster 55: I'm Superman! King fucking Kong! I can pick you up and throw you a million miles. I'm number one. 

"It's not who you know, it's who you kill."

I'll admit it did take me awhile to warm up to Gangster No. 1, but it did turn out to be a really good English Gangster film. What won me over were the performances by Paul Bettany, Malcolm McDowell and David Thewlis. Each of those actors gave an outstanding performance. The movie chronicles the rise and fall of Gangster No. 55, played by Paul Bettany when he's young and Malcolm McDowell when he's old. Both actors really sell the character and make the Gangster a very interesting character. I always enjoy watching Malcolm McDowell and he gives a sinister performance. He also does an extremely good voice over throughout the entire movie. Bettany is equally sinister and really makes the movie.

Gangster No. 1 or as I prefer, The Gangster with No Name, does have it's flaws though. Many times the film comes of as an exercise in style of substance. It uses a lot of different editing techniques that I don't think helps the movie at all. If anything, I believe it hurts it. Like I said it did take me awhile to get into the movie. It didn't really become captivating until half way through, but from there on out it really is a great movie. Honestly I almost turned it off a few times in the firs 45 minutes, but I'm really glad a gave it a shot.

It's not going to be a gangster classic by any means. It borrows from a lot of previous films, but in the end it does separate it's self from all of them. It's a cool, stylistic and well-acted movie. 
August 13, 2011
blkbomb
Melvin White

Super Reviewer

No quotes approved yet for Gangster No. 1. Logged in users can submit quotes.

Discussion Forum

There are no discussion threads for Gangster No. 1 yet.

Foreign Titles

  • Gangster No 1 (UK)
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile