Average Rating: 5.9/10
Reviews Counted: 32
Fresh: 23 | Rotten: 9
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 4
Fresh: 1 | Rotten: 3
liked it
Average Rating: 3.1/5
User Ratings: 283,602
The best of the Elm Street sequels, this creepy, surreal fantasy features terrific effects, a fine young cast, and an air of grim fatalism that sets it apart from its giggly successors. Patricia Arquette stars as Kristen, whose nightmare leads to a slashed wrist which looks suspiciously like a suicide attempt. She is placed in a hospital psychiatric ward with a group of six other troubled teens who all dream about the same horribly burned man (Robert Englund) trying to kill them. Perhaps the
Feb 27, 1987 Wide
Aug 21, 2001
Media Home Entertainment
All Critics (33) | Top Critics (4) | Fresh (23) | Rotten (9) | DVD (8)
Debuting director Chuck Russell elicits poor performances from most of his thesps, making it difficult to differentiate between pic's comic relief and unintended howlers.
The film's dream sequences are ingenious, and they feature some remarkable nightmare images and special effects.
While it's better than its predecessor, it's still not quite up to its inspiration.
This is filmmaking by the numbers, without soul.
...the mental-hospital setting [is] certainly a refreshing change from the suburban atmosphere that dominated the first two films.
The burn-faced night stalker simply doesn't make the impression here as he did in the former two installments
Arguably the most imaginative of the horror franchise, with a fair number of truly resonant scenes.
First-time director Russell sustains the legend's success with the help of a workable plot and some first-rate special effects.
Freddy is a vital killer who brings a sense of creepy fun to his demented work - moviegoers actually like the guy. The nightmares themselves are another reason for the series' success.
A great sequel
The Slasher genre took a different direction with this sarcastic killer who delights in torturing his victims, simulating the nightmares we all experience.
Parts of it work extraordinarily well for a horror film of this vintage. And parts of it don't particularly work at all.
A creepy score and Russell's sure grasp of the skewed logic of nightmares helps to sustain the ambiguity between the 'real' and 'dream' worlds, while Englund's Freddie now fits like a glove.
The best 'Elm Street' film next to the 1984 original....Freddy's finest moment since his debut
Can you not love this?
The best of the "Nightmare" series
Alright, that's it, this is the last Elm St. movie I ever want to see! Here I thought that after that horrendous second movie this one would be worse, but no, it was terrifying, and I went back to my nightmares with Freddy. The original scream queen Langenkamp, who played Nancy in the first movie, returns to help
January 4, 2012Super Reviewer
This is probably my favorite entry in the series. "Dream Warriors" thankfully rebounds from the ridiculous "Freddy's Revenge", and actually advances the concepts presented in the original. The most notable creative progressions are the dream sequences. The imagery involved is disturbing, and instead of just random
October 4, 2011Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures