Rotten Tomatoes Logo Do you want to see ‘[Rec] 2’?

[Rec] 2 (2009)

tomatometer

69

Average Rating: 6.2/10
Reviews Counted: 65
Fresh: 45 | Rotten: 20

It lacks the surprising jolt of the first installment, but [REC] 2 almost maintains the original's chilling momentum -- and proves not all horror sequels were made equal.

38

Average Rating: 4.9/10
Critic Reviews: 8
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 5

It lacks the surprising jolt of the first installment, but [REC] 2 almost maintains the original's chilling momentum -- and proves not all horror sequels were made equal.

audience

59

liked it
Average Rating: 3.4/5
User Ratings: 12,186

My Rating

Movie Info

Picking up just a few short minutes after the first film left off, Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza's adrenalized action horror sequel follows a heavily armed SWAT team and a tight-lipped medical officer as they venture into the quarantined tenement building to uncover the origins of the bizarre outbreak. Their helmet-mounted cameras capturing every nerve-shredding moment of the mission, the team must fight for their lives when they're beset by rampaging victims of the demonic virus. Now, with

Jul 14, 2009

$27.0k

Magnolia Pictures

All Critics (65) | Top Critics (8) | Fresh (46) | Rotten (20) | DVD (2)

Multiplying the video-cams only dilutes the effect. Better to stick with one perspective. And see [Rec] first.

July 23, 2010 Full Review Source: Houston Chronicle | Comment
Houston Chronicle
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Bloodthirsty zombies come out to play to diminishing effect in this DIY-style Spanish horror sequel.

July 13, 2010 Full Review Source: Hollywood Reporter | Comment
Hollywood Reporter
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Frantic from the get-go, this new crop of zombie bait barrels through shadowy hallways and fends off waxen, emaciated attackers with such hysterical speed it's impossible to know -- or care -- whose face has just been chomped.

July 9, 2010 Full Review Source: New York Times | Comment
New York Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The shaky camera work (and explosive gore) can get literally nauseating. But when the characters' cameras run low, and the screen goes black? That's the scariest thing of all.

July 9, 2010 Full Review Source: Newark Star-Ledger | Comment
Newark Star-Ledger
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Unlike so many sequels, [REC] 2 builds nicely on the ideas introduced first time around; in particular, the nature and history of the disease, only touched on in the original, are explored much more fully here to chilling effect.

July 8, 2010 Comment
Los Angeles Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The new film manages to retain the claustrophobic tension of the original while deftly juggling multiple viewpoints.

July 8, 2010 Full Review Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune | Comment
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Not as fresh or frightfully exciting as the first film, but certainly scary, occasionally inventive and almost always enjoyable.

January 29, 2012 Full Review Source: IGN DVD | Comment
IGN DVD

The film gets a lot of mileage from its concept of seeing things only through the soldiers' helmet-mounted cameras, but the plot also develops in some surprising directions.

September 9, 2011 Full Review Source: Scene-Stealers.com | Comment
Scene-Stealers.com

Shouldn't logically work, but the raw creativity of the filmmakers lights up the screen, reworking the premise of handheld horror into a fierce, raging mix of Aliens and The Exorcist.

July 12, 2011 Full Review Source: BrianOrndorf.com | Comment
BrianOrndorf.com

It doesn't quite maximise the potential of all of its ideas, but it nonetheless provides a horror experience that's up there with the best of recent years...

February 3, 2011 Full Review Source: What Culture | Comment

Rather than trying to up the ante laid down by its predecessor, it simply picks up where that film left off (at the precise moment it left off, in fact), and continues doing many of the things that movie did so well.

July 30, 2010 Full Review Source: DCist | Comment

A mediocre third-generation copy of an idea that wasn't very new to begin with, and the addition of a supposedly rational explanation to the mix proves more hindrance than help.

July 20, 2010 Full Review Source: One Guy's Opinion | Comment
One Guy's Opinion

Fast and violent, with feral demon kids and a surplus of imaginative restatements of the genre's best-loved clichés.

July 15, 2010 Full Review Source: East Bay Express | Comment
East Bay Express

The quality has deteriorated like a dubbed VHS.

July 15, 2010 Full Review Source: Boxoffice Magazine | Comment
Boxoffice Magazine

It's more of the same, with an Exorcist spin, which isn't inherently a bad thing.

July 14, 2010 Full Review Source: Miss FlickChick | Comment
Miss FlickChick

Using the same frenetic pacing and POV shakycam style, [REC] 2 tries to go bigger -- but this time, the gimmicks can seem forced. Still, there's plenty to like...

July 14, 2010 Full Review Source: Boston Phoenix | Comment
Boston Phoenix

Approaches the rarified dream logic of the best otherworldly horror films. Call it meta or post-modern or whatever, but once this sucker hits nightvision mode, all bets are off.

July 12, 2010 Comment
Parallax View

The original created so much international buzz, who could blame the filmmakers for going the well twice? I can. [REC] 2 is a straight-up money grab so terrible it threatens to ruin the memory of how good [REC] was.

July 11, 2010 Full Review Source: TheDivaReview.com | Comment (1)
TheDivaReview.com

Offers a bevy of first-person scares and moments rife with tension.

July 10, 2010 Full Review Source: Film School Rejects | Comment
Film School Rejects

It's still fun, but you feel more like you're watching a movie than taking part in one.

July 9, 2010 Full Review Source: About.com | Comment
About.com

You'd be advised to forget [REC] 2 even exists. Go watch the original if you've never seen it or even check out Quarantine. You'll be much better off.

July 9, 2010 Full Review Source: Movie Retriever | Comment
Movie Retriever
More Critic Reviews

Audience Reviews for [Rec] 2

Direct sequel which picks up right where the first one ended... all in the same apartment building again too! But despite the repetitive scenary it's just as creepy and at times scary as the plot adds a new demonic twist on things making this a POSSESSION movie! Gore-wise it's around the same as in the first film, not

November 25, 2011
WrenchLT
Lee ?

Super Reviewer

Less about being scary, more about kicking demon ass.

March 21, 2010
kenstachnik

Super Reviewer

[Rec] 2 Quotes

No quotes approved yet for [Rec] 2. Logged in users can submit quotes.

Latest News for [Rec] 2

July 9, 2010:
Critics Consensus: Despicable Me Is Certified Fresh
This week at the movies, we've got a suburban supervillain (Despicable Me, featuring voice work from...

What's Hot On RT

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip

Luis Guzman
Luis Guzman

What are his 10 best movies ever?

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Top Movie Quizzes

LEGO Mania: 2011 Best Picture Nominees
by natalie - 18,575 taken
created 12 months ago
How Much Do You Know About Leonardo DiCaprio?
by natalie - 44,475 taken
created 15 months ago
Pixar Movies!
by jdikwlzviv - 27,174 taken
created 15 months ago
The Wizards of Harry Potter
by jdikwlzviv - 27,670 taken
created 15 months ago
Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile